| Literature DB >> 33771872 |
Jiong Wang1,2,3, Shuo Dou3, Xin Wang4.
Abstract
Heterogeneous moleclass="Chemical">cular catalysts bEntities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33771872 PMCID: PMC7997508 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf3989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Structural tuning of heterogeneous molecular catalysts.
Tuning the structures of TM complexes with heterogeneous states from first to second coordination spheres.
Fig. 2Non-N ligation effect.
(A) The Pd triphosphine complexes as CO2RR catalysts and one P ligated atom was changed into O, C, N, S, and As atoms, respectively. (B) The S atom ligating-based complexes with different resonance states. (C) Various coordination moieties with a Ni center embedded in a molecular graphitic cluster. (D) Charge capacity dependence on the potential for *COOH at different Ni-based coordination moieties. (C and D) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. RHE, reversible hydrogen electrode. SV, single vacancy.
Fig. 3A heterogenous molecular Co catalyst with tunable ligated atoms.
(A) Immobilization of Co(acac)2 onto S, N, O atom–doped graphene using a coordination tether. (B) Cyclic voltammograms of Co2+ ions on various graphene in 1 M KOH. (C) TOFs for OER. (D) A proposed OER cycle on the Co center. Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. SNG, S/N/O-doped graphene; SG, S/O-doped graphene; NG, N/O-doped graphene; OG, O-doped graphene.
Fig. 4Axial ligand effect.
(A) Axial coordination by a py ligand on CoPc. (B) Co 3d orbital splitting by the axial coordination determined from multiplet fitting of Co L-edge absorption. (C) The free energy diagram for CO2-to-CO conversion by CoPc with/without the py axial ligand. (D) A proposed cycle for CO2-to-CO conversion by CoPc. (A to C) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2019 Wiley-VCH. (D) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2019 Nature Publishing Group. MTPy, molecular tetra(4-pyridyl); STPy, nanosheet of tetra(4-pyridyl).
Fig. 5Tuned electron transfer by axial ligands.
(A) Charge density difference of NapCo axially bonded with the SO dopants of graphene. (B) TOFs of Co centers for CO2-to-CO conversion on various NapCo. (C) Calculated overpotentials of CO2RR on various NapCo as a function of ΔG*COOH. (D) Differential pulse voltammograms of various NapCo. Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2019 Wiley-VCH.
Fig. 6Dinuclear metal centers.
(A) A proposed HER cycle on LNi2+Fe2+Cp complexes. (B) Steady cyclic voltammograms suggested the gradual formation of Ni-Fe centers on graphene [heterogeneous Ni-Fe centers on heteroatoms doped graphene (HG-NiFe)] in 1 M KOH containing various contents of FeCl3. (C) Pourbaix diagram of HG-NiFe. (D) Synthesis of side-on and end-on dinuclear Ir sites on metal oxides. (A) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2018 Wiley-VCH. (B and C) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2018 The American Association for the Advancement of Science. (D) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 7Pendant group effect.
(A) FeTPP-Gnd (left) and FeTPP-PhOH (right) with CO2 adduct. (B) Plateau analysis of CO2RR by FeTPP-PhOH, FeTPP-Gnd, and FeTPP-3SA. (C) The intermolecular H-bonds between TFE and Co complexes. The number of pendant amines in complexes was tuned. (D) The dependence of kobs on the number of pendant amines in the Co complexes. (A and B) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (C and D) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 8Electron withdrawing/donating effect.
(A) Effect of the Lewis acidity of redox-inactive metal ions on the reactions of 1-M with reductant (+e−) and oxidant (−e−). (B) Cyclic voltammograms of 1 (black) and 1-M [M = Sr2+ (blue), Ca2+ (red), Zn2+ (green), and Sc3+ (cyan)] with 1e− oxidation (left) and 1e− reduction (right) in MeCN at −20°C. (C) Condensation of o-phenylenediamine derivatives with o-quinone sites at graphene graphene. (D) Tafel plots of per site activity versus potential for 1 (black), 2 (red), 3 (blue), and polycrystalline Ag (green). (A and B) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2014 Nature Publishing Group. (C and D) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 9Heterogeneous NiPc appended with electron withdrawing/donating groups.
(A) Various NiPc immobilized on CNT. (B) Linear scanning voltammograms of NiPc-based catalysts in CO2-saturated 0.5 M KHCO3. (C) Chronoamperometry of NiPc/CNT at −0.68 V, NiPc-CN/CNT at −0.56 V, and NiPc-OMe/CNT at −0.64 V. The potentials were referenced against RHE. Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2020 Nature Publishing Group.
Fig. 10Electron conjugation effect.
(A) Structures of the complexes and those immobilized on graphene. (B) Cyclic voltammograms of 1 and 2. (C) Tafel plots for 1, 2, G-1, and G-2. (D) Structures of GCC-CoTPP and Amide-CoTPP. (E) TOFs for ORR on GCC-CoTPP and Amide-CoTPP. (A to C) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (D and E) Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 11Tuned catalytic mechanism by electron conjugation.
(A) Complexes mediate HER through stepwise pathways. (B) Graphene-conjugated complexes for HER through concerted proton and electron transfer. Reproduced with permission from (). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.