Carinne Brody1, Rachel L Berkowitz2, Pheak Chhoun3, Kathryn C Kaplan3, Sovannary Tuot3, Siyan Yi3,4. 1. Public Health Program, College of Education and Health Sciences, Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, 94592, USA. carinne.brody@gmail.com. 2. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. 3. KHANA Center for Population Health Research, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. 4. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intravaginal practices (IVPs), methods used by women most often to manage vaginal hygiene and address perceived disruptions to vaginal health, may increase the risk of contracting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This qualitative study explores the social, professional, and peer context surrounding IVPs, the experiences of self-cleaning or getting cleaned from a health professional, and the perceived impacts of IVPs among female entertainment workers (FEWs) in Cambodia. METHODS: In 2017, we conducted 27 focus group discussions from four provinces, and 16 follow-up semi-structured in-depth interviews with purposively selected participants in two provinces. Data collection occurred over three weeks, with concurrent data transcription and translation. The data from the transcripts were analyzed using Dedoose, an online, open-access qualitative analysis software. Two researchers independently labeled sections of transcripts associated with broader categories and subcategories based on the initial content analysis matrix and created codes. This process continued iteratively until a final coding schema and conceptual model was created. RESULTS: We found that IVPs are widely practiced among FEWs in Cambodia and are associated with internalized and enacted stigma. Stigma was an overarching theme that impacted the sub-themes of (1) messages about cleaning, (2) the cleaning process, and (3) the impact of cleaning. Experiences of enacted stigma and internalized stigma permeated conversations about IVP, including feeling pressured by peers to keep themselves clean, practicing internal cleaning after transactional sex, and being called dirty by health providers. CONCLUSIONS: FEWs who practice IVP talk about it in the context of their lived experiences stigma and discrimination. Highly stigmatized practices such as IVP among FEWs may benefit from a harm reduction approach that emphasizes positive changes without judgment, coercion, or discrimination.
BACKGROUND: Intravaginal practices (IVPs), methods used by women most often to manage vaginal hygiene and address perceived disruptions to vaginal health, may increase the risk of contracting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This qualitative study explores the social, professional, and peer context surrounding IVPs, the experiences of self-cleaning or getting cleaned from a health professional, and the perceived impacts of IVPs among female entertainment workers (FEWs) in Cambodia. METHODS: In 2017, we conducted 27 focus group discussions from four provinces, and 16 follow-up semi-structured in-depth interviews with purposively selected participants in two provinces. Data collection occurred over three weeks, with concurrent data transcription and translation. The data from the transcripts were analyzed using Dedoose, an online, open-access qualitative analysis software. Two researchers independently labeled sections of transcripts associated with broader categories and subcategories based on the initial content analysis matrix and created codes. This process continued iteratively until a final coding schema and conceptual model was created. RESULTS: We found that IVPs are widely practiced among FEWs in Cambodia and are associated with internalized and enacted stigma. Stigma was an overarching theme that impacted the sub-themes of (1) messages about cleaning, (2) the cleaning process, and (3) the impact of cleaning. Experiences of enacted stigma and internalized stigma permeated conversations about IVP, including feeling pressured by peers to keep themselves clean, practicing internal cleaning after transactional sex, and being called dirty by health providers. CONCLUSIONS: FEWs who practice IVP talk about it in the context of their lived experiences stigma and discrimination. Highly stigmatized practices such as IVP among FEWs may benefit from a harm reduction approach that emphasizes positive changes without judgment, coercion, or discrimination.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cambodia; Douching; Intravaginal practices; Sex work; Stigma
Authors: M Carter; M Gallo; C Anderson; M C Snead; J Wiener; A Bailey; E Costenbader; J Legardy-Williams; T Hylton-Kong Journal: West Indian Med J Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 0.171
Authors: Sumathi Sivapalasingam; R Scott McClelland; Jacques Ravel; Aabid Ahmed; Charles M Cleland; Pawel Gajer; Musa Mwamzaka; Fatma Marshed; Juma Shafi; Linnet Masese; Mark Fajans; Molly E Anderson; Walter Jaoko; Ann E Kurth Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Youchun Zhang; Zhang Youchun; Jane D Brown; Kathryn E Muessig; Xianxiang Feng; Feng Xianxiang; Wenzhen He; He Wenzhen Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-02