Literature DB >> 33762642

Increasing availability of palatable prey induces predator-dependence and increases predation on unpalatable prey.

Thomas J Hossie1, Kevin Chan2, Dennis L Murray2.   

Abstract

Understanding the factors governing predation remains a top priority in ecology. Using a dragonfly nymph-tadpole system, we experimentally varied predator density, prey density, and prey species ratio to investigate: (i) whether predator interference varies between prey types that differ in palatability, (ii) whether adding alternate prey influences the magnitude of predator interference, and (iii) whether patterns of prey selection vary according to the predictions of optimal diet theory. In single-prey foraging trials, predation of palatable leopard frog tadpoles was limited by prey availability and predator interference, whereas predation of unpalatable toad tadpoles was limited by handling time. Adding unpalatable prey did not affect the predator's kill rate of palatable prey, but the presence of palatable prey increased the influence of predator density on the kill rate of unpalatable prey and reduced unpalatable prey handling time. Prey selection did not change with shifts in the relative abundance of prey types. Instead, predators selected easy-to-capture unpalatable prey at low total densities and harder-to-capture palatable prey at high densities. These results improve our understanding of generalist predation in communities with mobile prey, and illustrate that characteristics of the prey types involved govern the extent to which alternate prey influence the predator's kill rate.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33762642     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86080-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  20 in total

1.  Adaptive host preference and the dynamics of host-parasitoid interactions.

Authors:  P A Abrams; T J Kawecki
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  Systematic bias in studies of consumer functional responses.

Authors:  Mark Novak; Daniel B Stouffer
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Underestimation of mutual interference of predators.

Authors:  R Arditi; H R Akçakaya
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The adaptation of generalist predators' diet in a multi-prey context: insights from new functional responses.

Authors:  Virgile Baudrot; Antoine Perasso; Clémentine Fritsch; Patrick Giraudoux; Francis Raoul
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Spatial arrangement of prey affects the shape of ratio-dependent functional response in strongly antagonistic predators.

Authors:  Thomas J Hossie; Dennis L Murray
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control.

Authors:  M P Hassell; G C Varley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The Adaptive Dynamics of Consumer Choice.

Authors:  Peter A Abrams
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Improving the assessment of predator functional responses by considering alternate prey and predator interactions.

Authors:  K Chan; S Boutin; T J Hossie; C J Krebs; M O'Donoghue; D L Murray
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Functional responses: a question of alternative prey and predator density.

Authors:  Britta Tschanz; Louis-Felix Bersier; Sven Bacher
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.499

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.