Literature DB >> 33768965

Prophylactic placement of inferior vena cava filters and the risk of death or venous thromboembolism in severe trauma patients: a retrospective study comparing two hospitals with different approaches.

Thien Trung Tran1,2, Haraldur Bjarnason3, Jennifer McDonald3, Nils Oddvar Skaga4, Damon E Houghton5, Brian Kim6, Knut Stavem1,7,8, Nils Einar Kløw1,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic use of inferior vena cava filters to prevent pulmonary embolism in trauma is controversial. The practice varies between hospitals and countries, in part due to conflicting evidence and guidelines.
PURPOSE: To compare the effects of pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis and mortality in two hospitals using prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement or prophylactic anticoagulation alone.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients presenting with severe trauma were recruited from two level-1 trauma centres between January 2008 and December 2013. Recruited patients from an US hospital having prophylactic inferior vena cava filter inserted were compared to a Scandinavian hospital using prophylactic anticoagulation alone. Inclusion criteria were age >15 years, Injury Severity Score >15 and survival >24 h after hospital admission. Patients with venous thromboembolism diagnosed prior to inferior vena cava filter placement were excluded. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used with adjustment for immortal time bias and predictor variables.
RESULTS: In total, 951 patients were reviewed, 282 from an US hospital having inferior vena cava filters placed and 669 from a Scandinavian hospital without inferior vena cava filters. The mean age was 45.9 vs. 47.4 years and the mean Injury Severity Score was 29.8 vs. 25.9, respectively. Inferior vena cava filter placement was not associated with the hazard of pulmonary embolism (Hazard ratio=0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12, 1.45; P=0.17) or mortality (Hazard ratio=1.16; 95% CI 0.70, 1.95; P=0.56). However, an increased rate of deep venous thrombosis was observed with inferior vena cava filters in place (Hazard ratio=3.75; 95% CI 1.68, 8.36; P=0.001).
CONCLUSION: In severely injured trauma patients, prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement was not associated with pulmonary embolism or mortality. However, inferior vena cava filters were associated with increased rate of deep venous thrombosis. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trauma; comparative studies; embolism/thrombosis; filter insertions; outcomes analysis; vena cava

Year:  2021        PMID: 33768965      PMCID: PMC7952846          DOI: 10.1177/2058460121999345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol Open


  37 in total

Review 1.  Practice management guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: the EAST practice management guidelines work group.

Authors:  Frederick B Rogers; Mark D Cipolle; George Velmahos; Grace Rozycki; Fred A Luchette
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-07

2.  Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes.

Authors:  Linda E Lévesque; James A Hanley; Abbas Kezouh; Samy Suissa
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-12

Review 3.  Risk factors for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  From imaging to reimbursement: what the pediatric radiologist needs to know about health care payers, documentation, coding and billing.

Authors:  Chul Y Chung; Mark D Alson; Richard Duszak; Andrew J Degnan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-19

Review 5.  Inferior vena cava filters for prevention of venous thromboembolism in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon P Rowland; Brahman Dharmarajah; Hayley M Moore; Tristan R A Lane; Jonathan Cousins; Ahmed R Ahmed; Alun H Davies
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Effect of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone on risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Patrick Mismetti; Silvy Laporte; Olivier Pellerin; Pierre-Vladimir Ennezat; Francis Couturaud; Antoine Elias; Nicolas Falvo; Nicolas Meneveau; Isabelle Quere; Pierre-Marie Roy; Olivier Sanchez; Jeannot Schmidt; Christophe Seinturier; Marie-Antoinette Sevestre; Jean-Paul Beregi; Bernard Tardy; Philippe Lacroix; Emilie Presles; Alain Leizorovicz; Hervé Decousus; Fabrice-Guy Barral; Guy Meyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement may increase the relative risk of deep venous thrombosis after acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Peter H Gorman; Syed F A Qadri; Anuradha Rao-Patel
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-03

Review 8.  The effectiveness of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elliott R Haut; Luis J Garcia; Hasan M Shihab; Daniel J Brotman; Kent A Stevens; Ritu Sharma; Yohalakshmi Chelladurai; Tokunbo O Akande; Kenneth M Shermock; Sosena Kebede; Jodi B Segal; Sonal Singh
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Association Between Inferior Vena Cava Filter Insertion in Trauma Patients and In-Hospital and Overall Mortality.

Authors:  Shayna Sarosiek; Denis Rybin; Janice Weinberg; Peter A Burke; George Kasotakis; J Mark Sloan
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with temporary lower limb immobilization after injury: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Horner; John W Stevens; Abdullah Pandor; Tim Nokes; Jonathan Keenan; Kerstin de Wit; Steve Goodacre
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 5.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.