Literature DB >> 33771205

Efficacy and safety of GV1001 in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease already receiving donepezil: a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial.

Seong-Ho Koh1,2, Hyuk Sung Kwon3, Seong Hye Choi4, Jee Hyang Jeong5, Hae Ri Na6, Chan Nyoung Lee7, YoungSoon Yang8, Ae Young Lee9, Jae-Hong Lee10, Kyung Won Park11, Hyun Jeong Han12, Byeong C Kim13, Jin Se Park14, Jee-Young Lee15, Sangjae Kim16, Kyu-Yong Lee3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our previous studies showed that GV1001 has various protective effects against β-amyloid and other stressors. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that GV1001 might have beneficial effects in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).
METHODS: A phase 2, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 6-month randomized clinical trial was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneously administered GV1001. Between September 2017 and September 2019, 13 centers in South Korea recruited participants. A total of 106 patients were screened, and 96 patients with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized 1:1:1 to the placebo (group 1, n = 31), GV1001 0.56 mg (group 2, n = 33), and 1.12 mg (group 3, n = 32) groups. GV1001 was administered every week for 4 weeks (4 times), followed by every 2 weeks until week 24 (10 times). The primary endpoint was the change in the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) score from baseline to week 24. The key secondary efficacy endpoints were the change in the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Box (CDR-SOB), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Mini-Mental State Examination, and Global Deterioration Scale scores. The safety endpoints were also assessed based on adverse events, laboratory test results, vital signs, and other observations related to safety.
RESULTS: Group 3 showed less decrease in the SIB score at 12 and 24 weeks compared with group 1 (P < 0.05). These were not significantly observed in group 2. Among the secondary endpoints, only the NPI score showed significantly better improvement in group 2 than in group 3 at week 12; however, there were no other significant differences between the groups. Although the ADCS-ADL and CDR-SOB scores showed a pattern similar to SIB scores, a statistically significant result was not found. Adverse events were similar across all three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that GV1001 1.12 mg met the primary endpoint of a statistically significant difference. GV1001 was well tolerated without safety concerns. This study warrants a larger clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03184467 . Registered on June 12, 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Clinical trial; Efficacy; GV1001; Safety

Year:  2021        PMID: 33771205      PMCID: PMC7995588          DOI: 10.1186/s13195-021-00803-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther            Impact factor:   6.982


  34 in total

1.  A 24-week, randomized, double-blind study of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  H Feldman; S Gauthier; J Hecker; B Vellas; P Subbiah; E Whalen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Differential contribution of microglia and monocytes in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Caroline Baufeld; Elaine O'Loughlin; Narghes Calcagno; Charlotte Madore; Oleg Butovsky
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia.

Authors:  J L Cummings; M Mega; K Gray; S Rosenberg-Thompson; D A Carusi; J Gornbein
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.

Authors:  H Braak; E Braak
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.088

Review 5.  Neuropsychological assessment of the severely impaired elderly patient.

Authors:  J Saxton; A A Swihart
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.076

Review 6.  NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Clifford R Jack; David A Bennett; Kaj Blennow; Maria C Carrillo; Billy Dunn; Samantha Budd Haeberlein; David M Holtzman; William Jagust; Frank Jessen; Jason Karlawish; Enchi Liu; Jose Luis Molinuevo; Thomas Montine; Creighton Phelps; Katherine P Rankin; Christopher C Rowe; Philip Scheltens; Eric Siemers; Heather M Snyder; Reisa Sperling
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 7.  Advances in developing novel therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jiqing Cao; Jianwei Hou; Jing Ping; Dongming Cai
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 14.195

8.  Alzheimer's disease drug development pipeline: 2019.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cummings; Garam Lee; Aaron Ritter; Marwan Sabbagh; Kate Zhong
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2019-07-09

9.  A 24-week, randomized, controlled trial of rivastigmine patch 13.3 mg/24 h versus 4.6 mg/24 h in severe Alzheimer's dementia.

Authors:  Martin R Farlow; George T Grossberg; Carl H Sadowsky; Xiangyi Meng; Monique Somogyi
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 10.  Aducanumab, gantenerumab, BAN2401, and ALZ-801-the first wave of amyloid-targeting drugs for Alzheimer's disease with potential for near term approval.

Authors:  Martin Tolar; Susan Abushakra; John A Hey; Anton Porsteinsson; Marwan Sabbagh
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 8.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.