Bijesh R Nair1, Mariappan Ramamani2, Georgene Singh2, Krothapalli Srinivasa Babu1, Vedantam Rajshekhar3. 1. Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632004, India. 2. Department of Neuroanesthesia, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. 3. Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632004, India. rajshekhar@cmcvellore.ac.in.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study documents the monitorability using different anesthesia regimes and accuracy of muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) in children ≤2 years of age undergoing tethered cord surgery (TCS). METHODS: Intraoperative mMEP monitoring was attempted in 100 consecutive children, ≤2 years of age, undergoing TCS. MEP monitoring was done under 4 different anesthetic regimes: (Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA); balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane and ketamine; balanced anesthesia with isoflurane and ketamine; and balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane). Factors analyzed for their effect on monitorability were: age, neurological deficits, type of anesthesia, and the number of pulses used for stimulation. RESULTS: Baseline mMEPs were obtained in 87% children. Monitorability of mMEPs was similar in children ≤1 year and 1-2 years of age (85.7% and 87.5%). In multivariate analysis, anesthesia regime was the only significant factor predicting presence of baseline mMEPs. Children undergoing TIVA (p=0.02) or balanced anesthesia with a combination of propofol, sevoflurane, and ketamine (p=0.05) were most likely to have baseline mMEPs. mMEPs had a sensitivity of 97.4%, specificity of 96.4%, negative predictive value of 98.2% and accuracy of 96.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline mMEPs were obtained in >85% of children ≤2 years of age including those who had motor deficits. TIVA and balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane and ketamine are ideal for mMEP monitoring. mMEPs have a high accuracy although, false positive and false negative results can occasionally be experienced.
OBJECTIVE: This study documents the monitorability using different anesthesia regimes and accuracy of muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) in children ≤2 years of age undergoing tethered cord surgery (TCS). METHODS: Intraoperative mMEP monitoring was attempted in 100 consecutive children, ≤2 years of age, undergoing TCS. MEP monitoring was done under 4 different anesthetic regimes: (Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA); balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane and ketamine; balanced anesthesia with isoflurane and ketamine; and balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane). Factors analyzed for their effect on monitorability were: age, neurological deficits, type of anesthesia, and the number of pulses used for stimulation. RESULTS: Baseline mMEPs were obtained in 87% children. Monitorability of mMEPs was similar in children ≤1 year and 1-2 years of age (85.7% and 87.5%). In multivariate analysis, anesthesia regime was the only significant factor predicting presence of baseline mMEPs. Children undergoing TIVA (p=0.02) or balanced anesthesia with a combination of propofol, sevoflurane, and ketamine (p=0.05) were most likely to have baseline mMEPs. mMEPs had a sensitivity of 97.4%, specificity of 96.4%, negative predictive value of 98.2% and accuracy of 96.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline mMEPs were obtained in >85% of children ≤2 years of age including those who had motor deficits. TIVA and balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane and ketamine are ideal for mMEP monitoring. mMEPs have a high accuracy although, false positive and false negative results can occasionally be experienced.
Entities:
Keywords:
Children; Intra-operative monitoring; Motor evoked potentials; Tethered cord surgery
Authors: Daniel H Fulkerson; Krishna B Satyan; Lillian M Wilder; James J Riviello; Stephen A Stayer; William E Whitehead; Daniel J Curry; Robert C Dauser; Thomas G Luerssen; Andrew Jea Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 2.375