Literature DB >> 33765964

A core outcome set development for a French national prospective study about the effect of mediolateral episiotomy on obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery (INSTRUMODA).

Bertrand Gachon1,2,3, Thomas Schmitz4, France Artzner5, Olivier Parant6, Renaud De Tayrac7, Guillaume Ducarme8, Camille Le Ray9, Anne Cécile Pizzoferrato10, Charles Garabedian11, Didier Riethmuller12, Fabrice Pierre13, Stephanie Ragot14, Xavier Fritel13,14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed at developing a core outcome and variables of interest set to investigate the effects of mediolateral episiotomy on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (OASI) during and after operative delivery in nulliparous women in a large-scale one-year observational French study including 15,000 women (INSTRUMODA).
METHODS: A list of outcomes and variables of interest was suggested to obstetricians participating in the INSTRUMODA study using online questionnaires divided into 7 categories: the woman's history and course of pregnancy, course of labor, modalities of operative delivery, episiotomy characteristics, immediate maternal morbidity, one-year maternal morbidity, immediate neonatal morbidity. We used a three-round DELPHI method to reach a consensus. In the first round, outcomes and variables considered as essential by 70% or more of obstetricians were included in the corpus whereas they were excluded when 70% rated them as "not important". In the second round, non-consensual outcomes and variables were reassessed and excluded or definitively included if considered as "not important" or essential by 50% or more of the obstetricians. During the first round, obstetricians were invited to suggest new outcomes and/or variables that were then assessed in the second and third round. We used the same method to develop a core outcome and variables of interest set in a population of women in the community recruited via an association of patients. At the end of the procedure the core outcome and variables of interest sets were merged to provide the final core outcome set for the INSTRUMODA study.
RESULTS: Fifty-three obstetricians and 16 women filled out questionnaires. After the 3 rounds of Delphi procedure in each population, 74 outcomes and variables were consensually reported by obstetricians and 92 by women in the community. By mixing these two consensual corpora we reported a final consensual list of 114 variables of interest and outcomes for both obstetricians and women.
CONCLUSION: We established a core outcome and variables of interest set among obstetricians and women in the community to investigate the association between mediolateral episiotomy and OASI during operative delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The INSTRUMODA study was registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov on June 25, 2020 ( NCT04446780 ).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core outcome set; Episiotomy; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Operative delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33765964      PMCID: PMC7993449          DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03603-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth        ISSN: 1471-2393            Impact factor:   3.007


  15 in total

1.  The Montgomery ruling extends patient autonomy.

Authors:  Helen Bolton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 2.  The role of mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  A H Sultan; R Thakar; K M Ismail; V Kalis; K Laine; S H Räisänen; J W de Leeuw
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Does the implementation of a restrictive episiotomy policy for operative deliveries increase the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury?

Authors:  Bertrand Gachon; Carine Fradet Menard; Fabrice Pierre; Xavier Fritel
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  The effect of a mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery on the risk of developing obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.

Authors:  Joey de Vogel; Anneke van der Leeuw-van Beek; Dirk Gietelink; Marijana Vujkovic; Jan Willem de Leeuw; Jeroen van Bavel; Dimitri Papatsonis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics: CNGOF clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  G Ducarme; A C Pizzoferrato; R de Tayrac; C Schantz; T Thubert; C Le Ray; D Riethmuller; E Verspyck; B Gachon; F Pierre; F Artzner; B Jacquetin; X Fritel
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-12-12

Review 6.  [Anal incontinence and obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, epidemiology and prevention].

Authors:  X Fritel; B Gachon; D Desseauve; T Thubert
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol       Date:  2018-02-28

Review 7.  Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Xu Qian; Guillermo Carroli; Paul Garner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-08

Review 8.  Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth.

Authors:  Vasileios Pergialiotis; Dimitrios Vlachos; Athanasios Protopapas; Kaliopi Pappa; Georgios Vlachos
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  Assessing the impact of a research funder's recommendation to consider core outcome sets.

Authors:  Karen L Hughes; Jamie J Kirkham; Mike Clarke; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.

Authors:  Jamie J Kirkham; Sarah Gorst; Douglas G Altman; Jane M Blazeby; Mike Clarke; Declan Devane; Elizabeth Gargon; David Moher; Jochen Schmitt; Peter Tugwell; Sean Tunis; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  4 in total

1.  Core Outcome Sets (COS) related to pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marie Österberg; Christel Hellberg; Ann Kristine Jonsson; Sara Fundell; Frida Trönnberg; Alkistis Skalkidou; Maria Jonsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  French guidelines for restrictive episiotomy during instrumental delivery were not followed by an increase in obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Bertrand Gachon; Xavier Fritel; Olivier Rivière; Bruno Pereira; Françoise Vendittelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  A balanced perspective on intervention at full dilation.

Authors:  Melissa Walker; Evan Tannenbaum; Nicole Cohen; Kristin Harris; John Kingdom; Jacqueline Thomas; Rory Windrim; Sebastian Hobson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 16.859

4.  Prospective observational study investigating the effectiveness, safety, women's experiences and quality of life at 3 months regarding cervical ripening methods for induction of labor at term-The MATUCOL study protocol.

Authors:  Guillaume Ducarme; Stephanie Martin; Veronique Chesnoy; Lucie Planche; Marie-Pierre Berte; Elodie Netier-Herault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.