| Literature DB >> 33769134 |
Yanan Liu1, Hong Ren2, Jing Guo1, Dan Su1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to explore the effect of continuous nursing care on children with pneumonia, including patient survival and quality of life.Entities:
Keywords: Pneumonia; complications; continuous care; effectiveness; nursing; patient satisfaction
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33769134 PMCID: PMC8165847 DOI: 10.1177/0300060521993691
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Figure 1.Flow chart of selection for children with pneumonia.
General patient information.
| Group | Sex (n) | Age (years) | Temperature (°C) | Disease course (days) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||
| Routine group | 25 | 20 | 5.46 ± 1.21 | 39.5 ± 0.40 | 2.95 ± 1.40 |
| Continuous group | 23 | 22 | 5.72 ± 1.15 | 39.4 ± 0.50 | 2.90 ± 1.50 |
| χ2/ | 0.179 | 1.045 | 1.048 | 0.164 | |
| P | 0.672 | 0.299 | 0.298 | 0.871 | |
Clinical effectiveness, n (%).
| Group | N | Markedly effective | Effective | Ineffective | Effective rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Routine group | 45 | 24 (53.33) | 10 (22.22) | 11 (24.44) | 34 (75.55) |
| Continuous group | 45 | 31 (68.69) | 12 (26.67) | 2 (4.44) | 42 (95.55)* |
| χ2/ | 1.934 | 0.405 | 10.15 | 4.094 | |
| P | 0.164 | 0.245 | 0.002 | 0.043 |
*Compared with routine group, P<0.05.
N, number.
Comparison of times to symptom relief ().
| Group | N | Hypothermia duration (days) | Time to cough relief (days) | Time to lung rale remission (days) | Time to relief, shortness of breath (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Routine group | 45 | 2.85 ± 0.95 | 5.95 ± 1.85 | 5.68 ± 1.25 | 3.45 ± 0.75 |
| Continuous group | 45 | 1.75 ± 0.65* | 4.24 ± 1.12* | 4.15 ± 0.89* | 2.65 ± 0.65* |
|
| 6.410 | 5.304 | 6.689 | 5.407 | |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
*Compared with routine group, P<0.05.
N, number.
Comparison of quality of life between groups ().
| Group | N | Before nursing care | After nursing care |
| P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Routine group | 45 | 116.56 ± 12.04 | 110.13 ± 10.32# | 2.72 | 0.008 |
| Continuous group | 45 | 117.09 ± 12.11 | 65.89 ± 6.23*# | 25.22 | <0.001 |
|
| 0.208 | 24.62 | |||
| P | 0.835 | <0.001 |
*Compared with routine group, # Compared with pre-nursing; P<0.05.
N, number.
Comparison of satisfaction with nursing care, n (%).
| Group | N | Satisfied | Basically satisfied | Dissatisfied | Degree of satisfaction# |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Routine group | 45 | 15 (33.33) | 18 (40.00) | 12 (26.67) | 33 (73.33) |
| Continuous group | 45 | 22 (48.89) | 19 (42.22) | 4 (8.89) | 41 (91.11)* |
| χ2 | 3.993 | ||||
| P | 0.046 |
*Compared with routine group, P<0.05.
# The degree of satisfaction was determined using the equation satisfaction + basic satisfaction/number of patients × 100%.
N, number.
Comparison of complications between groups, n (%).
| Group | N | Emphysema | Respiratory failure | Pneumothorax | Heart failure | Hypoxic encephalopathy | Toxic shock | Total incidence rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Routine group | 45 | 3(6.67) | 3 (6.67) | 1 (2.22) | 2 (4.00) | 2 (4.00) | 1 (2.22) | 12 (26.67) |
| Continuous group | 45 | 1 (2.22) | 1 (2.22) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.22) | 1 (2.22) | 0 (0.00) | 4 (8.89)* |
| χ2 | 8.890 | |||||||
| P | 0.003 |
*Compared with routine group, P < 0.05.
N, number.