| Literature DB >> 33762533 |
Salma Abushouk1, Fionnuala Lundy2, Gerry Linden2, Muzamil Mahdi Abdel Hamid3, Yahia Ibrahim1, Ikhlas El Karim2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of key endodontic pathogens and their association with the clinical features and the cause of apical periodontitis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33762533 PMCID: PMC8056810 DOI: 10.14744/eej.2020.52297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Endod J ISSN: 2548-0839
Sequences of primers used in this study. All primers have previously been validated (20, 21)
| Bacteria | Forward primers | Reverse primers |
|---|---|---|
| 5’CTTCCGCAATGGACGAAAGT3’ | 5’CAACCTTTCGGCCTTCTTCA3’ | |
| 5’GCTGCAGCTCAACTGTAGTCTTG3’ | 5’TCAGTGTCAGACGGAGCCTAGTAC3’ | |
| 5’ACCAGCGTTTGACATCTTAGGAATG3’ | 5’AGCCATGCACCACCTGTCTTTAG3’ |
Prevalence, mean (±SD) and range of the bacterial species investigated
| Bacteria | Prevalence n (%) | Mean (±SD) | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 (29.3) | 1.107x103 | 0-3.02x104 | |
| (3.020x104) | |||
| 43 (57.3) | 1.2667x104 | 0-3.72x105 | |
| (4.8548x104) | |||
| 32 (42.7) | 7.12x102 | 0-1.58x104 | |
| (2.580x103) |
Prevalence of bacterial species by symptoms of apical periodontitis. Low detection threshold >50 bacteria. High detection threshold >1000 bacteria. Comparisons made using Chi-square test. Odds ratios corrected for age and gender *P<0.05
| All (n=75) n (%) | Swelling (n=41) n (%) | P-value | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value | Pain (n=34) n (%) | P-value | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low threshold | 22 | 14 | 0.31 | 1.65 | 0.35 | 9 (26.5%) | 0.62 | 0.88 | 0.80 |
| (29.3%) | (34.1%) | (0.58-4.71) | (0.30-2.52) | ||||||
| High threshold | 10 | 9 | 0.016* | 9.32 | 0.04* | 5 (14.7%) | 0.75 | 1.14 | 0.85 |
| (13.3%) | (22.0%) | (1.11-78.66) | (0.29-4.52) | ||||||
| Low threshold | 43 | 21 | 0.24 | 0.58 | 0.26 | 23 (67.6%) | 0.10 | 2.41 | 0.08 |
| (57.3%) | (51.2%) | (0.23-1.49) | (0.90-6.40) | ||||||
| High threshold | 24 | 11 | 0.29 | 0.57 | 0.26 | 14 (41.2%) | 0.12 | 2.27 | 0.12 |
| (32.0%) | (26.8%) | (0.21-1.53) | (0.82-6.30) | ||||||
| Low threshold | 32 | 20 | 0.24 | 1.74 | 0.27 | 16 (47.1%) | 0.48 | 1.80 | 0.25 |
| (42.7%) | (48.8%) | (0.65-4.60) | (0.66-4.95) | ||||||
| High threshold | 8 | 5 | 0.64 | 1.59 | 0.55 | 3 (8.8%) | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.67 |
| (10.7%) | (12.2%) | (0.34-7.36) | (0.15-3.36) |
PPrevalence of bacterial species by cause of apical periodontitis. Low detection threshold >50 bacteria. High detection threshold >1000 bacteria. Comparisons made using Chi-square test. Odds ratios corrected for age and gender. *P<0.05. **P<0.01
| Prevalence in caries (n=30) n (%) | Prevalence in trauma (n=45) n (%) | P-value | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low threshold | 14 (46.7%) | 8 (17.7%) | 0.007** | 3.62 (1.12-11.77) | 0.03* |
| High threshold | 6 (20.0%) | 4 (8.9 %) | 0.16 | 3.17 (0.67-15.16) | 0.15 |
| Low threshold | 22 (73.3%) | 21 (46.7%) | 0.022* | 4.84 (1.44-16.32) | 0.01* |
| High threshold | 13 (43.3%) | 11 (24.4%) | 0.09 | 2.46 (0.80-7.54) | 0.12 |
| Low threshold | 20 (66.7%) | 12 (26.7%) | 0.0006** | 5.01 (1.60-15.70) | 0.006** |
| High threshold | 4 (13.3%) | 4 (8.9%) | 0.54 | 2.78 (0.50-15.38) | 0.24 |