E E A P Mulder1,2, K de Joode1, S Litière3, A J Ten Tije4, K P M Suijkerbuijk5, M J Boers-Sonderen6, G A P Hospers7, J W B de Groot8, A J M van den Eertwegh9, M J B Aarts10, D Piersma11, R S van Rijn12, E Kapiteijn13, G Vreugdenhil14, F W P J van den Berkmortel15, E Oomen-de Hoop1, M G Franken16, B Ryll17, P Rutkowski18, S Sleijfer1, J B A G Haanen19, A A M van der Veldt20,21. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Oncological Centre, Zwolle, The Netherlands. 9. Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre - location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 10. Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 11. Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 12. Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. 13. Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. 14. Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands. 15. Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands. 16. Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 17. Melanoma Patient Network Europe, Uppsala, Sweden. 18. Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland. 19. Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 20. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.vanderveldt@erasmusmc.nl. 21. Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.vanderveldt@erasmusmc.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The introduction of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockers (i.e. nivolumab and pembrolizumab) has significantly improved the prognosis of patients with advanced melanoma. However, the long treatment duration (i.e. two years or longer) has a high impact on patients and healthcare systems in terms of (severe) toxicity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), resource use, and healthcare costs. While durable tumour responses have been observed and PD-1 blockade is discontinued on an individual basis, no consensus has been reached on the optimal treatment duration. The objective of the Safe Stop trial is to evaluate whether early discontinuation of first-line PD-1 blockade is safe in patients with advanced and metastatic melanoma who achieve a radiological response. METHODS: The Safe Stop trial is a nationwide, multicentre, prospective, single-arm, interventional study in the Netherlands. A total of 200 patients with advanced and metastatic cutaneous melanoma and a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) v1.1 will be included to early discontinue first-line monotherapy with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. The primary objective is the rate of ongoing responses at 24 months after discontinuation of PD-1 blockade. Secondary objectives include best overall and duration of response, need and outcome of rechallenge with PD-1 blockade, and changes in (serious) adverse events and HRQoL. The impact of treatment discontinuation on healthcare resource use, productivity losses, and hours of informal care will also be assessed. Results will be compared to those from patients with CR or PR who completed 24 months of treatment with PD-1 blockade and had an ongoing response at treatment discontinuation. It is hypothesised that it is safe to early stop first-line nivolumab or pembrolizumab at confirmed tumour response while improving HRQoL and reducing costs. DISCUSSION: From a patient, healthcare, and economic perspective, shorter treatment duration is preferred and overtreatment should be prevented. If early discontinuation of first-line PD-1 blockade appears to be safe, early discontinuation of PD-1 blockade may be implemented as the standard of care in a selected group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Safe Stop trial has been registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), Trial NL7293 (old NTR ID: 7502), https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7293 . Date of registration September 30, 2018.
BACKGROUND: The introduction of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockers (i.e. nivolumab and pembrolizumab) has significantly improved the prognosis of patients with advanced melanoma. However, the long treatment duration (i.e. two years or longer) has a high impact on patients and healthcare systems in terms of (severe) toxicity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), resource use, and healthcare costs. While durable tumour responses have been observed and PD-1 blockade is discontinued on an individual basis, no consensus has been reached on the optimal treatment duration. The objective of the Safe Stop trial is to evaluate whether early discontinuation of first-line PD-1 blockade is safe in patients with advanced and metastatic melanoma who achieve a radiological response. METHODS: The Safe Stop trial is a nationwide, multicentre, prospective, single-arm, interventional study in the Netherlands. A total of 200 patients with advanced and metastatic cutaneous melanoma and a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) v1.1 will be included to early discontinue first-line monotherapy with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. The primary objective is the rate of ongoing responses at 24 months after discontinuation of PD-1 blockade. Secondary objectives include best overall and duration of response, need and outcome of rechallenge with PD-1 blockade, and changes in (serious) adverse events and HRQoL. The impact of treatment discontinuation on healthcare resource use, productivity losses, and hours of informal care will also be assessed. Results will be compared to those from patients with CR or PR who completed 24 months of treatment with PD-1 blockade and had an ongoing response at treatment discontinuation. It is hypothesised that it is safe to early stop first-line nivolumab or pembrolizumab at confirmed tumour response while improving HRQoL and reducing costs. DISCUSSION: From a patient, healthcare, and economic perspective, shorter treatment duration is preferred and overtreatment should be prevented. If early discontinuation of first-line PD-1 blockade appears to be safe, early discontinuation of PD-1 blockade may be implemented as the standard of care in a selected group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Safe Stop trial has been registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), Trial NL7293 (old NTR ID: 7502), https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7293 . Date of registration September 30, 2018.
Entities:
Keywords:
Advanced and metastatic; Health-related quality of life; Melanoma; PD-1 blockade; Response (complete or partial)
Authors: Caroline Robert; Georgina V Long; Benjamin Brady; Caroline Dutriaux; Michele Maio; Laurent Mortier; Jessica C Hassel; Piotr Rutkowski; Catriona McNeil; Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Kerry J Savage; Micaela M Hernberg; Celeste Lebbé; Julie Charles; Catalin Mihalcioiu; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Cornelia Mauch; Francesco Cognetti; Ana Arance; Henrik Schmidt; Dirk Schadendorf; Helen Gogas; Lotta Lundgren-Eriksson; Christine Horak; Brian Sharkey; Ian M Waxman; Victoria Atkinson; Paolo A Ascierto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dirk Schadendorf; Jedd D Wolchok; F Stephen Hodi; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Rene Gonzalez; Piotr Rutkowski; Jean-Jacques Grob; C Lance Cowey; Christopher D Lao; Jason Chesney; Caroline Robert; Kenneth Grossmann; David McDermott; Dana Walker; Rafia Bhore; James Larkin; Michael A Postow Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Caroline Robert; Antoni Ribas; Jacob Schachter; Ana Arance; Jean-Jacques Grob; Laurent Mortier; Adil Daud; Matteo S Carlino; Catriona M McNeil; Michal Lotem; James M G Larkin; Paul Lorigan; Bart Neyns; Christian U Blank; Teresa M Petrella; Omid Hamid; Shu-Chih Su; Clemens Krepler; Nageatte Ibrahim; Georgina V Long Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Caroline Robert; Jean J Grob; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Axel Hauschild; Evgeny Levchenko; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Jacob Schachter; Claus Garbe; Igor Bondarenko; Helen Gogas; Mario Mandalá; John B A G Haanen; Celeste Lebbé; Andrzej Mackiewicz; Piotr Rutkowski; Paul D Nathan; Antoni Ribas; Michael A Davies; Keith T Flaherty; Paul Burgess; Monique Tan; Eduard Gasal; Maurizio Voi; Dirk Schadendorf; Georgina V Long Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anouk Jochems; Maartje G Schouwenburg; Brenda Leeneman; Margreet G Franken; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; John B A G Haanen; Hans Gelderblom; Carin A Uyl-de Groot; Maureen J B Aarts; Franchette W P J van den Berkmortel; Willeke A M Blokx; Mathilde C Cardous-Ubbink; Gerard Groenewegen; Jan Willem B de Groot; Geke A P Hospers; Ellen Kapiteijn; Rutger H Koornstra; Wim H Kruit; Marieke W Louwman; Djura Piersma; Rozemarijn S van Rijn; Albert J Ten Tije; Gerard Vreugdenhil; Michel W J M Wouters; Jacobus J M van der Hoeven Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2016-12-25 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Clazien Bouwmans; Marieke Krol; Hans Severens; Marc Koopmanschap; Werner Brouwer; Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen Journal: Value Health Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Robert L Askew; Yan Xing; J Lynn Palmer; David Cella; Lemuel A Moye; Janice N Cormier Journal: Value Health Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Brenda Leeneman; Carin A Uyl-de Groot; Maureen J B Aarts; Alexander C J van Akkooi; Franchette W P J van den Berkmortel; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jan Willem B de Groot; Karin H Herbschleb; Jacobus J M van der Hoeven; Geke A P Hospers; Ellen Kapiteijn; Djura Piersma; Rozemarijn S van Rijn; Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk; Albert J Ten Tije; Astrid A M van der Veldt; Gerard Vreugdenhil; Michel W J M Wouters; John B A G Haanen; Margreet G Franken Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Charles Dolladille; Stéphane Ederhy; Marion Sassier; Jennifer Cautela; Franck Thuny; Ariel A Cohen; Sophie Fedrizzi; Basile Chrétien; Angélique Da-Silva; Anne-Flore Plane; Damien Legallois; Paul U Milliez; Véronique Lelong-Boulouard; Joachim Alexandre Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Michiel C T van Zeijl; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Michel W J M Wouters; Liesbeth C de Wreede; Maureen J B Aarts; Franchette W P J van den Berkmortel; Jan-Willem B de Groot; Geke A P Hospers; Ellen Kapiteijn; Djura Piersma; Rozemarijn S van Rijn; Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk; Albert J Ten Tije; Astrid A M van der Veldt; Gerard Vreugdenhil; Jacobus J M van der Hoeven; John B A G Haanen Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2021-10-02 Impact factor: 7.316