Literature DB >> 33770290

The rigid hybrid number for two phylogenetic trees.

Katharina T Huber1, Simone Linz2, Vincent Moulton3.   

Abstract

Recently there has been considerable interest in the problem of finding a phylogenetic network with a minimum number of reticulation vertices which displays a given set of phylogenetic trees, that is, a network with minimum hybrid number. Such networks are useful for representing the evolution of species whose genomes have undergone processes such as lateral gene transfer and recombination that cannot be represented appropriately by a phylogenetic tree. Even so, as was recently pointed out in the literature, insisting that a network displays the set of trees can be an overly restrictive assumption when modeling certain evolutionary phenomena such as incomplete lineage sorting. In this paper, we thus consider the less restrictive notion of rigidly displaying which we introduce and study here. More specifically, we characterize when two trees can be rigidly displayed by a certain type of phylogenetic network called a temporal tree-child network in terms of fork-picking sequences. These are sequences of special subconfigurations of the two trees related to the well-studied cherry-picking sequences. We also show that, in case it exists, the rigid hybrid number for two phylogenetic trees is given by a minimum weight fork-picking sequence for the trees. Finally, we consider the relationship between the rigid hybrid number and three closely related numbers; the weak, beaded, and temporal hybrid numbers. In particular, we show that these numbers can all be different even for a fixed pair of trees, and also present an infinite family of pairs of trees which demonstrates that the difference between the rigid hybrid number and the temporal-hybrid number for two phylogenetic trees on the same set of n leaves can grow at least linearly with n.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beaded tree; Cherry-picking sequence; Fork-picking sequence; Hybrid number; Phylogenetic network; Rigidly displaying; Temporal tree-child network; Weakly displaying

Year:  2021        PMID: 33770290      PMCID: PMC7997861          DOI: 10.1007/s00285-021-01594-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  13 in total

1.  Bounding the number of hybridisation events for a consistent evolutionary history.

Authors:  Mihaela Baroni; Stefan Grünewald; Vincent Moulton; Charles Semple
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Phylogenetic networks: modeling, reconstructibility, and accuracy.

Authors:  Bernard M E Moret; Luay Nakhleh; Tandy Warnow; C Randal Linder; Anna Tholse; Anneke Padolina; Jerry Sun; Ruth Timme
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Computing the hybridization number of two phylogenetic trees is fixed-parameter tractable.

Authors:  Magnus Bordewich; Charles Semple
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Networks: expanding evolutionary thinking.

Authors:  Eric Bapteste; Leo van Iersel; Axel Janke; Scot Kelchner; Steven Kelk; James O McInerney; David A Morrison; Luay Nakhleh; Mike Steel; Leen Stougie; James Whitfield
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Cherry picking: a characterization of the temporal hybridization number for a set of phylogenies.

Authors:  Peter J Humphries; Simone Linz; Charles Semple
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Metrics for phylogenetic networks II: nodal and triplets metrics.

Authors:  Gabriel Cardona; Mercè Llabrés; Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Comparison of tree-child phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Gabriel Cardona; Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Displayed Trees Do Not Determine Distinguishability Under the Network Multispecies Coalescent.

Authors:  Sha Zhu; James H Degnan
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  Phylogenetic networks from multi-labelled trees.

Authors:  K T Huber; V Moulton
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.164

10.  Folding and unfolding phylogenetic trees and networks.

Authors:  Katharina T Huber; Vincent Moulton; Mike Steel; Taoyang Wu
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.259

View more
  1 in total

1.  The hybrid number of a ploidy profile.

Authors:  K T Huber; L J Maher
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.164

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.