| Literature DB >> 33762196 |
Süheyla Abitağaoğlu1, Ceren Köksal2, Sevgi Alagöz2, Ceren Şanlı Karip2, Dilek Erdoğan Arı2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The risk of emergence agitation (EA) is high in patients undergoing nasal surgery. The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of EA in adults undergoing septoplasty and the effect of ketamine on EA.Entities:
Keywords: Emergence agitation; General anesthesia; Ketamine; Septoplasty
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33762196 PMCID: PMC9373669 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2020.12.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Anesthesiol ISSN: 0104-0014
Figure 1CONSORT flow diagram.
Riker Sedation/Agitation Scale (SAS).
| 7 | Severely agitated | Remove endotracheal tubes, attempt to remove catheters, climb over bedrail, attack staff, thrash sideways |
| 6 | Very agitated | Do not calm down despite frequent verbal reminders of limits, require physical restraints, bite endotracheal tubes |
| 5 | Agitated | Display anxiety or mild agitated, attempt to sit up, calm down on verbal instructions |
| 4 | Calm, cooperative | Calm, easily arousable, follow verbal instructions |
| 3 | Sedated | Difficult to arouse, awaken to verbal stimuli or gentle shaking but drifts off again, follow simple verbal instructions |
| 2 | Highly sedated | Arouse to physical stimuli but do not communicate or follow verbal instructions, may move spontaneously |
| 1 | Unarousable | Minimal or no response to noxious stimuli, do not communicate or follow verbal instructions |
Comparison of patient demographics and surgical duration.
| 33.54 ± 10.71 | 32.80 ± 10.35 | 0.724 | |
| 15 (28.8%) | 18 (36.0%) | 0.440 | |
| 24.33 ± 3.30 | 24.08 ± 3.58 | 0.717 | |
| 0.422 | |||
| I | 41 (78.8%) | 36 (72.0%) | |
| II | 11 (21.2%) | 14 (28.0%) | |
| 64.00 (27–210) | 55.00 (20–121) | 0.136 |
t-test.
Pearson's Chi-Squared test.
Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Riker Sedation/Agitation Scale (SAS) scores at emergence from anesthesia, incidence of cough and response time to verbal stimuli.
| Agitated | 8 (15.4%) | 12 (24.0%) | 0.273 | |
| Calm/Sedated | 44 (84.6%) | 38 (76.0%) | ||
| None | 41 (78.8%) | 26 (52.0%) | 0.036 | |
| Present | 11 (21.2%) | 24 (48.0%) | ||
| Mean (SD) | 11.79 (4.65) | 7.54 (3.21) | <0.001 | |
| Mean (SD) | 13.48 (4.90) | 9.22(3.45) | <0.001 |
Agitated, SAS score of 5/6/7; Calm/Sedated, SAS score of 1/2/3/4; Cough classification, (0) – none; (1 to 3) – present.
Pearson Chi-Square test.
t-test, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Riker Sedation/Agitation Scale (SAS) and Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) scores after surgery.
| SAS | 0 | Agitated | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (2.0%) | 0.490 |
| Calm/Sedated | 52 (100%) | 49 (98%) | |||
| 10 | Agitated | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | – | |
| Calm/Sedated | 52 (100%) | 50 (100%) | |||
| 20 | Agitated | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1.000 | |
| Calm/Sedated | 51 (98.1%) | 50 (100%) | |||
| 30 | Agitated | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1.000 | |
| Calm | 51 (98.1%) | 50 (100%) | |||
| VAS | 0 | Median (min–max) | 0 (0–5) | 1 (0–8) | 0.001 |
| 10 | Median (min–max) | 0 (-1–5) | 0 (-2–3) | 0.108 | |
| 20 | Median (min–max) | 0 (-2–6) | 0 (-2–5) | 0.213 | |
| 30 | Median (min–max) | 0 (-2–6) | 0 (-5–5) | 0.181 |
Agitated, SAS score of 5/6/7; Calm/Sedated, SAS score of 1/2/3/4.
Fisher's exact test.
Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.