Literature DB >> 33771071

Emergence of new phylogenetic lineage of Influenza D virus with broad antigenicity in California, United States.

Chen Huang1, Jieshi Yu1, Ben M Hause2, Jie Yeun Park2, Chithra Sreenivasan1, Tirth Uprety1, Zizhang Sheng3, Dan Wang1, Feng Li1.   

Abstract

Influenza D virus (IDV), with bovines as a primary host, circulates widely in cattle populations across North America and Eurasia. Here we report the identification of a novel IDV group with broad antigenicity in U.S. bovine herds, which is genetically different from previously known lineages of IDV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Influenza D; antigenicity; genetic lineage; hemagglutinin-esterase fusion; variation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33771071      PMCID: PMC8043534          DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1910078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect        ISSN: 2222-1751            Impact factor:   7.163


Influenza D virus (IDV) is a newly identified member of the family Orthomyxoviridae. Since its first identification in the United States, IDV and its antibody prevalence have been reported in North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa [1-3]. IDV utilizes cattle as a primary reservoir with a broad host range. To date, IDV isolations are largely from cattle and to some extent, from pigs, while IDV RNA genomes and/or specific antibodies have been detected in multiple animal species including goats, sheep, horses, buffalo, camels and wild boars [1-3]. IDV infection causes mild respiratory disease in cattle [4] and is associated with the bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex [5-7] with a major economic impact to the cattle industry. Importantly, antibodies against IDV have also been reported in humans, especially those previously exposed to cattle [8,9]. Based on the nucleotide sequences of the Hemagglutinin-Esterase Fusion (HEF) protein that is the primary target of virus-neutralizing antibodies, IDV can be classified into four distinctive lineages, D/OK, D/660, D/Yama2016, and D/Yama2019 [10,11]. Here, we report the isolation of three novel influenza D viruses from diseased bovines with respiratory disease in California, United States. Characterization of the genome sequences and antigenic properties found that the three isolates formed a distinctive lineage, designated D/CA2019, which is genetically distinct from previously known IDV lineages. Significantly, the novel lineage exhibited broader antigenicity when compared to IDV D/OK and D/660 lineages that have widely spread through U.S. bovine population. In this study, total 100 nasal swabs were collected by the herd veterinarian from calves exhibiting respiratory disease at commercial operations in 2018–2019. Of them, 10 samples tested positive for IDV in RT–PCR assay (10%, 10/100) were inoculated individually onto human rectal tumour HRT-18G cells, then subsequently passaged to swine testicle ST cells. When a cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed in ST cells, supernatants were collected and tested for the presence of hemagglutination (HA) using 0.5% of turkey red blood cells. Following successful virus isolation and initial genome sequencing, six of them were further employed for full-genome sequencing by MiSeq. Sequences were submitted to GenBank: D/bovine/Michigan/0377/2019 (D/MI/0377/2019) (MW632171-MW632177), D/bovine/California/1490/2018 (D/CA/1490/2018) (MW632178-MW632184), D/bovine/Oklahoma/1544/2018 (D/OK/1544/2018) (MW632185-MW632191), D/bovine/California/0363/2019 (D/CA/19) (MW020305-MW020311), D/bovine/California/1908/2019 (D/CA/1908/2019) (MW020319-MW020325) and D/bovine/California/0894/2019 (D/CA/0894/2019) (MW020312-MW020318). To examine the evolutionary relationship of these new isolates to previously characterized IDVs, we performed phylogenetic analysis of the HEF segment sequences in MEGA-X, together with a total of 61genome sequences deposited in GenBank from 2013 to 2020. Three of six new isolates clustered together, forming a lineage that is genetically distinguishable from all the known IDV strains (Figure 1(A)). The novel group is provisionally designated IDV D/CA2019 lineage. Other three isolates belong to D/660 and D/OK lineages, respectively. The pairwise alignment of the HEF amino acid sequence of one representative strain of the D/CA2019 lineage with its counterpart in representative strains of four IDV lineages (D/OK, D/660, D/Yama2016, and D/Yama2019) revealed that D/CA2019 exhibited lower sequence homology with each of the previously identified lineages (94.58%–95.63%) (Figure 1(B)). The phylogenetic trees were also generated for other genome segments of D/CA2019 lineage isolates. Segments of D/CA2019 isolates were clustered together (Figure S1). The segments 1–2, and 5–7 of D/CA2019 isolates were phylogenetically close to representative strain D/bovine/Oklahoma/660/2013 (D/660/13) of D/660 lineage (Figure S1A,B, D–F). Nevertheless, their segment 3 grouped with D/swine/Oklahoma/1334/2011 (D/OK/11) strain, a representative strain of D/OK lineage (Figure S1C).
Figure 1.

D/CA2019 is genetically and antigenically distinct from previously known lineages of IDV. (A) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree for the HEF segments of IDVs. Nucleotide sequences of the HEF segment were aligned and analysed using MEGA-X, with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap scores of at least 50 were shown to the left of the major nodes. Scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site. The branch of three D/CA2019 isolates from California was indicated in red colour. Lineages and their representative strains were labelled with different colours. New IDV isolates used in this study were bolded. (B) Similarities of amino acid sequences of the IDV HEF gene were analysed in the DNAMAN_8 software. Antigenecity of D/CA2019-lineage viruses was analysed by using rabbit (C) and guinea pig (D) antisera in HI assay. HI titres were mean titres from four independent experiments. Standard errors of the mean (SEM) were shown in parentheses.

D/CA2019 is genetically and antigenically distinct from previously known lineages of IDV. (A) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree for the HEF segments of IDVs. Nucleotide sequences of the HEF segment were aligned and analysed using MEGA-X, with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap scores of at least 50 were shown to the left of the major nodes. Scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site. The branch of three D/CA2019 isolates from California was indicated in red colour. Lineages and their representative strains were labelled with different colours. New IDV isolates used in this study were bolded. (B) Similarities of amino acid sequences of the IDV HEF gene were analysed in the DNAMAN_8 software. Antigenecity of D/CA2019-lineage viruses was analysed by using rabbit (C) and guinea pig (D) antisera in HI assay. HI titres were mean titres from four independent experiments. Standard errors of the mean (SEM) were shown in parentheses. To characterize the antigenic properties of new IDV isolates and further elucidate whether genetic divergence observed in D/CA2019 group correlates to antigenic variation, we performed a hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay using rabbit reference antisera raised against semi-purified virus particle preparations from three IDV lineage-representative strains, D/OK/11, D/660/13, and D/CA/19. As summarized in Figure 1(C), the antiserum for the D/CA/19 strain reacted to itself (homologous) as well as to other two new isolates equally with an HI titre of 2560. Interestingly, the antiserum generated against the D/CA/19 strain also effectively recognized D/OK and D/660 lineages with HI titres of 640–2560. In contrast, the rabbit antisera raised against D/OK/11 or D/660/13 virus inefficiently recognized IDV D/CA2019 lineage viruses, with titres 4–8 fold lower than the homologous titre against D/OK/11 and with titres 3.4–12 fold lower than the homologous titre against D/660/13, respectively. These results clearly indicate that three D/CA2019 lineage isolates are antigenically different from D/OK and D/660 lineages, which correlate with the genetic variation observed among these viruses (Figure 1(A)). Our data also reveal that new IDV D/CA2019 lineage exhibits broad antigenicity, which may enable this group of viruses to elicit antibodies that can broadly neutralize diverse strains of IDV. Antigenic variation between D/CA2019 and other two lineages was also further demonstrated in the HI assay using post-infection guinea antisera raised against three cell culture-propagated lineage-representative viruses as described above (Figure 1(C)). As summarized in Figure 1(D), IDVs in D/OK lineage were well recognized by the guinea pig antisera raised against the D/CA/19 virus at HI titres of 100–320, which were identical or higher when compared to the lineage-homologous titres for viruses in D/OK (HI titres: 50–320) lineage. IDVs in D/660 lineage were also readily reactive to the D/CA/19 guinea pig antisera with HI a titre of 200 for D/660/13 virus or 60 for other two viruses in D/660 lineage, which was slightly lower (within 2-fold) when compared to the homologous HI titre for D/660/13 virus (HI titre: 320) but was relatively higher than the lineage-homologous HI titre for other two viruses (HI titre: 40) within D/660 lineage. IDVs in D/CA2019 lineage were efficiently recognized by the guinea pig anti-D/CA/19 sera at HI titres of 320. Nevertheless, all three IDV/CA2019 lineage viruses were poorly recognized by the guinea pig antiserum raised against D/OK/11 and D/660/13 viruses, with titres at least 8-fold lower than the homologous titre of anti-D/OK/11 or anti-D/660/13 sera, respectively (Figure 1(D)). Antibody cross reactivity in guinea pigs further support our conclusion that D/CA2019 represents a novel lineage that is genetically and antigenically different from D/OK and D/660 lineages. In summary, we identified a novel phylogenetic group of IDV strains in diseased bovines in California. This new group, D/CA2019, represents the fifth genetic lineage of IDV (Figure 1(A)). The anti-D/OK/11 and anti-D/660/13 sera had limited cross-reactivity to the viruses in the D/CA2019 lineage but the anti-D/CA/19 sera had broad cross-reactivity to multiple viruses in the other two lineages (Figure 1(C,D)) currently circulating in the U.S. bovine and pig populations, which indicats that D/CA2019 may evade the immune responses that were mounted previously against D/OK and D/660 lineages. In addition, contemporary strains representative of D/OK and D/660 lineages and their respective reference antisera are probably needed in future influenza D virus research because new isolates of D/OK or D/660 lineage appeared to diverge substantially in HI-based antigenicity assay from the past lineage-representative strain D/OK/11 or D/660/13 (Figure 1(C,D)). Overall, our new finding highlights a critical need for future surveillance of D/CA2019 lineage-like viruses in the U.S. agricultural animals toward better understanding the spread and pathogenicity of this novel IDV lineage. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  11 in total

1.  A metagenomics and case-control study to identify viruses associated with bovine respiratory disease.

Authors:  Terry Fei Fan Ng; Nikola O Kondov; Xutao Deng; Alison Van Eenennaam; Holly L Neibergs; Eric Delwart
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Novel Influenza D virus: Epidemiology, pathology, evolution and biological characteristics.

Authors:  Shuo Su; Xinliang Fu; Gairu Li; Fiona Kerlin; Michael Veit
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 5.882

3.  Metagenomic characterization of the virome associated with bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle identified novel viruses and suggests an etiologic role for influenza D virus.

Authors:  Namita Mitra; Natalia Cernicchiaro; Siddartha Torres; Feng Li; Ben M Hause
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 4.  The first decade of research advances in influenza D virus.

Authors:  Jieshi Yu; Feng Li; Dan Wang
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.891

5.  Serologic evidence of exposure to influenza D virus among persons with occupational contact with cattle.

Authors:  Sarah K White; Wenjun Ma; Clinton J McDaniel; Gregory C Gray; John A Lednicky
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Antigenic heterogeneity among phylogenetic clusters of influenza D viruses.

Authors:  Tomoha Odagiri; Hiroho Ishida; Jun-You Li; Maiko Endo; Tomoya Kobayashi; Haruhiko Kamiki; Hiromichi Matsugo; Akiko Takenaka-Uema; Shin Murakami; Taisuke Horimoto
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 7.  Emerging Influenza D Virus Threat: What We Know so Far!

Authors:  Kumari Asha; Binod Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Respiratory viruses identified in western Canadian beef cattle by metagenomic sequencing and their association with bovine respiratory disease.

Authors:  Maodong Zhang; Janet E Hill; Champika Fernando; Trevor W Alexander; Edouard Timsit; Frank van der Meer; Yanyun Huang
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 5.005

9.  Influenza D Virus of New Phylogenetic Lineage, Japan.

Authors:  Shin Murakami; Ryota Sato; Hiroho Ishida; Misa Katayama; Akiko Takenaka-Uema; Taisuke Horimoto
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Influenza D Virus: Serological Evidence in the Italian Population from 2005 to 2017.

Authors:  Claudia M Trombetta; Serena Marchi; Ilaria Manini; Otfried Kistner; Feng Li; Pietro Piu; Alessandro Manenti; Fabrizio Biuso; Chithra Sreenivasan; Julian Druce; Emanuele Montomoli
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 5.048

View more
  8 in total

1.  Experimental Infection of Horses with Influenza D Virus.

Authors:  Chithra C Sreenivasan; Tirth Uprety; Stephanie E Reedy; Gun Temeeyasen; Ben M Hause; Dan Wang; Feng Li; Thomas M Chambers
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.818

2.  Isolation and development of bovine primary respiratory cells as model to study influenza D virus infection.

Authors:  Tirth Uprety; Chithra C Sreenivasan; Shaurav Bhattarai; Dan Wang; Radhey S Kaushik; Feng Li
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.513

3.  Construction of an Influenza D Virus with an Eight-Segmented Genome.

Authors:  Hiroho Ishida; Shin Murakami; Haruhiko Kamiki; Hiromichi Matsugo; Misa Katayama; Wataru Sekine; Kosuke Ohira; Akiko Takenaka-Uema; Taisuke Horimoto
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Characterization of Influenza D Virus in Danish Calves.

Authors:  Nicole B Goecke; Yuan Liang; Nina D Otten; Charlotte K Hjulsager; Lars E Larsen
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  Identification of D/Yama2019 Lineage-Like Influenza D Virus in Chinese Cattle.

Authors:  Jieshi Yu; Tianyu Li; Zhenyu Wen; Siyu Wu; Zhilin Wang; Jiaying Zheng; Mingwang Chen; Faming Chen; Wen-Kang Wei; Shao-Lun Zhai; Ming Liao
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 6.  Understanding the mechanisms of viral and bacterial coinfections in bovine respiratory disease: a comprehensive literature review of experimental evidence.

Authors:  Maria Gaudino; Brandy Nagamine; Mariette F Ducatez; Gilles Meyer
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.829

7.  Detection of antibodies against influenza D virus in swine veterinarians in Italy in 2004.

Authors:  Claudia Maria Trombetta; Emanuele Montomoli; Ilaria Di Bartolo; Fabio Ostanello; Chiara Chiapponi; Serena Marchi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 20.693

Review 8.  Host Range, Biology, and Species Specificity of Seven-Segmented Influenza Viruses-A Comparative Review on Influenza C and D.

Authors:  Chithra C Sreenivasan; Zizhang Sheng; Dan Wang; Feng Li
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-12-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.