| Literature DB >> 33769847 |
Errol M Thomson1,2, Alain Filiatreault1, Andrew Williams1, Christopher F Rider3, Chris Carlsten3,4.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33769847 PMCID: PMC7997608 DOI: 10.1289/EHP8923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Figure 1.Time course of plasma cortisol response to exposure. Participants () took the antioxidant NAC or placebo capsules three times daily for 6 d, followed by a 2-h inhalation exposure, leading to the following three experimental conditions: FAP, DEP, and DEN. Plasma cortisol was repeatedly measured pre- and post exposure at the times indicated. Data were assessed using a generalized estimating equation and adjusted according to the Holm-Sidak approach. Results are presented with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance is displayed for comparisons of treatments within a given time point. Note: DEN, diesel exhaust with NAC; DEP, diesel exhaust with placebo; FAP, filtered air with placebo; NAC, N-acetylcysteine.
Figure 2.Cortisol response to exposure according to sex, asthma diagnosis, GSTM1 status (present or null) and GS (high or low). The change (delta) in log cortisol levels from 0 to 2-h time points for DEP or DEN exposures was compared to the delta over that same period for the FAP exposure. Analyses were conducted using the generalized estimating equation approach and adjusted according to the Holm-Sidak multiple comparison procedure. Results are presented with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance is indicated relative to the FAP exposure. DEN vs. DEP comparisons were all nonsignificant and for simplicity are not shown here. Note: DEN, diesel exhaust with NAC; DEP, diesel exhaust with placebo; FAP, filtered air with placebo; GS, genetic risk score; NAC, N-acetylcysteine.