Literature DB >> 3377325

Mechanism and management of persistent withdrawal occlusion.

J M Tschirhart1, M K Rao.   

Abstract

An unresolved complication of the use of totally implantable central venous access ports (e.g., Mediport, Infusa-port) is persistent withdrawal occlusion (PWO), i.e. the unimpeded capacity for infusion of fluids accompanied by the inability to withdraw blood. This study demonstrates the mechanism of persistent withdrawal occlusion and describes a method for resolving this complication. Of 42 cancer patients with totally implantable central venous access ports, 8 (19%) patients developed 11 episodes of PWO. Venograms demonstrated a sheath around the catheter beginning at the catheter entrance to the central vein and extending 1-5 cm beyond the catheter tip. Each episode of PWO was treated with 250,000 units of urokinase dissolved in 150cc D5/W infused through the port over 90 minutes. Venograms were obtained immediately after each urokinase infusion. Follow-up ranged from 13-130 days. After urokinase infusion the venogram showed no change in the sheath in 1 episode of PWO and complete dissolution of the sheath in 10 episodes of PWO. PWO recurred once in one patient and twice in another patient. PWO resolved only in the 10 episodes in which sheath dissolution was demonstrated. Urokinase infusion, as described, is effective in resolving persistent withdrawal occlusion. The method is repeatable and safe. That resolution of PWO by urokinase infusion was accompanied by dissolution of the sheath suggests that the sheath is composed primarily of fibrin and that flap action of the sheath is the mechanism causing PWO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3377325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  8 in total

1.  Implantable intravenous access device.

Authors:  L L Goldsworthy; H M Daly
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  The prognostic significance of the ball-valve effect in Groshong catheters.

Authors:  B Tolar; J R Gould
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Thrombolytic therapy for central venous catheter occlusion.

Authors:  Jacquelyn L Baskin; Ulrike Reiss; Judith A Wilimas; Monika L Metzger; Raul C Ribeiro; Ching-Hon Pui; Scott C Howard
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Management of occlusion and thrombosis associated with long-term indwelling central venous catheters.

Authors:  Jacquelyn L Baskin; Ching-Hon Pui; Ulrike Reiss; Judith A Wilimas; Monika L Metzger; Raul C Ribeiro; Scott C Howard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Administration of chemotherapeutic agents. Techniques and controversies.

Authors:  J H Raaf
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  A prospective observational study of the outcome of central venous catheterization in 100 patients.

Authors:  Arun H D Kumar; Nataraj M Srinivasan; Jayashree M Thakkar; Shaji Mathew
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2013 Jan-Apr

7.  TAK-733 inhibits inflammatory neointimal formation by suppressing proliferation, migration, and inflammation in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Jun-Hee Park; Sang Woo Kim; Min-Ji Cha; Nara Yoon; Chang Youn Lee; Jiyun Lee; Hyang-Hee Seo; Sunhye Shin; Jung-Won Choi; Seahyoung Lee; Soyeon Lim; Ki-Chul Hwang
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 8.718

8.  Comparison of hospital length of stay, costs, and readmissions of alteplase versus catheter replacement among patients with occluded central venous catheters.

Authors:  Frank R Ernst; Er Chen; Craig Lipkin; Darren Tayama; Alpesh N Amin
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.960

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.