Literature DB >> 33771953

Barriers and Facilitators to Obtaining Eyeglasses for Vulnerable Patients in a Michigan Free Clinic.

Olivia J Killeen1, Juno Cho1, Paula Anne Newman-Casey1, Lulia Kana1, Maria A Woodward.   

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE: Uncorrected refractive error is the main cause of visual impairment globally. Understanding barriers and facilitators underserved individuals face in obtaining eyeglasses will help address high rates of uncorrected refractive error.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to understand the barriers and facilitators to obtaining eyeglasses among low-income patients in Michigan.
METHODS: Participants older than 18 years with hyperopia, myopia, or presbyopia and without active eye disease, severe mental illness, or cognitive impairment at Hope Clinic, Ypsilanti, Michigan, were included in this study. The participants answered a sociodemographic survey and underwent autorefraction and an interview. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed by two investigators.
RESULTS: Interviews were completed by 43 participants, and 30 participants' interviews were analyzed. The mean ± standard deviation age of 30 participants was 55 ± 12 years, 70% were female, 57% were African American, 40% had high school diploma or less, 57% earned less than U.S. $25,000 per year, 93% had worn glasses previously, and 87% had some medical insurance. Uncorrected visual acuity was logMAR 0.73 ± 0.61; best-corrected visual acuity was logMAR 0.16 ± 0.21. Thematic saturation was reached after 25 transcripts. Top barriers to using eyeglasses were cost (312 mentions, 29 participants), negative experiences with eyeglasses (263, 29), and limited access to eye care (175, 27). Top facilitators were positive experiences with glasses (230, 29), easy access to eyeglasses (143, 27), and availability of transportation (65, 27). Most participants (97%, 29) reported being negatively impacted by uncorrected refractive error. Most (97%, 29) were skeptical about obtaining eyeglasses online because of possible prescription problems.
CONCLUSIONS: Key barriers to correcting uncorrected refractive error in our community span across multiple health domains but are predominately rooted in external factors such as cost and access to vision care. Online eyeglasses may address access issues, but many participants were uncomfortable or unable to obtain glasses online.
Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Optometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33771953      PMCID: PMC8007009          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   2.106


  32 in total

1.  Evaluating Access to Eye Care in the Contiguous United States by Calculated Driving Time in the United States Medicare Population.

Authors:  Cecilia S Lee; Aneesha Morris; Russell N Van Gelder; Aaron Y Lee
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Compliance with first time spectacle wear in children under eight years of age.

Authors:  A M Horwood
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  The value and underutilization of simple reading glasses in geropsychiatry inpatient settings.

Authors:  Shawn S Barnes; Daniel D Sewell
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.035

4.  Poverty and Blindness in Nigeria: Results from the National Survey of Blindness and Visual Impairment.

Authors:  A Tafida; F Kyari; M M Abdull; S Sivasubramaniam; G V S Murthy; I Kana; Clare E Gilbert
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.648

5.  Factors associated with spectacle-wear compliance in school-aged Mexican children.

Authors:  Aaron M Castanon Holguin; Nathan Congdon; Nita Patel; Amy Ratcliffe; Paul Esteso; Silvia Toledo Flores; Donna Gilbert; Marco A Pereyra Rito; Beatriz Munoz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 6.  Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050.

Authors:  Brien A Holden; Timothy R Fricke; David A Wilson; Monica Jong; Kovin S Naidoo; Padmaja Sankaridurg; Tien Y Wong; Thomas J Naduvilath; Serge Resnikoff
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  The Prevalence and Demographic Associations of Presenting Near-Vision Impairment Among Adults Living in the United States.

Authors:  Nazlee Zebardast; David S Friedman; Susan Vitale
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Effect of providing near glasses on productivity among rural Indian tea workers with presbyopia (PROSPER): a randomised trial.

Authors:  Priya Adhisesha Reddy; Nathan Congdon; Graeme MacKenzie; Parikshit Gogate; Qing Wen; Catherine Jan; Mike Clarke; Jordan Kassalow; Ella Gudwin; Ciaran O'Neill; Ling Jin; Jianjun Tang; Ken Bassett; David H Cherwek; Rahul Ali
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 26.763

9.  Barriers to Attending Eye Appointments among Underserved Adults.

Authors:  Maria A Woodward; V Swetha E Jeganathan; Weixia Guo; Jean Cederna; Paula Anne Newman-Casey
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

10.  The use of telemedicine to support Brazilian primary care physicians in managing eye conditions: The TeleOftalmo Project.

Authors:  Aline Lutz de Araujo; Taís de Campos Moreira; Dimitris Rucks Varvaki Rados; Paula Blasco Gross; Cynthia Goulart Molina-Bastos; Natan Katz; Lisiane Hauser; Rodolfo Souza da Silva; Sabrina Dalbosco Gadenz; Rafael Gustavo Dal Moro; Felipe Cezar Cabral; Lucas Matturro; Cássia Garcia Moraes Pagano; Amanda Gomes Faria; Maicon Falavigna; Ana Célia da Silva Siqueira; Paulo Schor; Marcelo Rodrigues Gonçalves; Roberto Nunes Umpierre; Erno Harzheim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.