Literature DB >> 33771470

Effects of size, cooperativity, and competitive binding on protein positioning on DNA.

Leo S McCormack1, Artem K Efremov2, Jie Yan3.   

Abstract

Accurate positioning of proteins on chromosomal DNA is crucial for its proper organization as well as gene transcription regulation. Recent experiments revealed existence of periodic patterns of nucleoprotein complexes on DNA, which frequently cannot be explained by sequence-dependent binding of proteins. Previous theoretical studies suggest that such patterns typically emerge as a result of the proteins' volume-exclusion effect. However, the role of other physical factors in patterns' formation, such as the length of DNA, its sequence heterogeneity, and protein binding cooperativity/binding competition to DNA, remains unclear. To address these less understood yet important aspects, we investigated potential effects of these factors on protein positioning on finite-size DNA by using transfer-matrix calculations. It has been found that upon binding to DNA, proteins form oscillatory patterns that span over the length of up to ∼10 times the size of the protein binding site, with the shape of the patterns being strongly dependent on the length of DNA and the proteins' binding cooperativity to DNA. Furthermore, calculations showed that small variations in the proteins' affinity to DNA due to its sequence heterogeneity do not much change the main geometric characteristics of the observed protein patterns. Finally, competition between two different types of proteins for binding to DNA has been found to lead to formation of highly diverse and complex alternating positioning of the two proteins. Altogether, these results provide new insights into the roles of physicochemical properties of proteins, the DNA length, and DNA-binding competition between proteins in formation of protein positioning patterns on DNA.
Copyright © 2021 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33771470      PMCID: PMC8204397          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  43 in total

1.  Nucleosome positioning, nucleosome spacing and the nucleosome code.

Authors:  David J Clark
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2010-06

2.  AFM imaging and theoretical modeling studies of sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning.

Authors:  Sabrina Pisano; Emanuela Pascucci; Stefano Cacchione; Pasquale De Santis; Maria Savino
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  A genomic code for nucleosome positioning.

Authors:  Eran Segal; Yvonne Fondufe-Mittendorf; Lingyi Chen; AnnChristine Thåström; Yair Field; Irene K Moore; Ji-Ping Z Wang; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Modeling nucleosome position distributions from experimental nucleosome positioning maps.

Authors:  Robert Schöpflin; Vladimir B Teif; Oliver Müller; Christin Weinberg; Karsten Rippe; Gero Wedemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Nucleosome positioning by genomic excluding-energy barriers.

Authors:  Pascale Milani; Guillaume Chevereau; Cédric Vaillant; Benjamin Audit; Zofia Haftek-Terreau; Monique Marilley; Philippe Bouvet; Françoise Argoul; Alain Arneodo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics.

Authors:  Ilya P Ioshikhes; Istvan Albert; Sara J Zanton; B Franklin Pugh
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-09-10       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Transfer-matrix calculations of the effects of tension and torque constraints on DNA-protein interactions.

Authors:  Artem K Efremov; Jie Yan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  High-resolution mapping of chromatin packaging in mouse embryonic stem cells and sperm.

Authors:  Benjamin R Carone; Jui-Hung Hung; Sarah J Hainer; Min-Te Chou; Dawn M Carone; Zhiping Weng; Thomas G Fazzio; Oliver J Rando
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 9.  How do DNA-bound proteins leave their binding sites? The role of facilitated dissociation.

Authors:  Aykut Erbaş; John F Marko
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Unzipping single DNA molecules to study nucleosome structure and dynamics.

Authors:  Ming Li; Michelle D Wang
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.