Literature DB >> 33762363

Comparative Performance of Latest-Generation and FDA-Cleared Serology Tests for the Diagnosis of Chagas Disease.

Emily A Kelly1, Christina A Bulman2, Emma L Gunderson2, Amanda M Irish3, Rebecca L Townsend4, Judy A Sakanari2, Susan L Stramer4, Caryn Bern5, Jeffrey D Whitman6.   

Abstract

Confirmed diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease (CD) requires positive results by two different IgG serology tests. Variable sensitivity has been reported among tests and in different geographic regions. Inadequate specificity presents a particular challenge in low-prevalence settings such as the United States. This study provides a direct comparison of the latest-generation IgG serology assays with four previously assessed FDA-cleared tests. Seven hundred ten blood donor plasma specimens were evaluated by Wiener Lisado and Wiener v.4.0 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and Abbott PRISM Chagas chemiluminescent assay (ChLIA). Sensitivity and specificity were assessed relative to infection status as determined by the original blood donation testing algorithm. All three latest-generation assays demonstrated 100% specificity (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.6 to 100.0). Wiener Lisado, Wiener v.4.0, and Abbott PRISM had sensitivities of 97.1% (95% CI, 95.1 to 98.4), 98.9% (95% CI, 97.4 to 99.6), and 95.5% (95% CI, 93.2 to 97.3), respectively. As with previously evaluated FDA-cleared tests, all three assays had the highest reactivity and sensitivity in samples from donors born in South America and lowest reactivity and sensitivity in specimens from those born in Mexico, with intermediate results in specimens from Central American donors. Wiener v.4.0 had the highest diagnostic sensitivity in all comparisons. Our findings suggest that the latest-generation CD serology tests could improve diagnostic sensitivity without affecting specificity.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chagas disease; Trypanosoma cruzi; clinical diagnostics; diagnostics; serology

Year:  2021        PMID: 33762363     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00158-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Performance of Ortho T. cruzi ELISA Test System for the Detection of Antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi.

Authors:  Hilda N Rivera; Isabel McAuliffe; TaLesa Aderohunmu; Ryan E Wiegand; Susan P Montgomery; Richard S Bradbury; Sukwan Handali
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 11.677

2.  Gold Nanoshells-Based Lateral Flow Assay for the Detection of Chagas Disease at the Point-of-Care.

Authors:  Melisa Medina-Rivera; Washington B Cárdenas; David Erickson; Saurabh Mehta
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.707

3.  Geographic Variations in Test Reactivity for the Serological Diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi Infection.

Authors:  Carine Truyens; Eric Dumonteil; Jackeline Alger; Maria Luisa Cafferata; Alvaro Ciganda; Luz Gibbons; Claudia Herrera; Sergio Sosa-Estani; Pierre Buekens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Anaphylactic Reactions Due to Triatoma protracta (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) and Invasion into a Home in Northern California, USA.

Authors:  Norman L Beatty; Zoe S White; Chanakya R Bhosale; Kristen Wilson; Anthony P Cannella; Tanise Stenn; Nathan Burkett-Cadena; Samantha M Wisely
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  The Importance of Screening for Chagas Disease Against the Backdrop of Changing Epidemiology in the USA.

Authors:  Jennifer Ayres; Rachel Marcus; Claire J Standley
Journal:  Curr Trop Med Rep       Date:  2022-09-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.