Literature DB >> 33768695

Long term clinical performance of 10 871 dental implants with up to 22 years of follow-up: A cohort study in 4247 patients.

David French1,2, Ronen Ofec3,4, Liran Levin5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present retrospective study was aimed to assess the long-term clinical performance of dental implants in a cohort study of 4247 patients.
METHODS: A longitudinal observational cohort study was done on all implants performed by a single periodontist from July 1995 to April 2019. The main outcome variables of this study were implant failure and marginal bone level around implants.
RESULTS: The study participants received a total of 10 871 implants with a mean of 2.56 implants per patient. The cohort was followed-up to 22.2 years (mean = 4.5 ± 4.2). Among the 4247 patients of the current study, 140 patients (3.3%) experienced a combined total of 178 implant failures. According to life table analysis, at the implant level the cumulative survival rate at 3, 5, 10, and 15 years was 98.9%, 98.5%, 96.8%, and 94.0%, respectively while at patient level was 97.4%, 96.7%, 92.5%, and 86% at 3, 5, 10, and 15 years. Patients with multiple units were at a greater risk for having an implant failure. Baseline bone level was 0.09 ± 0.28 mm while at 8-10 years the mean bone level was 0.49 ± 0.74 mm. The incidence of peri-implant mucositis at the implant level was 9.4% at 2-3 years, 9.3% at 4-5 years, 12.1% at 6-7 years, and 11.9% at 8-10 years. The incidence of peri-implantitis was 2%, 2.6%, 3.2%, and 7.1% at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, and 8-10 years, respectively. Cigarette smoking and diabetes mellitus were positively correlated with implant failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Though the results are promising and encouraging in terms of survival and bone level over time, it is important to emphasize the potential risk factors and consider them prior to dental implant placement.
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  augmentation; bone loss; mucositis; peri-implantitis; success; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33768695     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  6 in total

1.  Accuracy evaluation of cone beam computed tomography applied to measure peri-implant bone thickness in living patients: an ex vivo and in vivo experiment.

Authors:  Yanhua Lan; Xiaoyuan Huang; Mingxing Fan; Huazhen Yu; Zhijian Xie; Yiqun Zhou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 2.  Systematic review on diabetes mellitus and dental implants: an update.

Authors:  Juliane Wagner; Johannes H Spille; Jörg Wiltfang; Hendrik Naujokat
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-01-03

3.  Influence of Periodontitis, Implant, and Prosthesis Characteristics on the Peri-Implant Status: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ioanna Papalou; Panagiota Vagia; Ahmet Cakir; Henri Tenenbaum; Olivier Huck; Jean-Luc Davideau
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-02-07

Review 4.  Implications of considering peri-implant bone loss a disease, a narrative review.

Authors:  Tomas Albrektsson; Pentti Tengvall; Luis Amengual-Peñafiel; Pierluigi Coli; Georgios Kotsakis; David L Cochran
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.259

5.  The effect of the use of proton pump inhibitors, serotonin uptake inhibitors, antihypertensive, and anti-inflammatory drugs on clinical outcomes of functional dental implants: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Stefano Corbella; Paolo Morandi; Alice Alberti; Benedetta Morandi; Luca Francetti
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.021

Review 6.  Nrf2 in the Field of Dentistry with Special Attention to NLRP3.

Authors:  Lisa Schieffer; Claudia Manzl; Christoph Schatz; Johannes Haybaeck; Adriano Crismani
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.