Literature DB >> 33771182

Removal of an osteointegrated broken uncemented femoral stem after hip arthroplasty-technical note.

Peter Wahl1,2, Theo Solinger3,4, Michel Schläppi5, Emanuel Gautier3.   

Abstract

Broken stems are particularly challenging in revision hip arthroplasty, as no standard extraction instruments fit anymore. Well-integrated uncemented stem remnants can be particularly arduous to remove. Stem fatigue failure is not rare with modular stems. Since these are particularly useful in revision hip arthroplasty, increasing numbers of broken stems are to be expected. Usually applied techniques using cortical fenestration distally to the tip of the stem or using an extended transfemoral approach cause supplementary bone defects impairing reconstruction. We present a relatively simple and reproducible revision technique, using a limited standard approach and only regular orthopedic instruments, to extract the remnants of broken uncemented femoral stems in hip arthroplasty. This technique was applied successfully and without complications in 6 cases, permitting eventually the reimplantation of even shorter stems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Broken stem; Extraction; Hip arthroplasty; Removal; Revision; Transfemoral

Year:  2021        PMID: 33771182      PMCID: PMC7995790          DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02365-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


  18 in total

1.  Retrograde stem removal in revision hip surgery: removing a loose or broken femoral component with a retrograde nail.

Authors:  K Tóth; K Sisák; J Nagy; S Manó; Z Csernátony
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Removal of well-fixed fixed femoral stems.

Authors:  J-M Laffosse
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.256

3.  Fatigue fracture in dual modular revision total hip arthroplasty stems: failure analysis and computed tomography diagnostics in two cases.

Authors:  Pontus Norman; Srinivasan Iyengar; Ingrid Svensson; Gunnar Flivik
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Fractures of distally-fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Busch; M N Charles; C M Haydon; R B Bourne; C H Rorabeck; S J Macdonald; R W McCalden
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-10

5.  The window technique for the removal of broken femoral stems in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J R Moreland; R Marder; W E Anspach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.

Authors:  Monti Khatod; Guy Cafri; Maria C S Inacio; Alan L Schepps; Elizabeth W Paxton; Stefano A Bini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Electrosurgery Induced Femoral Stem Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

Authors:  Martin Aepli; Christoph Meier; Peter Wahl
Journal:  JBJS Case Connect       Date:  2019-12

8.  High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.

Authors:  J Benoist; J-C Lambotte; J-L Polard; D Huten
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 9.  Modular tapered titanium stems in revision arthroplasty of the hip: The Risk and Causes of Stem Fracture.

Authors:  S Konan; D S Garbuz; B A Masri; C P Duncan
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Assessment of a press-fit proximal femoral modular reconstruction implant (PFMR®) at 14.5 years. A 48-case series with a disturbing rate of implant fracture.

Authors:  Q Dumoulin; S Sabau; T Goetzmann; A Jacquot; F Sirveaux; D Mole; O Roche
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.