Literature DB >> 33772556

High-Throughput Transcriptomic Analysis of Human Primary Hepatocyte Spheroids Exposed to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances as a Platform for Relative Potency Characterization.

Andrea Rowan-Carroll1, Anthony Reardon1, Karen Leingartner1, Remi Gagné1, Andrew Williams1, Matthew J Meier1, Byron Kuo1, Julie Bourdon-Lacombe2, Ivy Moffat2, Richard Carrier2, Andy Nong1, Luigi Lorusso3, Stephen S Ferguson4, Ella Atlas1, Carole Yauk1,5.   

Abstract

Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely found in the environment because of their extensive use and persistence. Although several PFAS are well studied, most lack toxicity data to inform human health hazard and risk assessment. This study focused on 4 model PFAS: perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA; 8 carbon), perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS; 4 carbon), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS; 8 carbon), and perfluorodecane sulfonate (PFDS; 10 carbon). Human primary liver cell spheroids (pooled from 10 donors) were exposed to 10 concentrations of each PFAS and analyzed at 4 time points. The approach aimed to: (1) identify gene expression changes mediated by the PFAS, (2) identify similarities in biological responses, (3) compare PFAS potency through benchmark concentration analysis, and (4) derive bioactivity exposure ratios (ratio of the concentration at which biological responses occur, relative to daily human exposure). All PFAS induced transcriptional changes in cholesterol biosynthesis and lipid metabolism pathways, and predicted PPARα activation. PFOS exhibited the most transcriptional activity and had a highly similar gene expression profile to PFDS. PFBS induced the least transcriptional changes and the highest benchmark concentration (ie, was the least potent). The data indicate that these PFAS may have common molecular targets and toxicities, but that PFOS and PFDS are the most similar. The transcriptomic bioactivity exposure ratios derived here for PFOA and PFOS were comparable to those derived using rodent apical endpoints in risk assessments. These data provide a baseline level of toxicity for comparison with other known PFAS using this testing strategy. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2021. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PFAS; TempO-Seq; benchmark concentration; bioactivity exposure ratio; liver spheroids; new approach methodology

Year:  2021        PMID: 33772556     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfab039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  4 in total

1.  Predicting the effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance mixtures on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activity in vitro.

Authors:  Greylin Nielsen; Wendy J Heiger-Bernays; Jennifer J Schlezinger; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  Official health communications are failing PFAS-contaminated communities.

Authors:  Alan Ducatman; Jonas LaPier; Rebecca Fuoco; Jamie C DeWitt
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 7.123

Review 3.  Adverse Effects of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate on the Liver and Relevant Mechanisms.

Authors:  Pingwei Wang; Dongge Liu; Shuqi Yan; Jiajing Cui; Yujun Liang; Shuping Ren
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-19

4.  Canadian Regulatory Perspective on Next Generation Risk Assessments for Pest Control Products and Industrial Chemicals.

Authors:  Yadvinder Bhuller; Deborah Ramsingh; Marc Beal; Sunil Kulkarni; Matthew Gagne; Tara S Barton-Maclaren
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.