Literature DB >> 33767329

A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement.

Bernard Liew1, Ho Yin Lee2, David Rügamer3, Alessandro Marco De Nunzio4, Nicola R Heneghan2, Deborah Falla2, David W Evans5,6.   

Abstract

The inter-session Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is a commonly investigated and clinically important metric of reliability for pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurement. However, current investigations do not account for inter-repetition variability when calculating inter-session ICC, even though a PPT measurement taken at different sessions must also imply different repetitions. The primary aim was to evaluate and report a novel metric of reliability in PPT measurement: the inter-session-repetition ICC. One rater recorded ten repetitions of PPT measurement over the lumbar region bilaterally at two sessions in twenty healthy adults using a pressure algometer. Variance components were computed using linear mixed-models and used to construct ICCs; most notably inter-session ICC and inter-session-repetition ICC. At 70.1% of the total variance, the source of greatest variability was between subjects ([Formula: see text] = 222.28 N2), whereas the source of least variability (1.5% total variance) was between sessions ([Formula: see text] = 4.83 N2). Derived inter-session and inter-session-repetition ICCs were 0.88 (95%CI: 0.77 to 0.94) and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.53 to 0.84) respectively. Inter-session-repetition ICC provides a more conservative estimate of reliability than inter-session ICC, with the magnitude of difference being clinically meaningful. Quantifying individual sources of variability enables ICC construction to be reflective of individual testing protocols.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33767329     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86344-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  25 in total

1.  Applying concepts of generalizability theory on data from experimental pain studies to investigate reliability.

Authors:  Assam Pryseley; Edouard Y Ledent; Asbjørn M Drewes; Camilla Staahl; Anne E Olesen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 4.080

2.  Improving QST Reliability--More Raters, Tests, or Occasions? A Multivariate Generalizability Study.

Authors:  Søren O'Neill; Lotte O'Neill
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Reliability of pressure pain threshold testing in healthy pain free young adults.

Authors:  Robert Waller; Leon Straker; Peter O'Sullivan; Michele Sterling; Anne Smith
Journal:  Scand J Pain       Date:  2015-10-01

4.  Assessing Endogenous Pain Inhibition: Test-Retest Reliability of Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia in Local and Remote Body Parts After Aerobic Cycling.

Authors:  Stefan Gomolka; Henrik Bjarke Vaegter; Jo Nijs; Mira Meeus; Hannah Gajsar; Monika I Hasenbring; Christina Titze
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Pressure Pain Threshold in Subjects With Piriformis Syndrome: Test-Retest, Intrarater, and Interrater Reliability, and Minimal Detectible Changes.

Authors:  Abbas Tabatabaiee; Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani; Javad Sarrafzadeh; Reza Salehi; Maryam Ahmadi
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Intra-session absolute and relative reliability of pressure pain thresholds in the low back region of vine-workers: ffect of the number of trials.

Authors:  Romain Balaguier; Pascal Madeleine; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  How stable are quantitative sensory testing measurements over time? Report on 10-week reliability and agreement of results in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Helen Nothnagel; Christian Puta; Thomas Lehmann; Philipp Baumbach; Martha B Menard; Brunhild Gabriel; Holger H W Gabriel; Thomas Weiss; Frauke Musial
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Intraclass correlation - A discussion and demonstration of basic features.

Authors:  David Liljequist; Britt Elfving; Kirsti Skavberg Roaldsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Is One Trial Sufficient to Obtain Excellent Pressure Pain Threshold Reliability in the Low Back of Asymptomatic Individuals? A Test-Retest Study.

Authors:  Romain Balaguier; Pascal Madeleine; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients-The reliability of a pressure algometer.

Authors:  Mari Kalland Knapstad; Stein Helge Glad Nordahl; Ingvill Fjell Naterstad; Tove Ask; Jan Sture Skouen; Frederik Kragerud Goplen
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2018-08-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  A Statistical Model to Determine Biomechanical Limits for Physically Safe Interactions With Collaborative Robots.

Authors:  R Behrens; G Pliske; M Umbreit; S Piatek; F Walcher; N Elkmann
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-02-03

2.  Pressure pain thresholds in a real-world chiropractic setting: topography, changes after treatment, and clinical relevance?

Authors:  Casper G Nim; Sasha L Aspinall; Rasmus Weibel; Martin G Steenfelt; Søren O'Neill
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2022-05-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.