Literature DB >> 33767231

Polypill eligibility and equivalent intake in a Swiss population-based study.

Julien Castioni1, Nazanin Abolhassani2, Peter Vollenweider1, Gérard Waeber1, Pedro Marques-Vidal1.   

Abstract

The polypill has been advocated for cardiovascular disease (CVD) management. The fraction of the population who could benefit from the polypill in Switzerland is unknown. Assess (1) the prevalence of subjects (a) eligible for the polypill and (b) already taking a polypill equivalent; and (2) the determinants of polypill intake in the first (2009-2012) and second follow-ups (2014-2017) of a population-based prospective study conducted in Lausanne, Switzerland. The first and the second follow-ups included 5038 and 4596 participants aged 40-80 years, respectively. Polypill eligibility was defined as having a high CVD risk as assessed by an absolute CVD risk ≥ 5% with the SCORE equation for Switzerland and/or presenting with CVD. Four polypill equivalents were defined: statin + any antihypertensive with (A) or without (B) aspirin; statin + calcium channel blocker (CCB) (C); and statin + CCB + angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (D). The prevalence of polypill eligibility was 20.6% (95% CI 19.5-21.8) and 27.7% (26.5-29.1) in the first and second follow-up, respectively. However, only around one-third of the eligible 29.5% (95% CI 26.7-32.3) and 30.4% (27.9-33.0) respectively, already took the polypill equivalents. All polypill equivalents were more prevalent among men, elderly and in presence of CVD. After multivariable adjustment, in both periods, male gender was associated with taking polypill equivalent A (OR: 1.93; 95% CI 1.45-2.55 and OR: 1.67; 95% CI 1.27-2.19, respectively) and polypill equivalent B (OR: 1.52; 95% CI 1.17-1.96 and OR: 1.41; 95% CI 1.07-1.85, respectively). Similarly, in both periods, age over 70 years, compared to middle-age, was associated with taking polypill equivalent A (OR: 11.71; CI 6.74-20.33 and OR: 9.56; CI 4.13-22.13, respectively) and equivalent B (OR: 13.22; CI 7.27-24.07 and OR: 20.63; CI 6.51-56.36, respectively). Former or current smoking was also associated with a higher likelihood of taking polypill equivalent A in both periods. A large fraction of the population is eligible for the polypill, but only one-third of them actually benefits from an equivalent, and this proportion did not change over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33767231      PMCID: PMC7994372          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84455-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  30 in total

Review 1.  The polypill in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases: key concepts, current status, challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Eva Lonn; Jackie Bosch; Koon K Teo; Prem Pais; Denis Xavier; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Availability and utilization of cardiovascular fixed-dose combination drugs in the United States.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Niteesh K Choudhry; Joshua J Gagne; Joan Landon; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  Polypills for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Clara K Chow; Qingtao Meng
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Comparison of Five Major Guidelines for Statin Use in Primary Prevention in a Contemporary General Population.

Authors:  Martin Bødtker Mortensen; Børge Grønne Nordestgaard
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Gender difference in the association between Framingham Risk Score with cardio-metabolic risk factors and psychological distress in patients with metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi; Leila Jahangiry
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr       Date:  2020-01-03

6.  American, British and European recommendations for statins in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease applied to British men studied prospectively.

Authors:  P McElduff; M Jaefarnezhad; P N Durrington
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Five year trends in dyslipidaemia prevalence and management in Switzerland: the CoLaus study.

Authors:  P Antiochos; P Marques-Vidal; G Waeber; P Vollenweider
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.222

8.  Randomized Polypill crossover trial in people aged 50 and over.

Authors:  David S Wald; Joan K Morris; Nicholas J Wald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK.

Authors:  Virginia Becerra; Alfredo Gracia; Kamal Desai; Seye Abogunrin; Sarah Brand; Ruth Chapman; Fernando García Alonso; Valentín Fuster; Ginés Sanz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Patterns of benzodiazepine prescription among older adults in Switzerland: a cross-sectional analysis of claims data.

Authors:  Xhyljeta Luta; Christophe Bagnoud; Mark Lambiris; Anne Decollogny; Yves Eggli; Marie-Annick Le Pogam; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Joachim Marti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.