Matthew Kimble1, William Flack2, Jennifer Koide1, Kelly Bennion3, Miranda Brenneman4, Cynthia Meyersburg5. 1. Department of Psychology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America. 2. Department of Psychology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, United States of America. 3. Department of Psychology and Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, United States of America. 4. Department of Psychology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, South Carolina, United States of America. 5. Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: While trigger warnings have garnered significant debate, few studies have investigated how students typically respond to potentially triggering material. METHOD: In this study, three hundred and fifty-five undergraduate students from four universities read a passage describing incidences of both physical and sexual assault. Longitudinal measures of subjective distress, PTSD symptoms, and emotional reactivity were taken. RESULTS: Greater than 96% of participants read the triggering passage even when given a non-triggering alternative to read. Of those who read the triggering passage, those with triggering traumas did not report more distress although those with higher PTSD scores did. Two weeks later, those with trigger traumas and/or PTSD did not report an increase in trauma symptoms as a result of reading the triggering passage. CONCLUSIONS: Students with relevant traumas do not avoid triggering material and the effects appear to be brief. Students with PTSD do not report an exacerbation of symptoms two weeks later as a function of reading the passage.
INTRODUCTION: While trigger warnings have garnered significant debate, few studies have investigated how students typically respond to potentially triggering material. METHOD: In this study, three hundred and fifty-five undergraduate students from four universities read a passage describing incidences of both physical and sexual assault. Longitudinal measures of subjective distress, PTSD symptoms, and emotional reactivity were taken. RESULTS: Greater than 96% of participants read the triggering passage even when given a non-triggering alternative to read. Of those who read the triggering passage, those with triggering traumas did not report more distress although those with higher PTSD scores did. Two weeks later, those with trigger traumas and/or PTSD did not report an increase in trauma symptoms as a result of reading the triggering passage. CONCLUSIONS: Students with relevant traumas do not avoid triggering material and the effects appear to be brief. Students with PTSD do not report an exacerbation of symptoms two weeks later as a function of reading the passage.
Authors: Elizabeth A Beverly; Sebastián Díaz; Anna M Kerr; Jane T Balbo; Kayla E Prokopakis; Todd R Fredricks Journal: Teach Learn Med Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 2.414
Authors: Benjamin W Bellet; Payton J Jones; Cynthia A Meyersburg; Miranda M Brenneman; Kaitlin E Morehead; Richard J McNally Journal: J Exp Psychol Appl Date: 2020-04-13
Authors: Ashleigh Charles; Laurie Hare-Duke; Hannah Nudds; Donna Franklin; Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley; Stefan Rennick-Egglestone; Onni Gust; Fiona Ng; Elizabeth Evans; Emily Knox; Ellen Townsend; Caroline Yeo; Mike Slade Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 3.752