BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is characterized by a rapid change in the patient's condition, with major changes occurring over a few days. We aimed to develop and evaluate an emergency system for monitoring patients with COVID-19, which may be useful in hospitals where more severe patients stay in their homes. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The system consists of the home-based patient unit, which is set up around the patient and the hospital unit, which enables the medical staff to telemonitor the patient's condition and help to send medical recommendations. The home unit allows the data transmission from the patient to the hospital, which is performed using a cell phone application. The hospital unit includes a virtual instrument developed in LabVIEW® environment that can provide a real-time monitoring of the oxygen saturation (SpO2), beats per minute (BPM), body temperature (BT), and peak expiratory flow (PEF). Abnormal events may be fast and automatically identified. After the design details are described, the system is validated by a 30-day home monitoring study in 12 controls and 12 patients with COVID-19 presenting asymptomatic to mild disease. Patients presented reduced SpO2 (p<0.0001) and increased BPM values (p<0.0001). Three patients (25%) presented PEF values between 50 and 80% of the predicted. Three of the 12 monitored patients presented events of desaturation (SpO2<92%). The experimental results were in close agreement with the involved pathophysiology, providing clear evidence that the proposed system can be a useful tool for the remote monitoring of patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: An emergency system for home monitoring of patients with COVID-19 was developed in the current study. The proposed system allowed us to quickly respond to early abnormalities in these patients. This system may contribute to conserving hospital resources for those most in need while simultaneously enabling early recognition of patients under acute deterioration, requiring urgent assessment.
BACKGROUND:COVID-19 is characterized by a rapid change in the patient's condition, with major changes occurring over a few days. We aimed to develop and evaluate an emergency system for monitoring patients with COVID-19, which may be useful in hospitals where more severe patients stay in their homes. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The system consists of the home-based patient unit, which is set up around the patient and the hospital unit, which enables the medical staff to telemonitor the patient's condition and help to send medical recommendations. The home unit allows the data transmission from the patient to the hospital, which is performed using a cell phone application. The hospital unit includes a virtual instrument developed in LabVIEW® environment that can provide a real-time monitoring of the oxygen saturation (SpO2), beats per minute (BPM), body temperature (BT), and peak expiratory flow (PEF). Abnormal events may be fast and automatically identified. After the design details are described, the system is validated by a 30-day home monitoring study in 12 controls and 12 patients with COVID-19 presenting asymptomatic to mild disease. Patients presented reduced SpO2 (p<0.0001) and increased BPM values (p<0.0001). Three patients (25%) presented PEF values between 50 and 80% of the predicted. Three of the 12 monitored patients presented events of desaturation (SpO2<92%). The experimental results were in close agreement with the involved pathophysiology, providing clear evidence that the proposed system can be a useful tool for the remote monitoring of patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: An emergency system for home monitoring of patients with COVID-19 was developed in the current study. The proposed system allowed us to quickly respond to early abnormalities in these patients. This system may contribute to conserving hospital resources for those most in need while simultaneously enabling early recognition of patients under acute deterioration, requiring urgent assessment.
Authors: Rashid Bashshur; Charles R Doarn; Julio M Frenk; Joseph C Kvedar; James O Woolliscroft Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: William V Padula; Marlea A Miano; Marcella A Kelley; Samuel A Crawford; Bryson H Choy; Robert M Hughes; Riley Grosso; Peter J Pronovost Journal: Value Health Date: 2021-10-23 Impact factor: 5.101
Authors: Iván de Jesús Ascencio-Montiel; Juan Carlos Tomás-López; Verónica Álvarez-Medina; Luisa Estela Gil-Velázquez; Hortensia Vega-Vega; Héctor Raúl Vargas-Sánchez; Manuel Cervantes-Ocampo; Miguel Ángel Villasís-Keever; Cesar Raúl González-Bonilla; Célida Duque-Molina Journal: Arch Med Res Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 8.323
Authors: Cecilia Vindrola-Padros; Kelly E Singh; Manbinder S Sidhu; Theo Georghiou; Chris Sherlaw-Johnson; Sonila M Tomini; Matthew Inada-Kim; Karen Kirkham; Allison Streetly; Nathan Cohen; Naomi J Fulop Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2021-06-23
Authors: Ahmed Alboksmaty; Thomas Beaney; Sarah Elkin; Jonathan M Clarke; Ara Darzi; Paul Aylin; Ana-Luísa Neves Journal: Lancet Digit Health Date: 2022-04