Literature DB >> 33767141

Qualitative similarities and differences in visual object representations between brains and deep networks.

Georgin Jacob1,2, R T Pramod1,2, Harish Katti1, S P Arun3.   

Abstract

Deep neural networks have revolutionized computer vision, and their object representations across layers match coarsely with visual cortical areas in the brain. However, whether these representations exhibit qualitative patterns seen in human perception or brain representations remains unresolved. Here, we recast well-known perceptual and neural phenomena in terms of distance comparisons, and ask whether they are present in feedforward deep neural networks trained for object recognition. Some phenomena were present in randomly initialized networks, such as the global advantage effect, sparseness, and relative size. Many others were present after object recognition training, such as the Thatcher effect, mirror confusion, Weber's law, relative size, multiple object normalization and correlated sparseness. Yet other phenomena were absent in trained networks, such as 3D shape processing, surface invariance, occlusion, natural parts and the global advantage. These findings indicate sufficient conditions for the emergence of these phenomena in brains and deep networks, and offer clues to the properties that could be incorporated to improve deep networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33767141     DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22078-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  31 in total

1.  Comparing machines and humans on a visual categorization test.

Authors:  François Fleuret; Ting Li; Charles Dubout; Emma K Wampler; Steven Yantis; Donald Geman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Deep Learning: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

Authors:  Thomas Serre
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 6.422

3.  How do targets, nontargets, and scene context influence real-world object detection?

Authors:  Harish Katti; Marius V Peelen; S P Arun
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Engineering a Less Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Fabian H Sinz; Xaq Pitkow; Jacob Reimer; Matthias Bethge; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Inversion and configuration of faces.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; J Searcy
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion.

Authors:  P Thompson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Large-Scale, High-Resolution Comparison of the Core Visual Object Recognition Behavior of Humans, Monkeys, and State-of-the-Art Deep Artificial Neural Networks.

Authors:  Rishi Rajalingham; Elias B Issa; Pouya Bashivan; Kohitij Kar; Kailyn Schmidt; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Evidence that recurrent circuits are critical to the ventral stream's execution of core object recognition behavior.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar; Jonas Kubilius; Kailyn Schmidt; Elias B Issa; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 28.771

9.  Are you from North or South India? A hard face-classification task reveals systematic representational differences between humans and machines.

Authors:  Harish Katti; S P Arun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Resolving human object recognition in space and time.

Authors:  Radoslaw Martin Cichy; Dimitrios Pantazis; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  4 in total

1.  On the synthesis of visual illusions using deep generative models.

Authors:  Alex Gomez-Villa; Adrián Martín; Javier Vazquez-Corral; Marcelo Bertalmío; Jesús Malo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

2.  Joint encoding of facial identity, orientation, gaze, and expression in the middle dorsal face area.

Authors:  Zetian Yang; Winrich A Freiwald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A test of indirect grounding of abstract concepts using multimodal distributional semantics.

Authors:  Akira Utsumi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-10-04

4.  General object-based features account for letter perception.

Authors:  Daniel Janini; Chris Hamblin; Arturo Deza; Talia Konkle
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.779

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.