Literature DB >> 33762917

Multimodal Assessment of Precentral Anodal TDCS: Individual Rise in Supplementary Motor Activity Scales With Increase in Corticospinal Excitability.

Anke Ninija Karabanov1,2, Keiichiro Shindo1,3, Yuko Shindo1,3, Estelle Raffin1,4, Hartwig Roman Siebner1,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) targeting the primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) may induce lasting shifts in corticospinal excitability, but after-effects show substantial inter-individual variability. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can probe after-effects of TDCS on regional neural activity on a whole-brain level.
OBJECTIVE: Using a double-blinded cross-over design, we investigated whether the individual change in corticospinal excitability after TDCS of M1-HAND is associated with changes in task-related regional activity in cortical motor areas.
METHODS: Seventeen healthy volunteers (10 women) received 20 min of real (0.75 mA) or sham TDCS on separate days in randomized order. Real and sham TDCS used the classic bipolar set-up with the anode placed over right M1-HAND. Before and after each TDCS session, we recorded motor evoked potentials (MEP) from the relaxed left first dorsal interosseus muscle after single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation(TMS) of left M1-HAND and performed whole-brain fMRI at 3 Tesla while participants completed a visuomotor tracking task with their left hand. We also assessed the difference in MEP latency when applying anterior-posterior and latero-medial TMS pulses to the precentral hand knob (AP-LM MEP latency).
RESULTS: Real TDCS had no consistent aftereffects on mean MEP amplitude, task-related activity or motor performance. Individual changes in MEP amplitude, measured directly after real TDCS showed a positive linear relationship with individual changes in task-related activity in the supplementary motor area and AP-LM MEP latency.
CONCLUSION: Functional aftereffects of classical bipolar anodal TDCS of M1-HAND on the motor system vary substantially across individuals. Physiological features upstream from the primary motor cortex may determine how anodal TDCS changes corticospinal excitability.
Copyright © 2021 Karabanov, Shindo, Shindo, Raffin and Siebner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); inter-individual variability; motor evoked potentials; non-invasive brain stimulation; primary motor cortex (M1); supplementary motor area (SMA); transcrancial magnetic stimulation (TMS); transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33762917      PMCID: PMC7982814          DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.639274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5161            Impact factor:   3.169


  42 in total

1.  The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Masashi Hamada; Nagako Murase; Alkomiet Hasan; Michelle Balaratnam; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Different cortical activation patterns during voluntary eccentric and concentric muscle contractions: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Yong-Hyun Kwon; Ji-Won Park
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.138

4.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the cortical activation by motor task in the human brain: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Sung Ho Jang; Sang Ho Ahn; Woo Mok Byun; Chung Sun Kim; Mi Young Lee; Yong Hyun Kwon
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation in head model with morphologically-realistic cortical neurons.

Authors:  Aman S Aberra; Boshuo Wang; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Neuroplasticity in cigarette smokers is altered under withdrawal and partially restituted by nicotine exposition.

Authors:  Jessica Grundey; Nivethida Thirugnanasambandam; Kim Kaminsky; Anne Drees; Angela C Skwirba; Nicolas Lang; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Modulation of I-wave generating pathways by theta-burst stimulation: a model of plasticity induction.

Authors:  Lukas J Volz; Masashi Hamada; Jochen Michely; Eva-Maria Pool; Charlotte Nettekoven; John C Rothwell; Christian Grefkes Hermann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Predicting Modulation in Corticomotor Excitability and in Transcallosal Inhibition in Response to Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Travis W Davidson; Miodrag Bolic; François Tremblay
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Use-Dependent Plasticity in Human Primary Motor Hand Area: Synergistic Interplay Between Training and Immobilization.

Authors:  Estelle Raffin; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  2 in total

1.  Use of a Brain Navigator to Identify the Precentral Knob of the Precentral Gyrus in Normal Subjects.

Authors:  Sung Ho Jang; Han Do Lee; Eun Bi Choi
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-01-18

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the posterior parietal cortex improves visuomotor performance and proprioception in the lower extremities.

Authors:  Yasushi Kamii; Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.473

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.