Literature DB >> 33766118

Factors that facilitate multigenerational exchanges in regional locations: a cross-sectional study in Niigata City, Japan.

Kumiko Morita1, Minako Kobayashi2, Rieko Aoki3, Hitomi Nagamine4, Harumi Yamamoto3, Fumi Ohtake3, Mika Hoki3, Hiroko Sumita3, Kayo Maruyama3, Kayoko Mitsuhashi3, Akiko Sasaki3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the process of community building, it is important to create a place for multigenerational exchanges. To promote multigenerational exchanges in regional locations, it is essential to clarify whether such exchanges are related to government infrastructure, regional characteristics, and social capital, and how these exchanges contribute to community building.
METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted with representatives from 455 Chiiki no Cha-no-Ma (literal translation "community living room," and hereafter "Cha-no-Ma") in Niigata City, Japan. Responses were received from 405 representatives (response rate: 89.0 %), and 401 agreed to participate (4 declined). The survey details included basic information (e.g., date each location was established, frequency of meetings, number of caretakers and participants, qualifications of the representative), activities reflecting local culture, a social capital scale, the effects of the Cha-no-Ma implemented by the representative (12 items), challenges for management (16 items), and the implementation of multigenerational exchanges.
RESULTS: Most of the age groups that participated in the Cha-no-Ma were elderly, and multigenerational exchanges took place in 125 locations (31.5 %). Items that had a significant connection to the implementation of multigenerational exchanges were "Frequency of meetings" (p < 0.001) and "Activities reflecting local culture" (p = 0.026). Binomial logistic regression analysis indicated that a high frequency of meetings was associated with the implementation of multigenerational exchanges (Odds ratio = 3.839). There was a significantly higher ratio of implementation of multigenerational exchanges when the effects were a "connection with the region" (p = 0.006) and "conversations with different generations" (p = 0.004), and when the challenge was "no support from residents" (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Cha-no-Ma participation is low among young people. The following ideas can be considered in order to increase multigenerational exchanges in regional locations. These exchanges may be promoted by increasing the frequency of meetings with qualified personnel and by adding activities that reflect local culture, such as festivals and making local foods. This community-based study clearly indicates that implementing multigenerational exchanges is an important activity for community building because it is related to connection within the community.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community building; Community‐based study; Multigenerational exchanges; Social capital

Year:  2021        PMID: 33766118     DOI: 10.1186/s13690-021-00563-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Public Health        ISSN: 0778-7367


  9 in total

Review 1.  Social relationships and risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies.

Authors:  Jisca S Kuiper; Marij Zuidersma; Richard C Oude Voshaar; Sytse U Zuidema; Edwin R van den Heuvel; Ronald P Stolk; Nynke Smidt
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 10.895

2.  Intergenerational understandings of personal, social and community assets for health.

Authors:  Justen P O'Connor; Laura Alfrey; Clare Hall; Geraldine Burke
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.078

3.  Experience Corps Baltimore: Exploring the Stressors and Rewards of High-intensity Civic Engagement.

Authors:  Vijay R Varma; Michelle C Carlson; Jeanine M Parisi; Elizabeth K Tanner; Sylvia McGill; Linda P Fried; Linda H Song; Tara L Gruenewald
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2014-03-03

Review 4.  Intergenerational programs: What can school-age children and older people expect from them? A systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Giraudeau; Nathalie Bailly
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2019-01-28

5.  The effect of intergenerational programs on the mental health of elderly adults.

Authors:  Yoh Murayama; Hiromi Ohba; Masashi Yasunaga; Kumiko Nonaka; Rumi Takeuchi; Mariko Nishi; Naoko Sakuma; Hayato Uchida; Shoji Shinkai; Yoshinori Fujiwara
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.658

6.  Intergenerational interaction, social capital and health: results from a randomised controlled trial in Brazil.

Authors:  Elza Maria de Souza; Emily Grundy
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  The impact of intergenerational programs on social capital in Japan: a randomized population-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yoh Murayama; Hiroshi Murayama; Masami Hasebe; Jun Yamaguchi; Yoshinori Fujiwara
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  An intergenerational program based on psycho-motor activity promotes well-being and interaction between preschool children and older adults: results of a process and outcome evaluation study in Austria.

Authors:  Erika Mosor; Karin Waldherr; Ingvild Kjeken; Maisa Omara; Valentin Ritschl; Veronika Pinter-Theiss; Josef Smolen; Ursula Hübel; Tanja Stamm
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Interactive programs with preschool children bring smiles and conversation to older adults: time-sampling study.

Authors:  Kumiko Morita; Minako Kobayashi
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.921

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.