Literature DB >> 33770091

Comparative population genomic analyses of transporters within the Asgard archaeal superphylum.

Steven Russum1, Katie Jing Kay Lam1, Nicholas Alan Wong1, Vasu Iddamsetty1, Kevin J Hendargo1, Jianing Wang1, Aditi Dubey1, Yichi Zhang1, Arturo Medrano-Soto1, Milton H Saier1.   

Abstract

Upon discovery of the first archaeal species in the 1970s, life has been subdivided into three domains: Eukarya, Archaea, and Bacteria. However, the organization of the three-domain tree of life has been challenged following the discovery of archaeal lineages such as the TACK and Asgard superphyla. The Asgard Superphylum has emerged as the closest archaeal ancestor to eukaryotes, potentially improving our understanding of the evolution of life forms. We characterized the transportomes and their substrates within four metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), that is, Odin-, Thor-, Heimdall- and Loki-archaeota as well as the fully sequenced genome of Candidatus Prometheoarchaeum syntrophicum strain MK-D1 that belongs to the Loki phylum. Using the Transporter Classification Database (TCDB) as reference, candidate transporters encoded within the proteomes were identified based on sequence similarity, alignment coverage, compatibility of hydropathy profiles, TMS topologies and shared domains. Identified transport systems were compared within the Asgard superphylum as well as within dissimilar eukaryotic, archaeal and bacterial organisms. From these analyses, we infer that Asgard organisms rely mostly on the transport of substrates driven by the proton motive force (pmf), the proton electrochemical gradient which then can be used for ATP production and to drive the activities of secondary carriers. The results indicate that Asgard archaea depend heavily on the uptake of organic molecules such as lipid precursors, amino acids and their derivatives, and sugars and their derivatives. Overall, the majority of the transporters identified are more similar to prokaryotic transporters than eukaryotic systems although several instances of the reverse were documented. Taken together, the results support the previous suggestions that the Asgard superphylum includes organisms that are largely mixotrophic and anaerobic but more clearly define their metabolic potential while providing evidence regarding their relatedness to eukaryotes.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33770091      PMCID: PMC7997004          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  168 in total

1.  Energy conservation by the H2:heterodisulfide oxidoreductase from Methanosarcina mazei Gö1: identification of two proton-translocating segments.

Authors:  T Ide; S Bäumer; U Deppenmeier
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Tail-anchor targeting by a Get3 tetramer: the structure of an archaeal homologue.

Authors:  Christian J M Suloway; Michael E Rome; William M Clemons
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Lokiarchaeon is hydrogen dependent.

Authors:  Filipa L Sousa; Sinje Neukirchen; John F Allen; Nick Lane; William F Martin
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 17.745

4.  Gene-based predictive models of trophic modes suggest Asgard archaea are not phagocytotic.

Authors:  John A Burns; Alexandros A Pittis; Eunsoo Kim
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  Thermodynamics of the formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase reaction in Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum.

Authors:  P A Bertram; R K Thauer
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1994-12-15

Review 6.  Membrane porters of ATP-binding cassette transport systems are polyphyletic.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Maxim Dukarevich; Eric I Sun; Ming Ren Yen; Milton H Saier
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  TMCO1 Is an ER Ca(2+) Load-Activated Ca(2+) Channel.

Authors:  Qiao-Chu Wang; Qiaoxia Zheng; Haiyan Tan; Bing Zhang; Xiaoling Li; Yuxiu Yang; Jie Yu; Yang Liu; Hao Chai; Xi Wang; Zhongshuai Sun; Jiu-Qiang Wang; Shu Zhu; Fengli Wang; Maojun Yang; Caixia Guo; Heng Wang; Qingyin Zheng; Yang Li; Quan Chen; Aimin Zhou; Tie-Shan Tang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Many roles of the bacterial envelope reducing pathways.

Authors:  Seung-Hyun Cho; Jean-Francois Collet
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 8.401

9.  Asgard archaea capable of anaerobic hydrocarbon cycling.

Authors:  Kiley W Seitz; Nina Dombrowski; Laura Eme; Anja Spang; Jonathan Lombard; Jessica R Sieber; Andreas P Teske; Thijs J G Ettema; Brett J Baker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The reconstruction of 2,631 draft metagenome-assembled genomes from the global oceans.

Authors:  Benjamin J Tully; Elaina D Graham; John F Heidelberg
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 6.444

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Asgard archaea in saline environments.

Authors:  Horia L Banciu; Ionuț M Gridan; Adrian V Zety; Andreea Baricz
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.035

2.  Structural and biochemical evidence for the emergence of a calcium-regulated actin cytoskeleton prior to eukaryogenesis.

Authors:  Caner Akıl; Linh T Tran; Magali Orhant-Prioux; Yohendran Baskaran; Yosuke Senju; Shuichi Takeda; Phatcharin Chotchuang; Duangkamon Muengsaen; Albert Schulte; Edward Manser; Laurent Blanchoin; Robert C Robinson
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-08-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.