Literature DB >> 33770084

Improved diagnostic prediction of the pathogenicity of bloodstream isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Shannon M VanAken1, Duane Newton2, J Scott VanEpps1,3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

With an estimated 440,000 active cases occurring each year, medical device associated infections pose a significant burden on the US healthcare system, costing about $9.8 billion in 2013. Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common cause of these device-associated infections, which typically involve isolates that are multi-drug resistant and possess multiple virulence factors. S. epidermidis is also frequently a benign contaminant of otherwise sterile blood cultures. Therefore, tests that distinguish pathogenic from non-pathogenic isolates would improve the accuracy of diagnosis and prevent overuse/misuse of antibiotics. Attempts to use multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) with machine learning for this purpose had poor accuracy (~73%). In this study we sought to improve the diagnostic accuracy of predicting pathogenicity by focusing on phenotypic markers (i.e., antibiotic resistance, growth fitness in human plasma, and biofilm forming capacity) and the presence of specific virulence genes (i.e., mecA, ses1, and sdrF). Commensal isolates from healthy individuals (n = 23), blood culture contaminants (n = 21), and pathogenic isolates considered true bacteremia (n = 54) were used. Multiple machine learning approaches were applied to characterize strains as pathogenic vs non-pathogenic. The combination of phenotypic markers and virulence genes improved the diagnostic accuracy to 82.4% (sensitivity: 84.9% and specificity: 80.9%). Oxacillin resistance was the most important variable followed by growth rate in plasma. This work shows promise for the addition of phenotypic testing in clinical diagnostic applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33770084      PMCID: PMC7997010          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  59 in total

1.  In-vivo transfer of mecA DNA to Staphylococcus aureus [corrected].

Authors:  C L Wielders; M R Vriens; S Brisse; L A de Graaf-Miltenburg; A Troelstra; A Fleer; F J Schmitz; J Verhoef; A C Fluit
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-05-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Are coagulase-negative staphylococci virulent?

Authors:  C Heilmann; W Ziebuhr; K Becker
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Determination of clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci in blood cultures.

Authors:  Asiye Karakullukçu; Mert Ahmet Kuşkucu; Sevgi Ergin; Gökhan Aygün; Kenan Midilli; Ömer Küçükbasmaci
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 4.  Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis in diverse host environments.

Authors:  Divya Balasubramanian; Lamia Harper; Bo Shopsin; Victor J Torres
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 5.  Staphylococcus epidermidis--the 'accidental' pathogen.

Authors:  Michael Otto
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Related clones containing SCCmec type IV predominate among clinically significant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates.

Authors:  Hilmar Wisplinghoff; Adriana E Rosato; Mark C Enright; Michael Noto; William Craig; Gordon L Archer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Staphylococcus haemolyticus - an emerging threat in the twilight of the antibiotics age.

Authors:  Tomasz Czekaj; Marcin Ciszewski; Eligia M Szewczyk
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.777

8.  Comparative study of virulence factors among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates.

Authors:  Ons Haddad; Abderrahmen Merghni; Aida Elargoubi; Hajer Rhim; Yosr Kadri; Maha Mastouri
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Multilocus Sequence Typing for Interpreting Blood Isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Prannda Sharma; Ashley E Satorius; Marika R Raff; Adriana Rivera; Duane W Newton; John G Younger
Journal:  Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis       Date:  2014-03-02

10.  Disease-associated genotypes of the commensal skin bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Guillaume Méric; Leonardos Mageiros; Johan Pensar; Maisem Laabei; Koji Yahara; Ben Pascoe; Nattinee Kittiwan; Phacharaporn Tadee; Virginia Post; Sarah Lamble; Rory Bowden; James E Bray; Mario Morgenstern; Keith A Jolley; Martin C J Maiden; Edward J Feil; Xavier Didelot; Maria Miragaia; Herminia de Lencastre; T Fintan Moriarty; Holger Rohde; Ruth Massey; Dietrich Mack; Jukka Corander; Samuel K Sheppard
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Staphylococcus pettenkoferi.

Authors:  Marta Kierzkowska; Kinga Markowska; Anna Majewska
Journal:  Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2022-02-11

Review 2.  Look Who's Talking: Host and Pathogen Drivers of Staphylococcus epidermidis Virulence in Neonatal Sepsis.

Authors:  Isabella A Joubert; Michael Otto; Tobias Strunk; Andrew J Currie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.