Sanne Kaelen1, Wilma van den Boogaard2, Umberto Pellecchia2, Sofie Spiers1, Caroline De Cramer1, Gwennin Demaegd1, Edouard Fouqueray1, Rafael Van den Bergh1, Stephanie Goublomme1, Tom Decroo3, Muriel Quinet4, Elke Van Hoof5,6,7, Bertrand Draguez1. 1. Belgium Covid-19 Project, Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Centre Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. 2. Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Centre Brussels, Operational Research Unit (LuxOR), Luxembourg, Luxembourg/Brussels, Belgium. 3. Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium. 4. Iriscare, Public Health Institute, Brussels, Belgium. 5. Working Group on the Psychosocial Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Within the Superior Health Council, Brussels, Belgium. 6. Mental Health Sub-working Group, GEES, Brussels, Belgium. 7. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nursing homes (NH) for the elderly have been particularly affected by the Covid-19 pandemic mainly due to their hosted vulnerable populations and poor outbreak preparedness. In Belgium, the medical humanitarian organization Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) implemented a support project for NH including training on infection prevention and control (IPC), (re)-organization of care, and psychosocial support for NH staff. As psychosocial and mental health needs of NH residents in times of Covid-19 are poorly understood and addressed, this study aimed to better understand these needs and how staff could respond accordingly. METHODS: A qualitative study adopting thematic content analysis. Eight focus group discussions with direct caring staff and 56 in-depth interviews with residents were conducted in eight purposively and conveniently selected NHs in Brussels, Belgium, June 2020. RESULTS: NH residents experienced losses of freedom, social life, autonomy, and recreational activities that deprived them of their basic psychological needs. This had a massive impact on their mental well-being expressed in feeling depressed, anxious, and frustrated as well as decreased meaning and quality of life. Staff felt unprepared for the challenges posed by the pandemic; lacking guidelines, personal protective equipment and clarity around organization of care. They were confronted with professional and ethical dilemmas, feeling 'trapped' between IPC and the residents' wellbeing. They witnessed the detrimental effects of the measures imposed on their residents. CONCLUSION: This study revealed the insights of residents' and NH staff at the height of the early Covid-19 pandemic. Clearer outbreak plans, including psychosocial support, could have prevented the aggravated mental health conditions of both residents and staff. A holistic approach is needed in NHs in which tailor-made essential restrictive IPC measures are combined with psychosocial support measures to reduce the impact on residents' mental health impact and to enhance their quality of life.
BACKGROUND: Nursing homes (NH) for the elderly have been particularly affected by the Covid-19 pandemic mainly due to their hosted vulnerable populations and poor outbreak preparedness. In Belgium, the medical humanitarian organization Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) implemented a support project for NH including training on infection prevention and control (IPC), (re)-organization of care, and psychosocial support for NH staff. As psychosocial and mental health needs of NH residents in times of Covid-19 are poorly understood and addressed, this study aimed to better understand these needs and how staff could respond accordingly. METHODS: A qualitative study adopting thematic content analysis. Eight focus group discussions with direct caring staff and 56 in-depth interviews with residents were conducted in eight purposively and conveniently selected NHs in Brussels, Belgium, June 2020. RESULTS: NH residents experienced losses of freedom, social life, autonomy, and recreational activities that deprived them of their basic psychological needs. This had a massive impact on their mental well-being expressed in feeling depressed, anxious, and frustrated as well as decreased meaning and quality of life. Staff felt unprepared for the challenges posed by the pandemic; lacking guidelines, personal protective equipment and clarity around organization of care. They were confronted with professional and ethical dilemmas, feeling 'trapped' between IPC and the residents' wellbeing. They witnessed the detrimental effects of the measures imposed on their residents. CONCLUSION: This study revealed the insights of residents' and NH staff at the height of the early Covid-19 pandemic. Clearer outbreak plans, including psychosocial support, could have prevented the aggravated mental health conditions of both residents and staff. A holistic approach is needed in NHs in which tailor-made essential restrictive IPC measures are combined with psychosocial support measures to reduce the impact on residents' mental health impact and to enhance their quality of life.
Authors: Eleanor Quested; Jos A Bosch; Victoria E Burns; Jennifer Cumming; Nikos Ntoumanis; Joan L Duda Journal: J Sport Exerc Psychol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.016
Authors: Ziggi Ivan Santini; Paul E Jose; Erin York Cornwell; Ai Koyanagi; Line Nielsen; Carsten Hinrichsen; Charlotte Meilstrup; Katrine R Madsen; Vibeke Koushede Journal: Lancet Public Health Date: 2020-01
Authors: Adam L Gordon; Claire Goodman; Wilco Achterberg; Robert O Barker; Eileen Burns; Barbara Hanratty; Finbarr C Martin; Julienne Meyer; Desmond O'Neill; Jos Schols; Karen Spilsbury Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Adrianna Senczyszyn; Katarzyna M Lion; Dorota Szcześniak; Elżbieta Trypka; Justyna Mazurek; Marta Ciułkowicz; Maria Maćkowiak; Marta Duda-Sikuła; Renata Wallner; Joanna Rymaszewska Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-09-19 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Hilde Verbeek; Debby L Gerritsen; Ramona Backhaus; Bram S de Boer; Raymond T C M Koopmans; Jan P H Hamers Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: M Inzitari; E Risco; M Cesari; B M Buurman; K Kuluski; V Davey; L Bennett; J Varela; J Prvu Bettger Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Yuanxin Xue; Jillian Lopes; Kimberly Ritchie; Andrea M D'Alessandro; Laura Banfield; Randi E McCabe; Alexandra Heber; Ruth A Lanius; Margaret C McKinnon Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Christian Hering; Annabell Gangnus; Andrea Budnick; Raphael Kohl; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen; Adelheid Kuhlmey; Paul Gellert Journal: BMC Nurs Date: 2022-02-10
Authors: Barbara Plagg; Giuliano Piccoliori; Adolf Engl; Christian J Wiedermann; Angelika Mahlknecht; Verena Barbieri; Dietmar Ausserhofer; Peter Koler; Sara Tauber; Manuela Lechner; Walter A Lorenz; Andreas Conca; Klaus Eisendle Journal: Geriatrics (Basel) Date: 2022-03-17
Authors: Inge A H Knippenberg; Ruslan Leontjevas; Johanna M H Nijsten; Christian Bakker; Raymond T C M Koopmans; Debby L Gerritsen Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-02-19 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Ammar Saad; Olivia Magwood; Joseph Benjamen; Rinila Haridas; Syeda Shanza Hashmi; Vincent Girard; Shahab Sayfi; Ubabuko Unachukwu; Melody Rowhani; Arunika Agarwal; Michelle Fleming; Angelina Filip; Kevin Pottie Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sarah Sims; Ruth Harris; Shereen Hussein; Anne Marie Rafferty; Amit Desai; Sinead Palmer; Sally Brearley; Richard Adams; Lindsay Rees; Joanne M Fitzpatrick Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Suzie Noten; Annerieke Stoop; Jasper De Witte; Elleke Landeweer; Floor Vinckers; Nina Hovenga; Leonieke C van Boekel; Katrien G Luijkx Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390