Jialin Zhu1,2, Junwei Sun1,2, Rui Li2, Yanbing Yu2, Li Zhang3. 1. Graduate School of Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, No. 2 Yinghua Dongjie, Hepingli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, No. 2 Yinghua Dongjie, Hepingli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China. allan18910586699@163.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the preferred surgical method for hemifacial spasm (HFS). The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of fully endoscopic MVD for HFS relative to microscopic MVD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted on HFS patients who underwent microscopic or fully endoscopic MVD from January 2018 to March 2019. All patients were treated at a single institution and by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical method, and clinical data were then compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients, including 54 cases who received fully endoscopic MVD (E group) and 62 cases who received microscopic MVD (M group), were included in this study. Follow-up efficacy did not differ significantly between groups, with total effective rates of 88.9% in the E group and 90.3% in the M group. When postoperative complications were compared individually, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups; however, the E group had a higher total incidence of complications than the M group (48.1% vs. 29.0%, P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Although both fully endoscopic and microscopic MVD for HFS achieved good efficacy, the former method had a higher total incidence of complications. Based on the results of this study, there is no evidence that a microscope can be replaced by a full endoscope in MVD for HFS.
INTRODUCTION: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the preferred surgical method for hemifacial spasm (HFS). The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of fully endoscopic MVD for HFS relative to microscopic MVD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted on HFSpatients who underwent microscopic or fully endoscopic MVD from January 2018 to March 2019. All patients were treated at a single institution and by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical method, and clinical data were then compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients, including 54 cases who received fully endoscopic MVD (E group) and 62 cases who received microscopic MVD (M group), were included in this study. Follow-up efficacy did not differ significantly between groups, with total effective rates of 88.9% in the E group and 90.3% in the M group. When postoperative complications were compared individually, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups; however, the E group had a higher total incidence of complications than the M group (48.1% vs. 29.0%, P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Although both fully endoscopic and microscopic MVD for HFS achieved good efficacy, the former method had a higher total incidence of complications. Based on the results of this study, there is no evidence that a microscope can be replaced by a full endoscope in MVD for HFS.
Entities:
Keywords:
Full endoscope; Functional neurosurgery; Hemifacial spasm; Microvascular decompression