Literature DB >> 33770085

Structure of the EphB6 receptor ectodomain.

Emilia O Mason1, Yehuda Goldgur1, Dorothea Robev1, Andrew Freywald2, Dimitar B Nikolov1, Juha P Himanen1.   

Abstract

Eph receptors are the largest group amongst the receptor tyrosine kinases and are divided into two subgroups, A and B, based on ligand binding specificities and sequence conservation. Through ligand-induced and ligand-independent activities, Ephs play central roles in diverse biological processes, including embryo development, regulation of neuronal signaling, immune responses, vasculogenesis, as well as tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis. The Eph extracellular regions (ECDs) are constituted of multiple domains, and previous structural studies of the A class receptors revealed how they interact with ephrin ligands and simultaneously mediate Eph-Eph clustering necessary for biological activity. Specifically, EphA structures highlighted a model, where clustering of ligand-bound receptors relies on two distinct receptor/receptor interfaces. Interestingly, most unliganded A class receptors also form an additional, third interface, between the ligand binding domain (LBD) and the fibronectin III domain (FN3) of neighboring molecules. Structures of B-class Eph ECDs, on the other hand, have never been reported. To further our understanding of Eph receptor function, we crystallized the EphB6-ECD and determined its three-dimensional structure using X-ray crystallography. EphB6 has important functions in both normal physiology and human malignancies and is especially interesting because this atypical receptor innately lacks kinase activity and our understanding of the mechanism of action is still incomplete. Our structural data reveals the overall EphB6-ECD architecture and shows EphB6-LBD/FN3 interactions similar to those observed for the unliganded A class receptors, suggesting that these unusual interactions are of general importance to the Eph group. We also observe unique structural features, which likely reflect the atypical signaling properties of EphB6, namely the need of co-receptor(s) for this kinase-inactive Eph. These findings provide new valuable information on the structural organization and mechanism of action of the B-class Ephs, and specifically EphB6, which in the future will assist in identifying clinically relevant targets for cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33770085      PMCID: PMC7997048          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  70 in total

1.  EphB6-null mutation results in compromised T cell function.

Authors:  Hongyu Luo; Guang Yu; Johanne Tremblay; Jiangping Wu
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of the promiscuous EphA4 receptor reveals two distinct conformations.

Authors:  Nikhil Singla; Yehuda Goldgur; Kai Xu; Sari Paavilainen; Dimitar B Nikolov; Juha P Himanen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Androgen-deprivation therapy with enzalutamide enhances prostate cancer metastasis via decreasing the EPHB6 suppressor expression.

Authors:  Jiaqi Chen; Lei Li; Zhao Yang; Jie Luo; Shuyuan Yeh; Chawnshang Chang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  Overexpressed gene signature of EPH receptor A/B family in cancer patients-comprehensive analyses from the public high-throughput database.

Authors:  Nam Nhut Phan; Shirui Liu; Chih-Yang Wang; Hui-Ping Hsu; Ming-Derg Lai; Chung-Yen Li; Chien-Fu Chen; Chung-Chieh Chiao; Meng-Chi Yen; Zhengda Sun; Jia-Zhen Jiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2020-05-01

5.  High-level expression of EPHB6, EFNB2, and EFNB3 is associated with low tumor stage and high TrkA expression in human neuroblastomas.

Authors:  X X Tang; A E Evans; H Zhao; A Cnaan; W London; S L Cohn; G M Brodeur; N Ikegaki
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Completing the structural family portrait of the human EphB tyrosine kinase domains.

Authors:  Ross C Overman; Judit E Debreczeni; Caroline M Truman; Mark S McAlister; Teresa K Attwood
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  EphB6 promotes anoikis by modulating EphA2 signaling.

Authors:  Mai Akada; Kohei Harada; Manabu Negishi; Hironori Katoh
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.315

8.  The EPHB6 receptor tyrosine kinase is a metastasis suppressor that is frequently silenced by promoter DNA hypermethylation in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jun Yu; Etmar Bulk; Ping Ji; Antje Hascher; Moying Tang; Ralf Metzger; Alessandro Marra; Hubert Serve; Wolfgang E Berdel; Rainer Wiewroth; Steffen Koschmieder; Carsten Müller-Tidow
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Reduced EphB6 protein in gastric carcinoma and associated lymph nodes suggests EphB6 as a gastric tumor and metastasis inhibitor.

Authors:  Jiaxiu Liu; Bin Xu; Guoying Xu; Xiaolei Zhang; Xueyi Yang; Jiandong Wang
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 10.  The role of Eph receptors in cancer and how to target them: novel approaches in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Oscar J Buckens; Btissame El Hassouni; Elisa Giovannetti; Godefridus J Peters
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.206

View more
  2 in total

1.  The intracellular domains of the EphB6 and EphA10 receptor tyrosine pseudokinases function as dynamic signalling hubs.

Authors:  Lung-Yu Liang; Michael Roy; Christopher R Horne; Jarrod J Sandow; Minglyanna Surudoi; Laura F Dagley; Samuel N Young; Toby Dite; Jeffrey J Babon; Peter W Janes; Onisha Patel; James M Murphy; Isabelle S Lucet
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  The Ephb2 Receptor Uses Homotypic, Head-to-Tail Interactions within Its Ectodomain as an Autoinhibitory Control Mechanism.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Dorothea Robev; Nayanendu Saha; Bingcheng Wang; Matthew B Dalva; Kai Xu; Juha P Himanen; Dimitar B Nikolov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.