Nahya Salim1,2, Josephine Shabani3, Louise T Day4, Joy E Lawn4, Kimberly Peven4,5, Qazi Sadeq-Ur Rahman6, Ashish Kc7, Donat Shamba3, Harriet Ruysen4, Ahmed Ehsanur Rahman6, Naresh Kc8, Namala Mkopi9, Sojib Bin Zaman6, Kizito Shirima3, Shafiqul Ameen6, Stefanie Kong4, Omkar Basnet10, Karim Manji11, Theopista John Kabuteni12, Helen Brotherton4, Sarah G Moxon4, Agbessi Amouzou13, Tedbabe Degefie Hailegebriel14. 1. Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. nsalim@ihi.or.tz. 2. Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute (IHI), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. nsalim@ihi.or.tz. 3. Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute (IHI), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 4. Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 5. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Kings College London, London, UK. 6. Maternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (iccdr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh. 7. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 8. Ministry of Health, Department of Health Services, Kathmandu, Nepal. 9. Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. 10. Golden Community, Kathmandu, Nepal. 11. Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 12. Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Aging, World Health Organization (WHO), Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. 13. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 14. UNICEF, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) reduces mortality among stable neonates ≤2000 g. Lack of data tracking coverage and quality of KMC in both surveys and routine information systems impedes scale-up. This paper evaluates KMC measurement as part of the Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study. METHODS: The EN-BIRTH observational mixed-methods study was conducted in five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal and Tanzania from 2017 to 2018. Clinical observers collected time-stamped data as gold standard for mother-baby pairs in KMC wards/corners. To assess accuracy, we compared routine register-recorded and women's exit survey-reported coverage to observed data, using different recommended denominator options (≤2000 g and ≤ 2499 g). We analysed gaps in quality of provision and experience of KMC. In the Tanzanian hospitals, we assessed daily skin-to-skin duration/dose and feeding frequency. Qualitative data were collected from health workers and data collectors regarding barriers and enablers to routine register design, filling and use. RESULTS: Among 840 mother-baby pairs, compared to observed 100% coverage, both exit-survey reported (99.9%) and register-recorded coverage (92.9%) were highly valid measures with high sensitivity. KMC specific registers outperformed general registers. Enablers to register recording included perceptions of data usefulness, while barriers included duplication of data elements and overburdened health workers. Gaps in KMC quality were identified for position components including wearing a hat. In Temeke Tanzania, 10.6% of babies received daily KMC skin-to-skin duration/dose of ≥20 h and a further 75.3% received 12-19 h. Regular feeding ≥8 times/day was observed for 36.5% babies in Temeke Tanzania and 14.6% in Muhimbili Tanzania. Cup-feeding was the predominant assisted feeding method. Family support during admission was variable, grandmothers co-provided KMC more often in Bangladesh. No facility arrangements for other family members were reported by 45% of women at exit survey. CONCLUSIONS: Routine hospital KMC register data have potential to track coverage from hospital KMC wards/corners. Women accurately reported KMC at exit survey and evaluation for population-based surveys could be considered. Measurement of content, quality and experience of KMC need consensus on definitions. Prioritising further KMC measurement research is important so that high quality data can be used to accelerate scale-up of high impact care for the most vulnerable.
BACKGROUND: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) reduces mortality among stable neonates ≤2000 g. Lack of data tracking coverage and quality of KMC in both surveys and routine information systems impedes scale-up. This paper evaluates KMC measurement as part of the Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study. METHODS: The EN-BIRTH observational mixed-methods study was conducted in five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal and Tanzania from 2017 to 2018. Clinical observers collected time-stamped data as gold standard for mother-baby pairs in KMC wards/corners. To assess accuracy, we compared routine register-recorded and women's exit survey-reported coverage to observed data, using different recommended denominator options (≤2000 g and ≤ 2499 g). We analysed gaps in quality of provision and experience of KMC. In the Tanzanian hospitals, we assessed daily skin-to-skin duration/dose and feeding frequency. Qualitative data were collected from health workers and data collectors regarding barriers and enablers to routine register design, filling and use. RESULTS: Among 840 mother-baby pairs, compared to observed 100% coverage, both exit-survey reported (99.9%) and register-recorded coverage (92.9%) were highly valid measures with high sensitivity. KMC specific registers outperformed general registers. Enablers to register recording included perceptions of data usefulness, while barriers included duplication of data elements and overburdened health workers. Gaps in KMC quality were identified for position components including wearing a hat. In Temeke Tanzania, 10.6% of babies received daily KMC skin-to-skin duration/dose of ≥20 h and a further 75.3% received 12-19 h. Regular feeding ≥8 times/day was observed for 36.5% babies in Temeke Tanzania and 14.6% in Muhimbili Tanzania. Cup-feeding was the predominant assisted feeding method. Family support during admission was variable, grandmothers co-provided KMC more often in Bangladesh. No facility arrangements for other family members were reported by 45% of women at exit survey. CONCLUSIONS: Routine hospital KMC register data have potential to track coverage from hospital KMC wards/corners. Women accurately reported KMC at exit survey and evaluation for population-based surveys could be considered. Measurement of content, quality and experience of KMC need consensus on definitions. Prioritising further KMC measurement research is important so that high quality data can be used to accelerate scale-up of high impact care for the most vulnerable.
Authors: Hannah Blencowe; Simon Cousens; Mikkel Z Oestergaard; Doris Chou; Ann-Beth Moller; Rajesh Narwal; Alma Adler; Claudia Vera Garcia; Sarah Rohde; Lale Say; Joy E Lawn Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-06-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sarah G Moxon; Harriet Ruysen; Kate J Kerber; Agbessi Amouzou; Suzanne Fournier; John Grove; Allisyn C Moran; Lara M E Vaz; Hannah Blencowe; Niall Conroy; A Gülmezoglu; Joshua P Vogel; Barbara Rawlins; Rubayet Sayed; Kathleen Hill; Donna Vivio; Shamim A Qazi; Deborah Sitrin; Anna C Seale; Steve Wall; Troy Jacobs; Juan Ruiz Peláez; Tanya Guenther; Patricia S Coffey; Penny Dawson; Tanya Marchant; Peter Waiswa; Ashok Deorari; Christabel Enweronu-Laryea; Shams Arifeen; Anne C C Lee; Matthews Mathai; Joy E Lawn Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Li Liu; Shefali Oza; Dan Hogan; Yue Chu; Jamie Perin; Jun Zhu; Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Katharine J McCarthy; Ann K Blanc; Charlotte E Warren; James Kimani; Brian Mdawida; Charity Ndwidga Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.413
Authors: Melinda K Munos; Ann K Blanc; Emily D Carter; Thomas P Eisele; Steve Gesuale; Joanne Katz; Tanya Marchant; Cynthia K Stanton; Harry Campbell Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 4.413
Authors: Hannah Blencowe; Julia Krasevec; Mercedes de Onis; Robert E Black; Xiaoyi An; Gretchen A Stevens; Elaine Borghi; Chika Hayashi; Diana Estevez; Luca Cegolon; Suhail Shiekh; Victoria Ponce Hardy; Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Helen Brotherton; Abdou Gai; Cally J Tann; Ahmadou Lamin Samateh; Anna C Seale; Syed M A Zaman; Simon Cousens; Anna Roca; Joy E Lawn Journal: Trials Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Giorgia Brambilla Pisoni; Christine Gaulis; Silvan Suter; Michel A Rochat; Solomzi Makohliso; Matthias Roth-Kleiner; Michiko Kyokan; Riccardo E Pfister; Klaus Schönenberger Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-04-07