Literature DB >> 33770365

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adding Daratumumab to a Regimen of Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Xiaohui Zeng1, Qiao Liu2, Liubao Peng2, Ye Peng2, Lidan Yi2, Xia Luo2, Sini Li2, Xiaomin Wan3, Chongqing Tan4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ALCYONE trial found that daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (D-VMP) can significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) in China. In the present study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of D-VMP versus VMP for patients with newly diagnosed MM in China.
METHODS: A Markov model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of frontline D-VMP versus VMP for MM. The life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. A series of sensitivity analyses was performed to assess the robustness of the model and address uncertainties in variable estimates. Subgroup analysis was also performed.
RESULTS: D-VMP provided an additional 2.99 LYs and 1.67 QALYs compared with VMP, with incremental $64,920 per LY and $116,015 per QALY gained. The results of the univariable sensitivity analysis showed that the parameter that had the greatest impact on the ICER was the cost of subsequent treatment and daratumumab. When the cost of daratumumab was 100%, 70%, 50%, and 30% of the current price, the probability of D-VMP being cost-effective was 2.49%, 16.11%, 39.09%, and 70.73% at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $30,950/QALY, respectively. The results demonstrated that the ICER in all subgroups remained > $30,950/QALY.
CONCLUSION: D-VMP versus VMP is likely to exceed the commonly accepted values of cost-effectiveness in patients with transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed MM in China.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Cost-effectiveness; Daratumumab; Markov model; Multiple myeloma

Year:  2021        PMID: 33770365     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01699-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  3 in total

1.  Daratumumab vs pomalidomide for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Cynthia L Gong; Ann L Studdert; Michaela Liedtke
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 10.047

2.  Cost-effectiveness of Drugs to Treat Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the United States.

Authors:  Josh J Carlson; Gregory F Guzauskas; Richard H Chapman; Patricia G Synnott; Shanshan Liu; Elizabeth T Russo; Steven D Pearson; Elizabeth D Brouwer; Daniel A Ollendorf
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2018-01

Review 3.  Cognitive Impairment and Family Functioning of Survivors of Pediatric Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sasja A Schepers; Fiona S M Schulte; Sunita K Patel; Kathryn Vannatta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 44.544

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.