Literature DB >> 3376873

Lead exposure in a ship overhaul facility during paint removal.

L E Booher1.   

Abstract

Lead exposures from paint sanding and chipping during ship overhaul were evaluated. Several hundred workers were included in the study. Lead concentrations in 275 bulk paint samples ranged from 0.03% to 17.0% with a 0.25% geometric mean. The geometric mean air lead concentration was 61.0 micrograms/m3 when these paints were sanded and 2.4 micrograms/m3 when they were chipped. Air lead concentrations exceeded the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) when paints containing as little as 0.2% lead were sanded but did not exceed the PEL or the action level when paints containing up to 6.0% lead were chipped. Poor correlation was found between paint lead contents and air lead concentrations for sanding (r = -0.27) and for chipping (r = 0.44). Similarly, poor correlation was found between air lead concentrations and blood lead levels for sanding (r = -0.14) and chipping (r = 0.24). Despite higher air lead concentrations, sanders' blood lead levels were not elevated compared with chippers and were only slightly elevated compared with non-lead workers. An extensive blood monitoring program was found to be particularly effective in assessing lead exposures and uptake while air lead monitoring was of limited value because of the high variability in air lead concentrations and in the nature of the sanding and chipping work during the overhaul. Lead-worker training was felt to be a particularly effective control measure. Blood samples collected toward the end of the overhaul revealed that blood lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels were not rising as the overhaul progressed and neared completion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3376873     DOI: 10.1080/15298668891379495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  8 in total

1.  Lead exposure in the construction industry: results from the California Occupational Lead Registry, 1987 through 1989.

Authors:  K Waller; A M Osorio; N Maizlish; S Royce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Blood lead and erythrocyte protoporphyrin levels in association with smoking and personal hygienic behaviour among lead exposed workers.

Authors:  K Karita; M Nakao; K Ohwaki; Y Yamanouchi; M Nishikitani; K Nomura; M Sato; E Yano
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  An inverse lead air to lead blood relation: the impact of air-stream helmets.

Authors:  P Ulenbelt; M E Lumens; H M Géron; R F Herber
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Work hygienic behaviour as modifier of the lead air-lead blood relation.

Authors:  P Ulenbelt; M E Lumens; H M Géron; R F Herber; S Broersen; R L Zielhuis
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  An evaluation of the significance of mouth and hand contamination for lead absorption in lead-acid battery workers.

Authors:  H S Far; N T Pin; C Y Kong; K S Fong; C W Kian; C K Yan
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Mortality among shipyard Coast Guard workers: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  S Krstev; P Stewart; J Rusiecki; A Blair
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Cross-classified occupational exposure data.

Authors:  Rachael M Jones; Igor Burstyn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Time to ban lead in industrial paints and coatings.

Authors:  Perry Gottesfeld
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-05-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.