F Clarençon1,2,3, C P Stracke4, E Shotar5, M Wallocha4, P J Mosimann4, A-L Boch6, N Sourour5, R Chapot4. 1. From the Departments of Neuroradiology (F.C., E.S., N.S.) frederic.clarencon@aphp.fr. 2. Sorbonne University (F.C.), Paris, France. 3. Groupe de Recherche Clinique BIOFAST (F.C.), Paris VI University, Paris, France. 4. Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (C.P.S., M.W., P.J.M., R.C.), Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus, Essen, Germany. 5. From the Departments of Neuroradiology (F.C., E.S., N.S.). 6. Neurosurgery (A.-L.B.), Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal arteriovenous fistulas are challenging to cure by endovascular means, with a risk of incomplete occlusion or delayed recurrence. The authors report herein their preliminary experience using the pressure cooker technique for the embolization of spinal arteriovenous fistulas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients (8 men; mean age, 60.3 years) underwent an endovascular treatment of a spinal arteriovenous fistula (12 dural spinal arteriovenous fistulas and 3 epidural spinal arteriovenous fistulas) in 2 different institutions using the pressure cooker technique. Two microcatheters could be navigated in the segmental artery in all patients using 2 guiding catheters. A proximal plug was achieved with highly concentrated cyanoacrylate ± coils. The liquid embolic agent injected to cure the fistula was diluted cyanoacrylate (n = 11) or ethylene-vinyl alcohol (n = 4). Technical and clinical complications were systematically recorded. Clinical and angiographic outcomes were systematically evaluated at follow-up. RESULTS: One (6.7%) procedure-related complication was recorded, which consisted of a transient radicular deficit, related to nerve root ischemia. Clinical improvement was observed in 10/14 (71%) patients for whom clinical follow-up was available. Complete spinal arteriovenous fistula occlusion on a follow-up angiography was observed in 11/12 patients (91.7%) for whom angiographic follow-up was available. One patient (8.3%) presented with a delayed recurrence at 29 months. CONCLUSIONS: The pressure cooker technique is feasible, with either glue or ethylene-vinyl alcohol, for the embolization of spinal arteriovenous fistulas. Our results suggest the safety and effectiveness of this technique.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal arteriovenous fistulas are challenging to cure by endovascular means, with a risk of incomplete occlusion or delayed recurrence. The authors report herein their preliminary experience using the pressure cooker technique for the embolization of spinal arteriovenous fistulas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients (8 men; mean age, 60.3 years) underwent an endovascular treatment of a spinal arteriovenous fistula (12 dural spinal arteriovenous fistulas and 3 epidural spinal arteriovenous fistulas) in 2 different institutions using the pressure cooker technique. Two microcatheters could be navigated in the segmental artery in all patients using 2 guiding catheters. A proximal plug was achieved with highly concentrated cyanoacrylate ± coils. The liquid embolic agent injected to cure the fistula was diluted cyanoacrylate (n = 11) or ethylene-vinyl alcohol (n = 4). Technical and clinical complications were systematically recorded. Clinical and angiographic outcomes were systematically evaluated at follow-up. RESULTS: One (6.7%) procedure-related complication was recorded, which consisted of a transient radicular deficit, related to nerve root ischemia. Clinical improvement was observed in 10/14 (71%) patients for whom clinical follow-up was available. Complete spinal arteriovenous fistula occlusion on a follow-up angiography was observed in 11/12 patients (91.7%) for whom angiographic follow-up was available. One patient (8.3%) presented with a delayed recurrence at 29 months. CONCLUSIONS: The pressure cooker technique is feasible, with either glue or ethylene-vinyl alcohol, for the embolization of spinal arteriovenous fistulas. Our results suggest the safety and effectiveness of this technique.
Authors: D K Filippiadis; C Binkert; O Pellerin; R T Hoffmann; A Krajina; P L Pereira Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: René Chapot; Paul Stracke; Aglaé Velasco; Hannes Nordmeyer; Markus Heddier; Michael Stauder; Petra Schooss; Pascal J Mosimann Journal: J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 3.447
Authors: Maxime Bretonnier; Pierre-Louis Hénaux; Thomas Gaberel; Vincent Roualdes; Gaelle Kerdiles; Pierre-Jean Le Reste; Xavier Morandi Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Nicolaas A Bakker; Maarten Uyttenboogaart; G J Luijckx; Omid S Eshghi; Aryan Mazuri; Jan D M Metzemaekers; Rob J M Groen; J Marc C Van Dijk Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 4.654