Darria L Gillespie1, Lauren A Meyers2, Michael Lachmann3, Stephen C Redd4, Jonathan M Zenilman5. 1. Clinical Assistant Professor, (darria.gillespie@erlanger.org), Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Tennessee at Erlanger Hospital, 975 East 3rd Street, Box 251, Chattanooga, TN, 37403., USA. 2. Professor, (laurenmeyers@austin.utexas.edu), Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C0990, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM, 87501., USA. 3. Professor, (lachmann@santafe.edu), Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM, 87501., USA. 4. Doctor, (sredd075@gmail.com), 2853 Habersham Road, Atlanta, GA, 30305., USA. 5. Professor, (jzenilma@jhmi.edu), Infectious Diseases Division-JHBMC, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21224., USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2020, US schools closed due to SARS-CoV-2 but their role in transmission was unknown. In fall 2020, national guidance for reopening omitted testing or screening recommendations. We report the experience of 2 large independent K-12 schools (School-A and School-B) that implemented an array of SARS-CoV-2 mitigation strategies that included periodic universal testing. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 was identified through periodic universal PCR testing, self-reporting of tests conducted outside school, and contact tracing. Schools implemented behavioral and structural mitigation measures, including mandatory masks, classroom disinfecting, and social distancing. RESULTS: Over the fall semester, School-A identified 112 cases in 2320 students and staff; School-B identified 25 cases (2.0%) in 1400 students and staff. Most cases were asymptomatic and none required hospitalization. Of 69 traceable introductions, 63 (91%) were not associated with school-based transmission, 59 cases (54%) occurred in the 2 weeks post-thanksgiving. In 6/7 clusters, clear noncompliance with mitigation protocols was found. The largest outbreak had 28 identified cases and was traced to an off-campus party. There was no transmission from students to staff. CONCLUSIONS: Although school-age children can contract and transmit SARS-CoV-2, rates of COVID-19 infection related to in-person education were significantly lower than those in the surrounding community. However, social activities among students outside of school undermined those measures and should be discouraged, perhaps with behavioral contracts, to ensure the safety of school communities. In addition, introduction risks were highest following extended school breaks. These risks may be mitigated with voluntary quarantines and surveillance testing prior to reopening.
BACKGROUND: In 2020, US schools closed due to SARS-CoV-2 but their role in transmission was unknown. In fall 2020, national guidance for reopening omitted testing or screening recommendations. We report the experience of 2 large independent K-12 schools (School-A and School-B) that implemented an array of SARS-CoV-2 mitigation strategies that included periodic universal testing. METHODS:SARS-CoV-2 was identified through periodic universal PCR testing, self-reporting of tests conducted outside school, and contact tracing. Schools implemented behavioral and structural mitigation measures, including mandatory masks, classroom disinfecting, and social distancing. RESULTS: Over the fall semester, School-A identified 112 cases in 2320 students and staff; School-B identified 25 cases (2.0%) in 1400 students and staff. Most cases were asymptomatic and none required hospitalization. Of 69 traceable introductions, 63 (91%) were not associated with school-based transmission, 59 cases (54%) occurred in the 2 weeks post-thanksgiving. In 6/7 clusters, clear noncompliance with mitigation protocols was found. The largest outbreak had 28 identified cases and was traced to an off-campus party. There was no transmission from students to staff. CONCLUSIONS: Although school-age children can contract and transmit SARS-CoV-2, rates of COVID-19infection related to in-person education were significantly lower than those in the surrounding community. However, social activities among students outside of school undermined those measures and should be discouraged, perhaps with behavioral contracts, to ensure the safety of school communities. In addition, introduction risks were highest following extended school breaks. These risks may be mitigated with voluntary quarantines and surveillance testing prior to reopening.
Authors: Saverio Caini; Chiara Martinoli; Carlo La Vecchia; Sara Raimondi; Federica Bellerba; Oriana D'Ecclesiis; Clementina Sasso; Alessandra Basso; Giulio Cammarata; Sara Gandini Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Gabriella O'Leary; Alina S Schnake-Mahl; Vaishnavi Vaidya; Usama Bilal; Jennifer Kolker Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sarah L Silverberg; Bei Yuan Zhang; Shu Nan Jessica Li; Conrad Burgert; Hennady P Shulha; Vanessa Kitchin; Laura Sauvé; Manish Sadarangani Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2022-04-02 Impact factor: 2.125