Kuauhyama Luna-Ortiz1,2, Hugo Dominguez-Malagon3, Guillermo E Corredor-Alonso3, Nancy Reynoso-Noveron4, Cesar Herrera-Ponzanelli5, Zelik Luna-Peteuil6, Luis C Zacarias-Ramon5. 1. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (Mexico), Av San Fernando # 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico. kuauhyama@yahoo.com.mx. 2. Department of General Surgery (Head and Neck), Hospital Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Mexico City, Mexico. kuauhyama@yahoo.com.mx. 3. Department of Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (Mexico), Av San Fernando # 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico. 4. Research Department at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (Mexico), Av San Fernando # 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico. 5. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (Mexico), Av San Fernando # 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico. 6. General Medicine, Universitatea de Medicinâ si Farmacie Grigorie T. Popa IASI, Iasi, Romania.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Salivary gland tumors are rare and include benign and malignant entities with different behavior and prognosis. Salivary gland carcinoma accounts for 0.2% of all cancers and 5-9% of head and neck carcinomas. We aim to describe the clinicopathological characteristics and discuss the immunohistochemical findings of salivary ductal carcinoma. METHODS: We obtained 17 cases (2.3%) of salivary ductal carcinoma (SDC) from 727 patients with parotid tumors at our cancer center from a database covering a 22-year period (1996-2018). Two pathologists confirmed the diagnosis and excluded 6 cases. Eleven cases were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR), mammaglobin, P53, GATA3, S100, cytokeratins (7,8,14,18, and 20), P63, PAX8, calponin, and SOX10. RESULTS: Eleven SDC cases were in advanced stage, and 80% had metastasis. All cases were surgically treated, and 40% received different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. we found that most patients were dead of disease. The histological and immunohistochemical analysis showed that 70% of cases were high-grade, 40% were positive for HER2, and 50% for AR. Moreover, a high Ki-67 proliferative index was detected in all cases. We observed luminal differentiation in 50% of cases. CONCLUSION: SDC is a rare entity and survival is very poor. It is histologically similar to ductal carcinoma of the breast. However, important differences exist that help to distinguish them in case of synchronous cancers. The clinical behavior of SDC seems to be more aggressive and IHC analysis is useful for designing therapies.
PURPOSE: Salivary gland tumors are rare and include benign and malignant entities with different behavior and prognosis. Salivary gland carcinoma accounts for 0.2% of all cancers and 5-9% of head and neck carcinomas. We aim to describe the clinicopathological characteristics and discuss the immunohistochemical findings of salivary ductal carcinoma. METHODS: We obtained 17 cases (2.3%) of salivary ductal carcinoma (SDC) from 727 patients with parotid tumors at our cancer center from a database covering a 22-year period (1996-2018). Two pathologists confirmed the diagnosis and excluded 6 cases. Eleven cases were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR), mammaglobin, P53, GATA3, S100, cytokeratins (7,8,14,18, and 20), P63, PAX8, calponin, and SOX10. RESULTS: Eleven SDC cases were in advanced stage, and 80% had metastasis. All cases were surgically treated, and 40% received different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. we found that most patients were dead of disease. The histological and immunohistochemical analysis showed that 70% of cases were high-grade, 40% were positive for HER2, and 50% for AR. Moreover, a high Ki-67 proliferative index was detected in all cases. We observed luminal differentiation in 50% of cases. CONCLUSION: SDC is a rare entity and survival is very poor. It is histologically similar to ductal carcinoma of the breast. However, important differences exist that help to distinguish them in case of synchronous cancers. The clinical behavior of SDC seems to be more aggressive and IHC analysis is useful for designing therapies.