Literature DB >> 33763360

A Substage Increase in The AJCC Classification System Improves Prognostic Prediction in Stage III Gastric Cancer With Insufficient Lymph Nodes Removed.

Ri-Sheng Zhao1,2, Yi-Nan Liu1,2, Wei-Gang Dai1,2, Si-Le Chen1,2, Jin-Ning Ye1,2, Er-Tao Zhai1,2, Shi-Rong Cai1,2, Jian-Hui Chen1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of lymph nodes (LNs) removed on the survivals of patients with stage III gastric cancer, especially on that of those who undergo the adjuvant chemotherapy as a compensation for a possibly insufficient lymphadenectomy, is still unclear.
METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 488) with stage III gastric cancer under R0 curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed. The overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with insufficient LNs removed (ILNr, <16 LNs) and sufficient LNs removed (SLNr, ≥16 LNs). Performance of the prediction systems was evaluated using the Likelihood ratio χ2 test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), Harrell's concordance index (C-index), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC).
RESULTS: The OS of patients were significantly longer in those with SLNr relative to those with ILNr (for stage IIIA, 68.2 vs. 43.2 months, P = 0.042; for stage IIIB, 43.7 vs. 24.9 months, P < 0.001; for stage IIIC, 23.9 vs. 8.3 months, P < 0.001; and for total stage III, 37.7 vs. 21.7 months, P < 0.001). However, the OS were similar between stage IIIA patients with ILNr and stage IIIB patients with SLNr (P = 0.928), between IIIB patients with ILNr and IIIC patients with SLNr (P = 0.962), and IIIC patients with ILNr and stage IV (P = 0.668), respectively. A substage increase in the AJCC classification system, from IIIA to IIIB, from IIIB to IIIC, and from IIIC to IV in patients with ILNr, enhanced the accuracy of prognostic prediction in patients with stage III gastric cancer compared to the current TNM system (Likelihood ratio χ2, 188.6 vs. 184.8; AIC, 4336.4 vs. 4340.6; C-index, 0.695 vs. 0.679, P = 0.002). The ROC curves revealed that the performance of prognostic prediction was better in the new prediction system (AUC = 0.699) compared with the current TNM system (AUC = 0.676).
CONCLUSIONS: ILNr (LNs <16) impairs the long-term outcomes of stage III gastric cancer underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. The status of LNs removal adds values to the current TNM system in prognostic prediction of stage III gastric cancer.
Copyright © 2021 Zhao, Liu, Dai, Chen, Ye, Zhai, Cai and Chen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastric cancer; lymph nodes removed; overall survival; stage III; stage migration

Year:  2021        PMID: 33763360      PMCID: PMC7982898          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.624413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  20 in total

1.  Impact on survival of the number of lymph nodes removed in patients with node-negative gastric cancer submitted to extended lymph node dissection.

Authors:  R Biffi; E Botteri; S Cenciarelli; F Luca; S Pozzi; M Valvo; A Sonzogni; A Chiappa; T Leal Ghezzi; N Rotmensz; V Bagnardi; B Andreoni
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Number and anatomical extent of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: analysis using intra-lymph node injection of activated carbon particles (CH40).

Authors:  K Okamoto; K Sawai; H Minato; H Yada; M Shirasu; C Sakakura; E Otsuji; K Kitamura; H Taniguchi; A Hagiwara; T Yamaguchi; T Takahashi
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Lymphadenectomy with Optimum of 29 Lymph Nodes Retrieved Associated with Improved Survival in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A 25,000-Patient International Database Study.

Authors:  Yanghee Woo; Bryan Goldner; Philip Ituarte; Byrne Lee; Laleh Melstrom; Taeil Son; Sung Hoon Noh; Yuman Fong; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Effect of the number of lymph nodes harvested on the long-term survival of gastric cancer patients according to tumor stage and location: a 12-year study of 1,637 cases.

Authors:  Zhanlong Shen; Yingjiang Ye; Qiwei Xie; Bin Liang; Kewei Jiang; Shan Wang
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jaffer A Ajani; Jeeyun Lee; Takeshi Sano; Yelena Y Janjigian; Daiming Fan; Shumei Song
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 52.329

6.  Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; R M Califf; D B Pryor; R A Rosati
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1984 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Characterization of lymph node metastasis and its clinical significance in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chao-Hui Zuo; Hailong Xie; Jingshi Liu; Xiao-Xin Qiu; Jin-Guan Lin; Xiao Hua; Ang Qin
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-03

8.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Comparison of the 7th and the 8th AJCC Staging System for Non-metastatic D2-Resected Lymph Node-Positive Gastric Cancer Treated with Different Adjuvant Protocols.

Authors:  Jeong Il Yu; Do Hoon Lim; Jeeyun Lee; Won Ki Kang; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Seung Tae Kim; Su Jin Lee; Sung Kim; Tae Sung Sohn; Jun Ho Lee; Ji Yeong An; Min Gew Choi; Jae Moon Bae; Heejin Yoo; Kyunga Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.