Literature DB >> 33766953

Sound detection by the American lobster (Homarus americanus).

Youenn Jézéquel1,2, Ian T Jones2,3, Julien Bonnel4, Laurent Chauvaud5, Jelle Atema6, T Aran Mooney3.   

Abstract

Although many crustaceans produce sounds, their hearing abilities and mechanisms are poorly understood, leaving uncertainties regarding whether or how these animals use sound for acoustic communication. Marine invertebrates lack gas-filled organs required for sound pressure detection, but some of them are known to be sensitive to particle motion. Here, we examined whether the American lobster (Homarus americanus) could detect sound and subsequently sought to discern the auditory mechanisms. Acoustic stimuli responses were measured using auditory evoked potential (AEP) methods. Neurophysiological responses were obtained from the brain using tone pips between 80 and 250 Hz, with best sensitivity at 80-120 Hz. There were no significant differences between the auditory thresholds of males and females. Repeated controls (recordings from deceased lobsters, moving electrodes away from the brain and reducing seawater temperature) indicated the evoked potentials' neuronal origin. In addition, AEP responses were similar before and after antennules (including statocysts) were ablated, demonstrating that the statocysts, a long-proposed auditory structure in crustaceans, are not the sensory organs responsible for lobster sound detection. However, AEPs could be eliminated (or highly reduced) after immobilizing hairfans, which cover much of lobster bodies. These results suggest that these external cuticular hairs are likely to be responsible for sound detection, and imply that hearing is mechanistically possible in a wider array of invertebrates than previously considered. Because the lobsters' hearing range encompasses the fundamental frequency of their buzzing sounds, it is likely that they use sound for intraspecific communication, broadening our understanding of the sensory ecology of this commercially vital species. The lobsters' low-frequency acoustic sensitivity also underscores clear concerns about the potential impacts of anthropogenic noise.
© 2021. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic communication; Auditory evoked potential; Crustacean; Hearing; Marine invertebrate

Year:  2021        PMID: 33766953     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.240747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  1 in total

1.  Acoustic particle motion detection in the snapping shrimp (Alpheus richardsoni).

Authors:  Jason P Dinh; Craig Radford
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.