Literature DB >> 33768105

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Central Lymph Node Metastasis in T1-T2, Non-invasive, and Clinically Node Negative Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Jiang Zhu1, Jinxin Zheng2, Longfei Li3, Rui Huang4, Haoyu Ren1,5, Denghui Wang1, Zhijun Dai2, Xinliang Su1.   

Abstract

Purpose: While there are no clear indications of whether central lymph node dissection is necessary in patients with T1-T2, non-invasive, clinically uninvolved central neck lymph nodes papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), this study seeks to develop and validate models for predicting the risk of central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in these patients based on machine learning algorithms.
Methods: This is a retrospective study comprising 1,271 patients with T1-T2 stage, non-invasive, and clinically node negative (cN0) PTC who underwent surgery at the Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from February 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. We applied six machine learning (ML) algorithms, including Logistic Regression (LR), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), and Neural Network (NNET), coupled with preoperative clinical characteristics and intraoperative information to develop prediction models for CLNM. Among all the samples, 70% were randomly selected to train the models while the remaining 30% were used for validation. Indices like the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated to test the models' performance.
Results: The results showed that ~51.3% (652 out of 1,271) of the patients had pN1 disease. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, gender, tumor size and location, multifocality, age, and Delphian lymph node status were all independent predictors of CLNM. In predicting CLNM, six ML algorithms posted AUROC of 0.70-0.75, with the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model standing out, registering 0.75. Thus, we employed the best-performing ML algorithm model and uploaded the results to a self-made online risk calculator to estimate an individual's probability of CLNM (https://jin63.shinyapps.io/ML_CLNM/). Conclusions: With the incorporation of preoperative and intraoperative risk factors, ML algorithms can achieve acceptable prediction of CLNM with Xgboost model performing the best. Our online risk calculator based on ML algorithm may help determine the optimal extent of initial surgical treatment for patients with T1-T2 stage, non-invasive, and clinically node negative PTC.
Copyright © 2021 Zhu, Zheng, Li, Huang, Ren, Wang, Dai and Su.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central lymph node metastasis; lymph node dissections; machine learning algorithms; papillary thyroid carcinoma; prediction model

Year:  2021        PMID: 33768105      PMCID: PMC7986413          DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.635771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)        ISSN: 2296-858X


  14 in total

1.  Development and validation of a novel 14-gene signature for predicting lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuwei Ling; Luyao Jia; Kaifu Li; Lina Zhang; Yajun Wang; Hua Kang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-09

2.  Therapeutic Strategy in Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma - Long-Term Results of the First Single-Center Prospective Non-Randomized Trial Between 2011 and 2015.

Authors:  Agnieszka Czarniecka; Marcin Zeman; Grzegorz Wozniak; Adam Maciejewski; Ewa Stobiecka; Ewa Chmielik; Malgorzata Oczko-Wojciechowska; Jolanta Krajewska; Daria Handkiewicz-Junak; Barbara Jarzab
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Model to Predict Central Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Jingjing Li; Xinxin Wu; Ning Mao; Guibin Zheng; Haicheng Zhang; Yakui Mou; Chuanliang Jia; Jia Mi; Xicheng Song
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Bone Metastasis in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Cai Liu; Ming-Xuan Li; Wen-Xing Qian; Zhi-Wen Luo; Wei-Jie Liao; Zhi-Li Liu; Jia-Ming Liu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Male Gender Is Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis but Not with Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jiang Zhu; Rui Huang; Ping Yu; Haoyu Ren; Xinliang Su
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.257

6.  Comparison of Different Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Postirradiation Recurrence in Prostate Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Mladen Marinkovic; Marina Popovic; Suzana Stojanovic-Rundic; Milos Nikolic; Milena Cavic; Dusica Gavrilovic; Dusan Teodorovic; Nenad Mitrovic; Ljiljana Mijatovic Teodorovic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Risk Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Occurrence Within 6 Months After Coronary Revascularization: Machine Learning Study.

Authors:  Jinwan Wang; Shuai Wang; Mark Xuefang Zhu; Tao Yang; Qingfeng Yin; Ya Hou
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-04-20

8.  Discovering Common miRNA Signatures Underlying Female-Specific Cancers via a Machine Learning Approach Driven by the Cancer Hallmark ERBB.

Authors:  Katia Pane; Mario Zanfardino; Anna Maria Grimaldi; Gustavo Baldassarre; Marco Salvatore; Mariarosaria Incoronato; Monica Franzese
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-02

9.  A Comparative Analysis of Six Machine Learning Models Based on Ultrasound to Distinguish the Possibility of Central Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ying Zou; Yan Shi; Jihua Liu; Guanghe Cui; Zhi Yang; Meiling Liu; Fang Sun
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  HuaKai Tian; ZhiKun Ning; Zhen Zong; Jiang Liu; CeGui Hu; HouQun Ying; Hui Li
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.