Literature DB >> 33767301

Analysis of the response of the cell membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during the detoxification of common lignocellulosic inhibitors.

Pau Cabaneros López1, Chuantao Peng2, Nils Arneborg2, Helena Junicke1, Krist V Gernaey3.   

Abstract

Gaining an in-depth understanding of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the different inhibitors generated during the pretreatment of lignocellulosic material is driving the development of new strains with higher inhibitor tolerances. The objective of this study is to assess, using flow cytometry, how three common inhibitors (vanillin, furfural, and acetic acid) affect the membrane potential, the membrane permeability and the concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during the different fermentations. The membrane potential decreased during the detoxification phase and reflected on the different mechanisms of the toxicity of the inhibitors. While vanillin and furfural caused a metabolic inhibition and a gradual depolarization, acetic acid toxicity was related to fast acidification of the cytosol, causing an immediate depolarization. In the absence of acetic acid, ethanol increased membrane permeability, indicating a possible acquired tolerance to ethanol due to an adaptive response to acetic acid. The intracellular ROS concentration also increased in the presence of the inhibitors, indicating oxidative stress. Measuring these features with flow cytometry allows a real-time assessment of the stress of a cell culture, which can be used in the development of new yeast strains and to design new propagation strategies to pre-adapt the cell cultures to the inhibitors.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33767301     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86135-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  34 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates.

Authors:  Z Lewis Liu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Examining the role of membrane lipid composition in determining the ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Clark M Henderson; David E Block
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effect of ethanol on fluxes of water and protons across the plasma membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ana Madeira; Luís Leitão; Graça Soveral; Patrícia Dias; Catarina Prista; Teresa Moura; Maria C Loureiro-Dias
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Relationship between lipid composition, frequency of ethanol-induced respiratory deficient mutants, and ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Z Chi; N Arneborg
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 5.  Development of yeast cell factories for consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose to bioethanol through cell surface engineering.

Authors:  Tomohisa Hasunuma; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 14.227

6.  Relationship between ethanol tolerance, H+ -ATPase activity and the lipid composition of the plasma membrane in different wine yeast strains.

Authors:  F Aguilera; R A Peinado; C Millán; J M Ortega; J C Mauricio
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  The effect of ethanol and specific growth rate on the lipid content and composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown anaerobically in a chemostat.

Authors:  N Arneborg; C E Høy; O B Jørgensen
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.239

8.  Involvement of ergosterol in tolerance to vanillin, a potential inhibitor of bioethanol fermentation, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ayako Endo; Toshihide Nakamura; Jun Shima
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  Relationship between ethanol tolerance, lipid composition and plasma membrane fluidity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculata.

Authors:  H Alexandre; I Rousseaux; C Charpentier
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  Sphingolipids contribute to acetic acid resistance in Zygosaccharomyces bailii.

Authors:  Lina Lindahl; Samuel Genheden; Leif A Eriksson; Lisbeth Olsson; Maurizio Bettiga
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  4 in total

1.  Improving Lipid Production of Yarrowia lipolytica by the Aldehyde Dehydrogenase-Mediated Furfural Detoxification.

Authors:  Jiwon Kim; Hyeoncheol Francis Son; Sungmin Hwang; Gyeongtaek Gong; Ja Kyong Ko; Youngsoon Um; Sung Ok Han; Sun-Mi Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  Response mechanisms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the stress factors present in lignocellulose hydrolysate and strategies for constructing robust strains.

Authors:  Bo Li; Nan Liu; Xuebing Zhao
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod       Date:  2022-03-15

3.  Screening and transcriptomic analysis of the ethanol-tolerant mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae YN81 for high-gravity brewing.

Authors:  Tianyou Yang; Shishuang Zhang; Linbo Li; Jing Tian; Xu Li; Yuru Pan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  D-Lactic Acid Production from Sugarcane Bagasse by Genetically Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Warasirin Sornlek; Kittapong Sae-Tang; Akaraphol Watcharawipas; Sriwan Wongwisansri; Sutipa Tanapongpipat; Lily Eurwilaichtr; Verawat Champreda; Weerawat Runguphan; Peter J Schaap; Vitor A P Martins Dos Santos
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.