Literature DB >> 33765971

Respectful maternal and newborn care: measurement in one EN-BIRTH study hospital in Nepal.

Rejina Gurung1, Harriet Ruysen2, Joy E Lawn2, Ashish Kc3, Avinash K Sunny1, Louise T Day2, Loveday Penn-Kekana2, Mats Målqvist4, Binda Ghimire5, Dela Singh5, Omkar Basnet1, Srijana Sharma1, Theresa Shaver6, Allisyn C Moran7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respectful maternal and newborn care (RMNC) is an important component of high-quality care but progress is impeded by critical measurement gaps for women and newborns. The Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study was an observational study with mixed methods assessing measurement validity for coverage and quality of maternal and newborn indicators. This paper reports results regarding the measurement of respectful care for women and newborns.
METHODS: At one EN-BIRTH study site in Pokhara, Nepal, we included additional questions during exit-survey interviews with women about their experiences (July 2017-July 2018). The questionnaire was based on seven mistreatment typologies: Physical; Sexual; or Verbal abuse; Stigma/discrimination; Failure to meet professional standards of care; Poor rapport between women and providers; and Health care denied due to inability to pay. We calculated associations between these typologies and potential determinants of health - ethnicity, age, sex, mode of birth - as possible predictors for reporting poor care.
RESULTS: Among 4296 women interviewed, none reported physical, sexual, or verbal abuse. 15.7% of women were dissatisfied with privacy, and 13.0% of women reported their birth experience did not meet their religious and cultural needs. In descriptive analysis, adjusted odds ratios and multivariate analysis showed primiparous women were less likely to report respectful care (β = 0.23, p-value < 0.0001). Women from Madeshi (a disadvantaged ethnic group) were more likely to report poor care (β = - 0.34; p-value 0.037) than women identifying as Chettri/Brahmin. Women who had caesarean section were less likely to report poor care during childbirth (β = - 0.42; p-value < 0.0001) than women with a vaginal birth. However, babies born by caesarean had a 98% decrease in the odds (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.01-0.05) of receiving skin-to-skin contact than those with vaginal births.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of respectful care at exit interview after hospital birth is challenging, and women generally reported 100% respectful care for themselves and their baby. Specific questions, with stratification by mode of birth, women's age and ethnicity, are important to identify those mistreated during care and to prioritise action. More research is needed to develop evidence-based measures to track experience of care, including zero separation for the mother-newborn pair, and to improve monitoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coverage; Delivery; Maternal; Mistreatment; Nepal; Newborn; Privacy; Respect; Respectful maternal and newborn care; Standard of care

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33765971      PMCID: PMC7995692          DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03516-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth        ISSN: 1471-2393            Impact factor:   3.007


  44 in total

1.  Association Between Disrespect and Abuse During Childbirth and Women's Confidence in Health Facilities in Tanzania.

Authors:  Stephanie Kujawski; Godfrey Mbaruku; Lynn P Freedman; Kate Ramsey; Wema Moyo; Margaret E Kruk
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-10

2.  Disrespectful intrapartum care during facility-based delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis of women's perceptions and experiences.

Authors:  Susan Bradley; Christine McCourt; Juliet Rayment; Divya Parmar
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Childbirth traditions and cultural perceptions of safety in Nepal: critical spaces to ensure the survival of mothers and newborns in remote mountain villages.

Authors:  Sabitra Kaphle; Heather Hancock; Lareen A Newman
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.372

4.  Jeopardizing quality at the frontline of healthcare: prevalence and risk factors for disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Kathleen P Banks; Ali M Karim; Hannah L Ratcliffe; Wuleta Betemariam; Ana Langer
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 3.344

5.  Disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in southern Mozambique: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anna Galle; Helma Manaharlal; Emidio Cumbane; Joelma Picardo; Sally Griffin; Nafissa Osman; Kristien Roelens; Olivier Degomme
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Estimating the global impact of poor quality of care on maternal and neonatal outcomes in 81 low- and middle-income countries: A modeling study.

Authors:  Victoria B Chou; Neff Walker; Mufaro Kanyangarara
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  11 years of tracking aid to reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health: estimates and analysis for 2003-13 from the Countdown to 2015.

Authors:  Christopher Grollman; Leonardo Arregoces; Melisa Martínez-Álvarez; Catherine Pitt; Anne Mills; Josephine Borghi
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 26.763

8.  Effect of a scaled-up neonatal resuscitation quality improvement package on intrapartum-related mortality in Nepal: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ashish Kc; Uwe Ewald; Omkar Basnet; Abhishek Gurung; Sushil Nath Pyakuryal; Bijay Kumar Jha; Anna Bergström; Leif Eriksson; Prajwal Paudel; Sushil Karki; Sunil Gajurel; Olivia Brunell; Johan Wrammert; Helena Litorp; Mats Målqvist
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  The burden of misclassification of antepartum stillbirth in Nepal.

Authors:  Rejina Gurung; Helena Litorp; Sara Berkelhamer; Hong Zhou; Bhim Singh Tinkari; Prajwal Paudel; Honey Malla; Srijana Sharma; Ashish Kc
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-12-11

Review 10.  Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030.

Authors:  Joy E Lawn; Hannah Blencowe; Peter Waiswa; Agbessi Amouzou; Colin Mathers; Dan Hogan; Vicki Flenady; J Frederik Frøen; Zeshan U Qureshi; Claire Calderwood; Suhail Shiekh; Fiorella Bianchi Jassir; Danzhen You; Elizabeth M McClure; Matthews Mathai; Simon Cousens
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  High coverage but low quality of maternal and newborn health services in the coverage cascade: who is benefitted and left behind in accessing better quality health services in Nepal?

Authors:  Resham B Khatri; Jo Durham; Rajendra Karkee; Yibeltal Assefa
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.355

2.  Perceptions of Good-Quality Antenatal Care and Birthing Services among Postpartum Women in Nepal.

Authors:  Sushma Rajbanshi; Mohd Noor Norhayati; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.