Efrat Neter1, Lea Glass-Marmor2, Anat Wolkowitz2, Idit Lavi3, Ariel Miller2,4. 1. Ruppin Academic Center, 3 Bait, Ruppin Academic Center, 4025000, Emeq Hefer, Israel. neter@ruppin.ac.il. 2. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. 3. Department of Community Medicine & Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel. 4. Multiple Sclerosis Center & Department of Neurology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Though adherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) among persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) varies and is often below 80%, only few prospective studies on adherence examined predictors beyond demographic and clinical characteristics. OBJECTIVES: Identify antecedents to adherence and persistence to DMT in a prospective design among PwMS. METHODS: PwMS (n = 186) were prospectively assessed at three time points: baseline, 6 (Time 1) and 12 months later (Time 2). Clinical, demographic information and patient-reported medication beliefs, illness perceptions, medication habits, perceived health and affect were surveyed in-person. Adherence and persistence were assessed by a combination of self-reports and retrospective review of medication claims. FINDINGS: PwMS were 69.9% (Time 1) and 71% (Time 2) adherent to their DMTs and 64.5.9% were persistent. Beliefs about Medications were consistently predictive at both time points (baseline to Time 1 and Time 1 to Time 2) of medication adherence and persistence whereas other perceptions were predictive in some analyses; clinical and demographic characteristics were mostly not predictive of adherence nor persistence. The prospective association of beliefs about medication with adherence held also in multivariate analyses (OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence and persistence are predicted by medication beliefs of PwMS. As medication beliefs are modifiable, they should be assessed periodically and targeted as a focus of tailored interventions aimed to improve adherence and consequently health outcomes in PwMS. REGISTRATION: Clinical trials registry # NCT02488343 , date: 06/08/2015.
BACKGROUND: Though adherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) among persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) varies and is often below 80%, only few prospective studies on adherence examined predictors beyond demographic and clinical characteristics. OBJECTIVES: Identify antecedents to adherence and persistence to DMT in a prospective design among PwMS. METHODS: PwMS (n = 186) were prospectively assessed at three time points: baseline, 6 (Time 1) and 12 months later (Time 2). Clinical, demographic information and patient-reported medication beliefs, illness perceptions, medication habits, perceived health and affect were surveyed in-person. Adherence and persistence were assessed by a combination of self-reports and retrospective review of medication claims. FINDINGS: PwMS were 69.9% (Time 1) and 71% (Time 2) adherent to their DMTs and 64.5.9% were persistent. Beliefs about Medications were consistently predictive at both time points (baseline to Time 1 and Time 1 to Time 2) of medication adherence and persistence whereas other perceptions were predictive in some analyses; clinical and demographic characteristics were mostly not predictive of adherence nor persistence. The prospective association of beliefs about medication with adherence held also in multivariate analyses (OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence and persistence are predicted by medication beliefs of PwMS. As medication beliefs are modifiable, they should be assessed periodically and targeted as a focus of tailored interventions aimed to improve adherence and consequently health outcomes in PwMS. REGISTRATION: Clinical trials registry # NCT02488343 , date: 06/08/2015.
Authors: G Chehab; G M Sauer; J G Richter; R Brinks; R Willers; R Fischer-Betz; B Winkler-Rohlfing; M Schneider Journal: Lupus Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: V Devonshire; Y Lapierre; R Macdonell; C Ramo-Tello; F Patti; P Fontoura; L Suchet; R Hyde; I Balla; E M Frohman; B C Kieseier Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Joyce A Cramer; Anuja Roy; Anita Burrell; Carol J Fairchild; Mahesh J Fuldeore; Daniel A Ollendorf; Peter K Wong Journal: Value Health Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: S J Camp; V L Stevenson; A J Thompson; G T Ingle; D H Miller; C Borras; B Brochet; V Dousset; M Falautano; M Filippi; N F Kalkers; X Montalban; C H Polman; D W Langdon Journal: Brain Date: 2005-07-27 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: O Fernández; R Arroyo; S Martínez-Yélamos; M Marco; J A García Merino; D Muñoz; E Merino; A Roque Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 3.240