Eduardo Vasconcelos Freitas1, Mayara Kato Perez2, Andrew E Jimenez3, Jailson Rodrigues Lopes4, André Fukunishi Yamada5, Moises Cohen6, Diego Costa Astur7. 1. Sports Medicine Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Hospital do Coração, Teleimagem, Fleury Laboratórios, and CDB, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. University of Connecticut, UConn Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A. 4. Hospital Antônio Prudente, Fortaleza, Brazil. 5. Departamento de Diagnóstico por Imagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 6. Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department from Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 7. Knee Group, Sports Medicine Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Samaritano, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: diego.astur@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relation between the femoral intercondylar index, tibial slope, and meniscal slope between 3 different groups of skeletally immature patients: primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (group 1), ACL reconstruction failure (group 2), and control group, without an ACL injury history (group 3). METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated magnetic resonance imaging scans of the knees of 605 skeletally immature patients obtained between 2015 and 2020. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients younger than 16 years who were skeletally immature and underwent knee magnetic resonance imaging for any reason. RESULTS: A total of 605 skeletally immature patients were included in the study. The ratio of patients with ACL injury (cases) to those without ACL injury (controls) was 1:2.5. Patients with ACL injury had significantly greater medial meniscal slope and lateral meniscal slope values than the control group without ACL injury (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with primary ACL injury and those with ACL reconstruction failure for all measured variables. CONCLUSIONS: The medial and lateral meniscal slope values were significantly higher in skeletally immature patients with ACL injury than in the control group of patients without ACL injury. There was no statistically significant difference in measurements of the femoral intercondylar index, lateral meniscal slope, medial meniscal slope, lateral tibial slope, or medial tibial slope between patients with primary injury and those with ACL reconstruction failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative trial.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relation between the femoral intercondylar index, tibial slope, and meniscal slope between 3 different groups of skeletally immature patients: primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (group 1), ACL reconstruction failure (group 2), and control group, without an ACL injury history (group 3). METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated magnetic resonance imaging scans of the knees of 605 skeletally immature patients obtained between 2015 and 2020. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients younger than 16 years who were skeletally immature and underwent knee magnetic resonance imaging for any reason. RESULTS: A total of 605 skeletally immature patients were included in the study. The ratio of patients with ACL injury (cases) to those without ACL injury (controls) was 1:2.5. Patients with ACL injury had significantly greater medial meniscal slope and lateral meniscal slope values than the control group without ACL injury (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with primary ACL injury and those with ACL reconstruction failure for all measured variables. CONCLUSIONS: The medial and lateral meniscal slope values were significantly higher in skeletally immature patients with ACL injury than in the control group of patients without ACL injury. There was no statistically significant difference in measurements of the femoral intercondylar index, lateral meniscal slope, medial meniscal slope, lateral tibial slope, or medial tibial slope between patients with primary injury and those with ACL reconstruction failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative trial.