Dana Brandenburger1, Elena Ambrosino2. 1. Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research School GROW (School for Oncology & Development), Institute for Public Health Genomics (IPHG), Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mother-to-child transmission of syphilis remains a leading cause of neonatal death and stillbirth, disproportionally affecting women in low-resource settings where syphilis prevalence rates are high and testing rates low. Recently developed syphilis point-of-care tests (POCTs) are promising alternatives to conventional laboratory screening in low-resource settings as they do not require a laboratory setting, intensive technical training and yield results in 10-15 minutes thereby enabling both diagnosis and treatment in a single visit. Aim of this review was to provide clarity on the benefits of different POCTs and assess whether the implementation of syphilis POCTs is associated with decreased numbers of syphilis-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines, three electronic databases (PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Cochrane) were systematically searched for intervention studies and cost-effectiveness analyses investigating the association between antenatal syphilis POCT and pregnancy outcomes such as congenital syphilis, low birth weight, prematurity, miscarriage, stillbirth as well as perinatal, fetal or infant death. RESULTS: Nine out of 278 initially identified articles were included, consisting of two clinical studies and seven modelling studies. Studies compared the effect on pregnancy outcomes of treponemal POCT, non-treponemal POCT and dual POCT to laboratory screening and no screening program. Based on the clinical studies, significantly higher testing and treatment rates, as well as a significant reduction (93%) in adverse pregnancy outcomes was reported for treponemal POCT compared to laboratory screening. Compared to no screening and laboratory screening, modelling studies assumed higher treatment rates for POCT and predicted the most prevented adverse pregnancy outcomes for treponemal POCT, followed by a dual treponemal and non-treponemal POCT strategy. CONCLUSION: Implementation of treponemal POCT in low-resource settings increases syphilis testing and treatment rates and prevents the most syphilis-related adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to no screening, laboratory screening, non-treponemal POCT and dual POCT. Regarding the benefits of dual POCT, more research is needed. Overall, this review provides evidence on the contribution of treponemal POCT to healthier pregnancies and contributes greater clarity on the impact of diverse diagnostic methods available for the detection of syphilis.
BACKGROUND: Mother-to-child transmission of syphilis remains a leading cause of neonatal death and stillbirth, disproportionally affecting women in low-resource settings where syphilis prevalence rates are high and testing rates low. Recently developed syphilis point-of-care tests (POCTs) are promising alternatives to conventional laboratory screening in low-resource settings as they do not require a laboratory setting, intensive technical training and yield results in 10-15 minutes thereby enabling both diagnosis and treatment in a single visit. Aim of this review was to provide clarity on the benefits of different POCTs and assess whether the implementation of syphilis POCTs is associated with decreased numbers of syphilis-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines, three electronic databases (PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Cochrane) were systematically searched for intervention studies and cost-effectiveness analyses investigating the association between antenatal syphilis POCT and pregnancy outcomes such as congenital syphilis, low birth weight, prematurity, miscarriage, stillbirth as well as perinatal, fetal or infant death. RESULTS: Nine out of 278 initially identified articles were included, consisting of two clinical studies and seven modelling studies. Studies compared the effect on pregnancy outcomes of treponemal POCT, non-treponemal POCT and dual POCT to laboratory screening and no screening program. Based on the clinical studies, significantly higher testing and treatment rates, as well as a significant reduction (93%) in adverse pregnancy outcomes was reported for treponemal POCT compared to laboratory screening. Compared to no screening and laboratory screening, modelling studies assumed higher treatment rates for POCT and predicted the most prevented adverse pregnancy outcomes for treponemal POCT, followed by a dual treponemal and non-treponemal POCT strategy. CONCLUSION: Implementation of treponemal POCT in low-resource settings increases syphilis testing and treatment rates and prevents the most syphilis-related adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to no screening, laboratory screening, non-treponemal POCT and dual POCT. Regarding the benefits of dual POCT, more research is needed. Overall, this review provides evidence on the contribution of treponemal POCT to healthier pregnancies and contributes greater clarity on the impact of diverse diagnostic methods available for the detection of syphilis.
Authors: Cornelis A Rietmeijer; More Mungati; Peter H Kilmarx; Beth Tippett Barr; Elizabeth Gonese; Ranmini S Kularatne; David A Lewis; Jeffrey D Klausner; Luanne Rodgers; H Hunter Handsfield Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Linda Severe; Daphne Benoit; Xi K Zhou; Jean W Pape; Rosanna W Peeling; Daniel W Fitzgerald; Kedar S Mate Journal: J Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-12-22
Authors: Andreas Kuznik; Christine Muhumuza; Henry Komakech; Elsa M R Marques; Mohammed Lamorde Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bruce R Schackman; Christopher P Neukermans; Sandy N Nerette Fontain; Claudine Nolte; Patrice Joseph; Jean W Pape; Daniel W Fitzgerald Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jeremiah Laktabai; Victoria L Mobley; Wendy Prudhomme-O'Meara; Steve M Taylor Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 3.707
Authors: Silver K Vargas; Jazmin Qquellon; Francesca Vasquez; Kelika A Konda; Gino Calvo; Michael Reyes-Diaz; Carlos Caceres; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: Microbiol Spectr Date: 2022-05-31