Literature DB >> 33771126

Dorsal approach with Glissonian approach for laparoscopic right anatomic liver resections.

Shaohe Wang1,2, Yang Yue1, Wenjie Zhang1, Qiaoyu Liu1, Beicheng Sun1, Xitai Sun1, Decai Yu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy (LAH) has gradually become a routine surgical procedure. However, how to expose the whole hepatic vein and avoid the hepatic vein laceration is still a challenge because of the caudate lobe, particularly in right hepatectomy. We adopted a dorsal approach combined with Glissionian appraoch to perform laparoscopic right anatomic hepatectomy (LRAH).
METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent LRAH from January 2017 to November 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Of these patients, seven patients underwent laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy (LRH group), seven patients who underwent laparoscopic right posterior hepatectomy (LRPH group), and six patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for segment 7 (LS7 group). The paracaval portion of caudate lobe could be transected firstly through dorsal approach and the corresponding major hepatic vein could be exposed from its root to the peripheral branches safely. Due to exposure along the major hepatic vein trunk, the remaining liver parenchyma could be quickly transected from dorsal to cranial side.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 53.8 years and the male: female ratio was 8:12. The median operation time was 306.0 ± 58.2 min and the mean estimated volume of blood loss was 412.5 ± 255.4 mL. The mean duration of postoperative hospital stay was 10.2 days. The mean Pringle maneuver time was 64.8 ± 27.7 min. Five patients received transfusion of 2-4 U of red blood cells. Two patients suffered from transient hepatic dysfunction and one suffered from pleural effusion. None of the patients underwent conversion to an open procedure. The operative duration, volume of the blood loss, Pringle maneuver time, and postoperative hospital stay duration did not differ significantly among the LRH, LRPH, and LS7 groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Dorsal approach combined with Glissonian approach for right lobe is feasible and effective in laparoscopic right anatomic liver resections.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dorsal approach; Hepatectomy; Laparoscopy; Surgical procedure

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33771126      PMCID: PMC7995593          DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01726-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1471-230X            Impact factor:   3.067


  27 in total

1.  Safe and feasible extrahepatic Glissonean access in laparoscopic anatomical liver resection.

Authors:  Akihiro Cho; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Osamu Kainuma; Hiroaki Souda; Atsushi Ikeda; Nobuhiro Takiguchi; Matsuo Nagata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The laparoscopic Glissonian approach is safe and efficient when compared with standard laparoscopic liver resection: Results of an observational study over 7 years.

Authors:  Marcel Autran C Machado; Rodrigo C Surjan; Tiago Basseres; Erik Schadde; Frederico P Costa; Fábio F Makdissi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Operative techniques to avoid near misses during laparoscopic hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Vimalraj Velayutham; David Fuks; Frederic Mal; Norihiro Kokudo; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Intrahepatic Glissonean Pedicle Approach to Segment 7 from the Dorsal Side During Laparoscopic Anatomic Hepatectomy of the Cranial Part of the Right Liver.

Authors:  Yukihiro Okuda; Goro Honda; Shin Kobayashi; Katsunori Sakamoto; Yuki Homma; Masahiko Honjo; Manami Doi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  A double blinded prospective randomized trial comparing the effect of anatomic versus non-anatomic resection on hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence.

Authors:  Xiaobin Feng; Yongjie Su; Shuguo Zheng; Feng Xia; Kuansheng Ma; Jun Yan; Xiaowu Li; Wei Tang; Shuguang Wang; Ping Bie; Jiahong Dong
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kai Feng; Jun Yan; Xiaowu Li; Feng Xia; Kuansheng Ma; Shuguang Wang; Ping Bie; Jiahong Dong
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Duration of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Major Hepatectomy With Extrahepatic Bile Duct Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Gen Sugawara; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tomoki Ebata; Takashi Mizuno; Tetsuya Yagi; Masahiko Ando; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Laparoscopic liver resection: the current status and the future.

Authors:  Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.293

9.  Survival Benefits of Small Anatomical Resection of the Liver for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Impaired Liver Function, Based on New-Era Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Masahiko Sakoda; Shinichi Ueno; Satoshi Iino; Kiyokazu Hiwatashi; Koji Minami; Yota Kawasaki; Hiroshi Kurahara; Yuko Mataki; Kosei Maemura; Hiroyuki Shinchi; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 10.  Current status of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hanisah Guro; Jai Young Cho; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo-Seok Yoon; YoungRok Choi; Mohan Periyasamy
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.