Literature DB >> 33771659

Histological evaluation of extraction sites grafted with Bio-Oss Collagen: Randomized controlled trial.

Christiane Keil1, Barbara Gollmer2, Ines Zeidler-Rentzsch2, Tomasz Gredes2, Friedhelm Heinemann3.   

Abstract

The combination of bovine bone matrix with collagen shows good results in bone and volume preservation after tooth extraction. To determine the ideal time to apply an implant after augmentation with Bio-Oss Collagen and to observe if there are differences in the age of the patients and the sex, the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the post-extraction changes in angiogenic and osteogenic aspects during spontaneous bone regeneration with those during socket preservation using Bio-Oss Collagen. Sixty-six patients were included in this study. After 8-12 weeks, bone biopsies were embedded in paraffin and histological and immune-histological investigated. Using qRT-PCR bone (Alpl, Bglap, Runx2) and angiogenic markers (VEGF, caveolin-1) were identified. The histomorphometric analysis of all examined samples showed no differences between treated and untreated sockets, but a tissue compression. After classification in bone regeneration stages, more samples with woven bone were present in treated sockets than in controls. The Alpl expression correlates with increase in mature bone tissue. In treated sockets a significant decrease in CD34 and caveolin-1 protein expression was found. Additionally, a significant increase of Runx2 and VEGF mRNA was detected in patients younger than 50 years. Thus, all specimens showed ossification in different stages after eight weeks of healing. The treated group gives an earlier stage of ossification than controls, but produces densified tissue with greater volume fraction. It can be assumed that successful implant placement in Bio-Oss Collagen augmented extraction sockets is possible after eight weeks of bone healing.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone augmentation; Graft material; Histomorphometry; qRT-PCR

Year:  2021        PMID: 33771659     DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Anat        ISSN: 0940-9602            Impact factor:   2.698


  4 in total

1.  Biocompatibility Assessment of Two Commercial Bone Xenografts by In Vitro and In Vivo Methods.

Authors:  Carlos Humberto Valencia-Llano; Diego López-Tenorio; Carlos David Grande-Tovar
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.967

2.  Custom Bone Regeneration (CBR): An Alternative Method of Bone Augmentation-A Case Series Study.

Authors:  Daniele De Santis; Luciano Umberto; Donadello Dario; Faccioni Paolo; Morris Zarantonello; Cristian Alberti; Giuseppe Verlato; Federico Gelpi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Comparison of Two Bovine Commercial Xenografts in the Regeneration of Critical Cranial Defects.

Authors:  Carlos Humberto Valencia-Llano; Diego López-Tenorio; Marcela Saavedra; Paula A Zapata; Carlos David Grande-Tovar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  A Comparative Study of Two Bone Graft Substitutes-InterOss® Collagen and OCS-B Collagen®.

Authors:  Gaurav Jain; Dylan Blaauw; Steve Chang
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-03-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.