Literature DB >> 33766924

Substituted Cysteine Modification and Protection with n-Alkyl- Methanethiosulfonate Reagents Yields a Precise Estimate of the Distance between Etomidate and a Residue in Activated GABA Type A Receptors.

Ryan J Fantasia1, Anahita Nourmahnad1, Elizabeth Halpin1, Stuart A Forman2.   

Abstract

The anesthetic etomidate modulates synaptic α1β2/3γ2 GABAA receptors via binding sites located in transmembrane β+/α- interfaces. Various approaches indicate that etomidate binds near β2/3M286 side chains, including recent cryogenic electron microscopy images in α1β2γ2L receptors under nonphysiologic conditions with ∼3.5-Å resolution. We hypothesized that substituted cysteine modification and protection experiments using variably sized n-alkyl-methanethiosulfonate (MTS) reagents could precisely estimate the distance between bound etomidate and β3M286 side chains in activated functional receptors. Using voltage-clamp electrophysiology in Xenopus oocytes expressing α1β3M286Cγ2L GABAA receptors, we measured functional changes after exposing GABA-activated receptors to n-alkyl-MTS reagents, from methyl-MTS to n-decyl-MTS. Based on previous studies using a large sulfhydryl reagent, we anticipated that cysteine modifications large enough to overlap etomidate sites would cause persistently increased GABA sensitivity and decreased etomidate modulation and that etomidate would hinder these modifications, reducing effects. Based on altered GABA or etomidate sensitivity, ethyl-MTS and larger n-alkyl-MTS reagents modified GABA-activated α1β3M286Cγ2L GABAA receptors. Receptor modification by n-propyl-MTS or larger reagents caused persistently increased GABA sensitivity and decreased etomidate modulation. Receptor-bound etomidate blocked β3M286C modification by n-propyl-MTS, n-butyl-MTS, and n-hexyl-MTS. In contrast, GABA sensitivity was unaltered by receptor exposure to methyl-MTS or ethyl-MTS, and ethyl-MTS modification uniquely increased etomidate modulation. These results reveal a "cut-on" between ethyl-MTS and n-propyl-MTS, from which we infer that -S-(n-propyl) is the smallest β3M286C appendage that overlaps with etomidate sites. Molecular models of the native methionine and -S-ethyl and -S-(n-propyl) modified cysteines suggest that etomidate is located between 1.7 and 3.0 Å from the β3M286 side chain. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Precise spatial relationships between drugs and their receptor sites are essential for mechanistic understanding and drug development. This study combined electrophysiology, a cysteine substitution, and n-alkyl-methanethiosulfonate modifiers, creating a precise molecular ruler to estimate the distance between a α1β3γ2L GABA type A receptor residue and etomidate bound in the transmembrane β+/α- interface.
Copyright © 2021 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33766924      PMCID: PMC9354027          DOI: 10.1124/molpharm.120.000224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.054


  26 in total

1.  Subunit arrangement of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors.

Authors:  S W Baumann; R Baur; E Sigel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  A Cysteine Substitution Probes β3H267 Interactions with Propofol and Other Potent Anesthetics in α1β3γ2L γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors.

Authors:  Alex T Stern; Stuart A Forman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Cryo-Electron Microscopy: Moving Beyond X-Ray Crystal Structures for Drug Receptors and Drug Development.

Authors:  Javier García-Nafría; Christopher G Tate
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 13.820

4.  Mutations in the GABAA receptor that mimic the allosteric ligand etomidate.

Authors:  Stuart A Forman; Deirdre Stewart
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

5.  Methionine 286 in transmembrane domain 3 of the GABAA receptor beta subunit controls a binding cavity for propofol and other alkylphenol general anesthetics.

Authors:  M D Krasowski; K Nishikawa; N Nikolaeva; A Lin; N L Harrison
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Monod-Wyman-Changeux Allosteric Shift Analysis in Mutant α1β3γ2L GABAA Receptors Indicates Selectivity and Crosstalk among Intersubunit Transmembrane Anesthetic Sites.

Authors:  Andrea Szabo; Anahita Nourmahnad; Elizabeth Halpin; Stuart A Forman
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Propofol and other intravenous anesthetics have sites of action on the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor distinct from that for isoflurane.

Authors:  M D Krasowski; V V Koltchine; C E Rick; Q Ye; S E Finn; N L Harrison
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Specificity of intersubunit general anesthetic-binding sites in the transmembrane domain of the human α1β3γ2 γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor.

Authors:  David C Chiara; Selwyn S Jayakar; Xiaojuan Zhou; Xi Zhang; Pavel Y Savechenkov; Karol S Bruzik; Keith W Miller; Jonathan B Cohen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Inhibitors tethered near the acetylcholinesterase active site serve as molecular rulers of the peripheral and acylation sites.

Authors:  Joseph L Johnson; Bernadette Cusack; Thomas F Hughes; Elizabeth H McCullough; Abdul Fauq; Peteris Romanovskis; Arno F Spatola; Terrone L Rosenberry
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Shared structural mechanisms of general anaesthetics and benzodiazepines.

Authors:  Jeong Joo Kim; Anant Gharpure; Jinfeng Teng; Yuxuan Zhuang; Rebecca J Howard; Shaotong Zhu; Colleen M Noviello; Richard M Walsh; Erik Lindahl; Ryan E Hibbs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.